JB/122/484/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/484/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<!-- whole page crossed through in pencil -->
<!-- whole page crossed through in pencil -->


<head>&sect;.9. Services by <add>the</add> Contractor <del>and his Co-Claimant</del></head> <p><add>1 <gap/> of the Hulk price.  so long ago as the 10<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1792</add>[+] <!-- continues in margin --><lb/><note>in the Second<lb/>of my addresses<lb/>on the subject to<lb/><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Pitt, I expressed<lb/>my hope<lb/>that supposing<lb/>the offer in<lb/>question not to<lb/>obtain acceptance, it</note><lb/>it might still, with relation to the public Service be not<lb/>altogether without its use; viz by enabling him to reduce the<lb/>price, at that time paid, for the maintenance of Convicts on<lb/>board the Hulks.  If my memory does not deceive me, a Service to<lb/>the amount of some thousands of pounds a Year was thereupon<lb/>actually rendered to the public by this means.  At the time of my<lb/>giving in the above proposal, according to two contracts of which I<lb/>have copies. <hi rend="superscript">x</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">x</hi> Campbel with<lb/>Treasury 10 <sic>Mar</sic><lb/>1786.<lb/>Bradley with<lb/>Treasury 10 <sic>Mar</sic><lb/>1786.<lb/>See On this head<lb/><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham to<lb/><sic>R. Hon</sic> W Pitt<lb/>23<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1791 or<lb/>to <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 10<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1792</note>
<head>&sect;.9. Services by <add>the</add> Contractor <del>and his Co-Claimant</del></head> <p><add>1 <gap/> of the Hulk price.  so long ago as the 10<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1792</add>[+] <!-- continues in margin --><lb/><note>in the Second<lb/>of my addresses<lb/>on the subject to<lb/><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Pitt, I expressed<lb/>my hope<lb/>that supposing<lb/>the offer in<lb/>question not to<lb/>obtain acceptance, it</note><lb/>it might still, with relation to the public Service be not<lb/>altogether without its use; viz by enabling him to reduce the<lb/>price, at that time paid, for the maintenance of Convicts on<lb/>board the Hulks.  If my memory does not deceive me, a Service to<lb/>the amount of some thousands of pounds a Year was thereupon<lb/>actually rendered to the public by this means.  At the time of my<lb/>giving in the above proposal, according to two contracts of which I<lb/>have copies. <hi rend="superscript">x</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">x</hi> Campbel with<lb/>Treasury 10 <sic>Mar</sic><lb/>1786.<lb/>Bradley with<lb/>Treasury 10 <sic>Mar</sic><lb/>1786.<lb/>See On this head<lb/><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham to<lb/><sic>R. Hon</sic> W Pitt<lb/>23<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1791 or<lb/>to <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 10<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1792</note> the price paid to the Contractor was 1<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> per day per head &#x2014;<lb/>£18..5 a year, besides £1625 a year for the pay of <Add>the</add> Masters and<>lb/>Crew of each of the Vessels by the Master and Crews of which<lb/.the function of Jailor was performed; to which was likewise added<lb/>the unliquidated <sic>expence</sic> of fitting the Vessels for that purpose.<lb/>if my Information on this head did not deceive me, sometime<lb/>after the presentation of that proposal, upon the <hi rend="underline">renewal</hi> of the<lb/><hi rend="underline">Contracts</hi> relative to the Hulks, a considerable abatement was made<lb/>in the price.  whether I myself saw the Contract, containing such<lb/>reduced terms, or was only informed of it in substance, I do not<lb/>recollect, at any rate, for the effect in question, if any such was produced,<lb/>I never heard of any other cause.  How the matter stands, might<lb/>easily, I should suppose, be learned at the Treasury, if to any purpose it<lb/>were at any time though worth while.  If, at any time, any such<lb/>reduction was made, in that case by the subsequent depreciation of<lb/>money, the difference can scarcely by this time have failed to be much more<lb/>than replaced.</p> <p>II  Pecuniary Service tendered by <hi rend="underline">the Claimant's brother</hi>, in<lb/>consequence of the business in question.</p> <p>It was by the ingenuity displayed by my brother, in the<lb/>invention of the Panopticon principle of Architecture, and in<lb/>the invention of that system of Mechanism which there<lb/>has been such frequent occasion to speak of, that <hi rend="underline">Earl<lb/>Spencer</hi>, at that time first Lord of the Admiralty, was<lb/>drawn to the spot (I mean my present residence) where<lb/>those objects were exhibited.  It was by the scientific<lb/>information, displayed in the course of the conversation<lb/>and correspondence that ensued, that the Admiralty Board</p> 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 07:50, 1 April 2021

'Click Here To Edit


§.9. Services by the Contractor and his Co-Claimant

1 of the Hulk price. so long ago as the 10th of Feby 1792[+]
in the Second
of my addresses
on the subject to
Mr Pitt, I expressed
my hope
that supposing
the offer in
question not to
obtain acceptance, it

it might still, with relation to the public Service be not
altogether without its use; viz by enabling him to reduce the
price, at that time paid, for the maintenance of Convicts on
board the Hulks. If my memory does not deceive me, a Service to
the amount of some thousands of pounds a Year was thereupon
actually rendered to the public by this means. At the time of my
giving in the above proposal, according to two contracts of which I
have copies. x x Campbel with
Treasury 10 Mar
1786.
Bradley with
Treasury 10 Mar
1786.
See On this head
Mr Bentham to
R. Hon W Pitt
23d Jany 1791 or
to do 10th Feby 1792
the price paid to the Contractor was 1s per day per head —
£18..5 a year, besides £1625 a year for the pay of the Masters and<>lb/>Crew of each of the Vessels by the Master and Crews of which<lb/.the function of Jailor was performed; to which was likewise added
the unliquidated expence of fitting the Vessels for that purpose.
if my Information on this head did not deceive me, sometime
after the presentation of that proposal, upon the renewal of the
Contracts relative to the Hulks, a considerable abatement was made
in the price. whether I myself saw the Contract, containing such
reduced terms, or was only informed of it in substance, I do not
recollect, at any rate, for the effect in question, if any such was produced,
I never heard of any other cause. How the matter stands, might
easily, I should suppose, be learned at the Treasury, if to any purpose it
were at any time though worth while. If, at any time, any such
reduction was made, in that case by the subsequent depreciation of
money, the difference can scarcely by this time have failed to be much more
than replaced.

II Pecuniary Service tendered by the Claimant's brother, in
consequence of the business in question.

It was by the ingenuity displayed by my brother, in the
invention of the Panopticon principle of Architecture, and in
the invention of that system of Mechanism which there
has been such frequent occasion to speak of, that Earl
Spencer
, at that time first Lord of the Admiralty, was
drawn to the spot (I mean my present residence) where
those objects were exhibited. It was by the scientific
information, displayed in the course of the conversation
and correspondence that ensued, that the Admiralty Board



Identifier: | JB/122/484/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

484

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Note (a)

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F69 / F70

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in