JB/078/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/078/021/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/078/021/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1826. Nov.r 22d.
<p>1826. Nov.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 22<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.</p>
Review of Humphreys
<p>Review of Humphreys</p>
Notaries
<p>Notaries.</p>
&#x2014;
&#x2014;<lb/>
26.
<p>26.</p>
For appropriate aptitude
<p>For appropriate aptitude<lb/>
in all branches in
in all branches in<lb/>
all Judges, my Constitutional
all Judges, my Constitutional<lb/>
Code provides
Code provides<lb/>
<del>a<gap/></del> 40 distinguishable
<del>a<gap/></del> 40 distinguishable<lb/>
securities, and mercy scarce
securities, <add>and mercy</add> scarce<lb/>
one of which, in any
one of which, in any<lb/>
tolerably efficient degree,
tolerably efficient degree,<lb/>
if at all, has
if at all, has<lb/>
place in the case of
place in the case of<lb/>
English Judges.
English Judges.</p>


Even without this
<p>Even without this<lb/>
new proposed security applying
<add>new</add> proposed security applying<lb/>
to a subordinate
to a subordinate<lb/>
class of lawyers,
class of lawyers,<lb/>
these applying
these applying<lb/>
to the superordinate,
to the superordinate,<lb/>
would go near
would go near<lb/>
to suffice
to suffice.</p>
27.
Mathematically
speaking, given the
nominees and superordinates,
given are
the Subordinates
Are they no Mr. Canning?
Are they not, Bathhurst?
Are they not Lord Melville?
Are they not Lord Liverpool?
Are they not Ld. Eldom?
GIven the L.d Liverpool's,
given the Lord Melville's,
given are not
the Wallace's.
Given the Wallace's, are they not given
the Jeffreys<add>Sy<gap/></add> and the
Bremmers?


Notaries.
<p>27.</p>
28.
<p>Mathematically<lb/>
Capable of being filled
speaking, <hi rend="underline">given</hi> the<lb/>
with virtue are Judge
nominees and superordinates,<lb/>
and Notary classes:
<hi rend="underline">given</hi> are<lb/>
In France, in consideration
the Subordinates<lb/>
proportion is
Are they no Mr. Canning?</p>
so the Judge, in lawyers
<p>Are they not, Bathurst?</p>
the Notary Class.
<p>Are they not Lord Melville?</p>
Incapable every where
<p>Are they not Lord Liverpool?</p>
are in all but a consummate
<p>Are they not L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>. Eldon?</p>
degree the advocate
<p>Given the L.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Liverpool's,</p>
class.  To sincerity necessity
<p>Given are not the <lb/>
opposes her inexorable
Lord Melville's?</p>
voice.
<p>Given the Lord Melville's,<lb/>
given are not<lb/>
the Wallace's.</p>
<p>Given the Wallace's, <lb/>
are they not given<lb/>
the <del>Jeffreys</del><add>Sy<gap/></add> and the<lb/>
Bremners?</p><pb/>


29.
<p>Notaries.</p>
Advocates and Mr B's
&#x2014;<lb/>
profession of sincerity:
<p>28.</p>
admissions by those whose
<p>Capable of being filled<lb/>
interests are served by
with virtue are Judge<lb/>
their insincerity.
and Notary classes:<lb/>
Custom gives acceptance,
In France, in consideration<lb/>
nothing, truth.
proportion is<lb/>
30.
so the Judge, in lawyers<lb/>
Circumstances make
the Notary Class.</p>
men: law, circumstances.
<p>Incapable every where<lb/>
See whether my Judges
are in all but a consummate<lb/>
and notaries are not
degree the advocate<lb/>
still better than the
class.  To sincerity necessity<lb/>
French.
opposes her inexorable<lb/>
voice.</p>
 
<p>29.</p>
<p>Advocates and Mr B's<lb/>
profession of sincerity:<lb/>
<del><!-- Struck through in pencil -->admissions</del> by those whose<lb/>
interests are served by<lb/>
their insincerity.</p>
<p>Custom gives acceptance,<lb/>
nothing, truth.</p>
 
<p>30.</p>
<p>Circumstances make<lb/>
men: law, circumstances.</p>
<p>See whether my Judges<lb/>
and notaries are not<lb/>
still better than the<lb/>
French.</p><pb/>




Line 84: Line 90:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 14:38, 16 April 2021

Click Here To Edit

1826. Nov.r 22d.

Review of Humphreys

Notaries.


26.

For appropriate aptitude
in all branches in
all Judges, my Constitutional
Code provides
a 40 distinguishable
securities, and mercy scarce
one of which, in any
tolerably efficient degree,
if at all, has
place in the case of
English Judges.

Even without this
new proposed security applying
to a subordinate
class of lawyers,
these applying
to the superordinate,
would go near
to suffice.

27.

Mathematically
speaking, given the
nominees and superordinates,
given are
the Subordinates
Are they no Mr. Canning?

Are they not, Bathurst?

Are they not Lord Melville?

Are they not Lord Liverpool?

Are they not Ld. Eldon?

Given the L.d Liverpool's,

Given are not the
Lord Melville's?

Given the Lord Melville's,
given are not
the Wallace's.

Given the Wallace's,
are they not given
the JeffreysSy and the
Bremners?


---page break---

Notaries.


28.

Capable of being filled
with virtue are Judge
and Notary classes:
In France, in consideration
proportion is
so the Judge, in lawyers
the Notary Class.

Incapable every where
are in all but a consummate
degree the advocate
class. To sincerity necessity
opposes her inexorable
voice.

29.

Advocates and Mr B's
profession of sincerity:
admissions by those whose
interests are served by
their insincerity.

Custom gives acceptance,
nothing, truth.

30.

Circumstances make
men: law, circumstances.

See whether my Judges
and notaries are not
still better than the
French.


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/078/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-11-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

26-30

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

Notaries

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25112

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in