★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<hi rend="underline">Belgrave<add><del>Mr</del></add></hi> Opposition - <unclear> <hi rend="underline"> Caprice</unclear> against <gap/> - Letter asked, to quell it.</hi><del><gap/> Mar. 1 1800</del></p> | <hi rend="underline">Belgrave<add><del>Mr</del></add></hi> Opposition - <unclear> <hi rend="underline"> Caprice</unclear> against <gap/> - Letter asked, to quell it.</hi><del><gap/> Mar. 1 1800</del></p> | ||
<p>In answer to a Letter of mine to <unclear>L<hi rend="superscript">a</hi></unclear> Belgrave, of the 17<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of December last, requesting his assistance in the proposed <unclear> | <p>In answer to a Letter of mine to <unclear>L<hi rend="superscript">a</hi></unclear> Belgrave, of the 17<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of December last, requesting his assistance in the proposed <unclear>Fothill</unclear> Fields Appropriation Bill, I received from his Agent, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><unclear>Boodle</unclear>, on the 19th of the last month, a refusal, which I took for a <hi rend="underline">dilatory</hi> one, but which, on a verbal explanation with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <unclear>Boodle</unclear> this day, turned out to be intended as a <hi rend="underline">peremptory</hi> one. - </p> | ||
<p>To my enquiries on what points the refusal turned, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. Boodle answered with great candour, that Lord Grosvenor and Lord Belgrave were both fully sensible, that if the Penitentiary Establishment were indeed to be set down, any where in the Neighbourhood, the damage to the Grosvenor Estate would be considerably less, were the Building to be on the proposed spot on <unclear>Fothill</unclear> Fields, than if it were on any part of Salisbury Estate: but that, in the latter went, the damage to their Estate would be so immense, and o much beyond the reach of calculation, that they could not persuade themselves that their remonstrances against it should be otherwise than successful. - </p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
Clandestine engagement with Lord Belgrave|Mar 1 1800 Mar 15 1800
A3 [] Mr Bentham to Mr Long. - 1 March 1800, BelgraveMr Opposition - <hi rend="underline"> Caprice against - Letter asked, to quell it.</hi> Mar. 1 1800
In answer to a Letter of mine to La Belgrave, of the 17th of December last, requesting his assistance in the proposed Fothill Fields Appropriation Bill, I received from his Agent, MrBoodle, on the 19th of the last month, a refusal, which I took for a dilatory one, but which, on a verbal explanation with Mr Boodle this day, turned out to be intended as a peremptory one. -
To my enquiries on what points the refusal turned, Mr. Boodle answered with great candour, that Lord Grosvenor and Lord Belgrave were both fully sensible, that if the Penitentiary Establishment were indeed to be set down, any where in the Neighbourhood, the damage to the Grosvenor Estate would be considerably less, were the Building to be on the proposed spot on Fothill Fields, than if it were on any part of Salisbury Estate: but that, in the latter went, the damage to their Estate would be so immense, and o much beyond the reach of calculation, that they could not persuade themselves that their remonstrances against it should be otherwise than successful. -
Identifier: | JB/121/026/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1800-03-01 |
|||
121 |
Panopticon |
||
026 |
Clandestine engagement with Lord Belgrave |
||
001 |
Mr Bentham to Mr Long |
||
Correspondence |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D3 / E10 / F3 |
||
1800 |
|||
1800 |
|||
Not sent; see note 5 to letter 1515, vol. 6 |
001 |
||