JB/042/579/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/579/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1823 May 22
1823 May 22 + L<gap/> G 2
1827 Feb. 23 sum
Constitutional Code


III R<gap/>
Ch. XII Judiciary Collectively
&sect;.29. Located here
29. Not by Executive Chief
Not by Prime Minister
Not by Constitution
2
1
<gap/> Location
of <gap/> why not in
Constitution, nor Legislative,
nor Executive,
but in Justice Ministry?
Ratiocination
Art. 5. Question. Why locate as to the function of locating all the several
Judges in their respective Offices official situations locate it not in the hands of
a single funct the members of the supreme Constitution of the those people in whose hands the function of
locating the possessors of the supreme legislative authority is located
but and why then of a single functionary himself one and the same functions for all located by the
Executive Chief Supreme in the Executive Department?
2
Answer. Reasons
1. <gap/> in Constitution
1. Want of time: as is
case of Executive Chief.
Answer. Reasons. 1. First as to the not locating it in the <gap/>
hands of the supreme Constitution.
1 Want of time: namely for receiving adequate information: as in the case of the function of
Executive Chief.
1. Consider the member for in the first place as the gr<gap/> As to appropriate moral aptitude
That with relation to the choice location of the members of the supreme
legislature the here proposed members of the supreme Constitution
are not unapt but on the other hand contrary in an exclusive degree
apt, has been already <gap/>. But to the case of the class of functionaries
here in question namely the Judges of the several Judicatories
this same appropriate moral aptitude does not
extend. To the Of locating seating in the supreme Legislature a majority
in the breasts of whom in addition to the <gap/> the disposition
to make to his <gap/> <gap/> happiness sacrifice of the happiness of the
greatest number <gap/> in <gap/> the breast of his own member of the supreme
Constitutive can the hope of have place. But of locating
in the situation of Judge a single individual in whose breast
in addition to the power the disposition to make <gap/><gap/><gap/>
to a consider degree more or less considerable this <gap/> sacrifice
may without much difficulty have place. By the This is that inducement
points of appropriate aptitude of which he has succeeded in putting
himself in possession and of which he has had the opportunity of
making adequate display this is that individual has obtained
at the hands of the majority of the Electors that degree of confidence
by which that for the in regard to the location of an individual in the
office in question they would the majority of them be guided in their
votes by this office his declared opinion. They would regard as being <gap/> the relation to the situation
<gap/> the individual possessed of the maximum of appropriate aptitude taken in the aggregate, the individual, whatever <gap/> <gap/> he were, who by this their chosen shall have been pointed to us
being the very individual so universally desired:
<!-- Side notes to be included -->




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:37, 4 April 2021

Click Here To Edit

1823 May 22 + L G 2 1827 Feb. 23 sum Constitutional Code

III R Ch. XII Judiciary Collectively §.29. Located here 29. Not by Executive Chief Not by Prime Minister Not by Constitution

2

1 Location of why not in Constitution, nor Legislative, nor Executive, but in Justice Ministry?

Ratiocination

Art. 5. Question. Why locate as to the function of locating all the several Judges in their respective Offices official situations locate it not in the hands of a single funct the members of the supreme Constitution of the those people in whose hands the function of locating the possessors of the supreme legislative authority is located but and why then of a single functionary himself one and the same functions for all located by the Executive Chief Supreme in the Executive Department?

2 Answer. Reasons 1. in Constitution 1. Want of time: as is case of Executive Chief.

Answer. Reasons. 1. First as to the not locating it in the hands of the supreme Constitution.

1 Want of time: namely for receiving adequate information: as in the case of the function of Executive Chief.

1. Consider the member for in the first place as the gr As to appropriate moral aptitude

That with relation to the choice location of the members of the supreme legislature the here proposed members of the supreme Constitution are not unapt but on the other hand contrary in an exclusive degree apt, has been already . But to the case of the class of functionaries here in question namely the Judges of the several Judicatories this same appropriate moral aptitude does not extend. To the Of locating seating in the supreme Legislature a majority in the breasts of whom in addition to the the disposition to make to his happiness sacrifice of the happiness of the greatest number in the breast of his own member of the supreme Constitutive can the hope of have place. But of locating in the situation of Judge a single individual in whose breast in addition to the power the disposition to make to a consider degree more or less considerable this sacrifice may without much difficulty have place. By the This is that inducement points of appropriate aptitude of which he has succeeded in putting himself in possession and of which he has had the opportunity of making adequate display this is that individual has obtained at the hands of the majority of the Electors that degree of confidence by which that for the in regard to the location of an individual in the office in question they would the majority of them be guided in their votes by this office his declared opinion. They would regard as being the relation to the situation the individual possessed of the maximum of appropriate aptitude taken in the aggregate, the individual, whatever he were, who by this their chosen shall have been pointed to us being the very individual so universally desired:




Identifier: | JB/042/579/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1823-05-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

579

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

ratiocinative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13502

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in