JB/041/504/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/041/504/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/041/504/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/504/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/504/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>UNIV. COLL. LOND. BENTHAM MSS. 41 504</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Ch. XXV [...] Minelles<lb/>
 
[...].6. Jurisdiction adjustive function<lb/></p>
 
<p>Art. 11.  As between two such conflicting mandates, the privilege<lb/>
belongs to that one to which execution has fast begun to<lb/>
be given.</p>
<p>Art. <del>12</del>6.  <del>To the</del> In case of disagreement as to the priority in point<lb/>
of time, the prevalence belongs provisionally to the orders of<lb/>
the invalid Judge.</p>
<p>Art. 13.  Jurisdictive-adjustive function.  To this function<lb/>
exercise is given by an imperative mandate, declaring an Appeal<lb/>
from either of the <unclear>thus</unclear> conflicting mandates, to which<lb/>
of them execution shall definitively given.  This function, of<lb/>
the territories are situated both within the same District<lb/>
belongs to the Judge Appellate, if in different districts to the<lb/>
Justice Minister.</p>
<p>Art. 14.  In the exercise of this same Jurisdictive adjustive<lb/>
function, it will be the case of the superordinate functionary<lb/>
lest by the one subordinate the invasion be unduly declined<lb/>
or unduly performed, or by the other unduly acquiesced in<lb/>
or opposed:  as also lest by collusion on the part of one or<lb/>
both, priority of execution in favor of a party on either side<lb/>
be unduly obtained.</p>
<p>Art. 15.  Provisional only is the prevalence in the above <lb/>
examples spoken of.  Between counterdemandants, whether <lb/>
in the same or different judicial territories for the arrangements<lb/>
made for ultimate equality or proportionality<lb/>
of distribution, as of <unclear>heathens</unclear>, &amp;&c of benefits, see<lb/>
the Penal by the Non Penal, more especially the non penal<lb/>
Code.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:51, 25 April 2021

'Click Here To Edit

UNIV. COLL. LOND. BENTHAM MSS. 41 504

Ch. XXV [...] Minelles
[...].6. Jurisdiction adjustive function

Art. 11. As between two such conflicting mandates, the privilege
belongs to that one to which execution has fast begun to
be given.

Art. 126. To the In case of disagreement as to the priority in point
of time, the prevalence belongs provisionally to the orders of
the invalid Judge.

Art. 13. Jurisdictive-adjustive function. To this function
exercise is given by an imperative mandate, declaring an Appeal
from either of the thus conflicting mandates, to which
of them execution shall definitively given. This function, of
the territories are situated both within the same District
belongs to the Judge Appellate, if in different districts to the
Justice Minister.

Art. 14. In the exercise of this same Jurisdictive adjustive
function, it will be the case of the superordinate functionary
lest by the one subordinate the invasion be unduly declined
or unduly performed, or by the other unduly acquiesced in
or opposed: as also lest by collusion on the part of one or
both, priority of execution in favor of a party on either side
be unduly obtained.

Art. 15. Provisional only is the prevalence in the above
examples spoken of. Between counterdemandants, whether
in the same or different judicial territories for the arrangements
made for ultimate equality or proportionality
of distribution, as of heathens, &&c of benefits, see
the Penal by the Non Penal, more especially the non penal
Code.



Identifier: | JB/041/504/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

504

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in