JB/068/335/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/068/335/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/068/335/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/335/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/335/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>UNIV. COLL. LOND. BENTHAM MSS 68 335</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1826, APRIL 13<lb/>
 
Penal Code<lb/>
∬. Satisfaction</head>
<note>B.1. General Titles<lb/>
<del>I  Means of repression </del><lb/>
I  Remedies<lb/>
Chr. 13 <del>Means of repression</del><lb/>
∬. Satisfaction</note>
<p>Art 1.  Modes of satisfaction are the following.</p>
<note>1<lb/>
Satisfaction &#x2014; modes<lb/>
1 Vindictive follows<lb/>
of course 1. from the<lb/>
punishment  2 from the<lb/>
burden <add>imposed</add> of yielding satisfaction<lb/>
in other shapes </note>
<p>1.  Vindictive.  This follows of course &amp;<lb/>
without need of any operation performed for<lb/>
the purpose &#x2014; in the first place from the punishment,<lb/>
if any;  in the next place, from the<lb/>
burden inseparably imposed by the obligation<lb/>
of yielding satisfaction in any of its<lb/>
other shapes.</p>
<note>2<lb/>
2 X Vindictive &#x2014; Attestation<lb/>
by judge that<lb/>
a <del>supposed</del>act <add>prejudicial to wrong is</add> <unclear>asserted</unclear> <del>this course by</del><add>in</add> the offence<lb/>
to have taken place, has<lb/>
not taken place.</note>
<p>2.  Attestative.  The application of this mode<lb/>
is confined to the case where, in consequence<lb/>
of the offence some fact the belief of <lb/>
which if believed would be productive of one<lb/>
in some shape to the party wronged, which<lb/>
said fact had not taken place as by something<lb/>
said or done by the wrong doer been made to appear<lb/>
where taken place.  In this <del>was</del>operation by<lb/>
which the satisfaction is afforded is an attestation<lb/>
emanating from the judge, by<lb/>
which it is declared &amp; thereby proved that<lb/>
the fact, the belief of which would, as above,<lb/>
be prejudicial to the wronged, did<lb/>
not, as supposed, take place.</p>
<note>3<lb/>
3 Vindicative &#x2014; the
attestation applied to<lb/>
the case where the<lb/>
supposed fact would<lb/>
be prejudicial by<lb/>
aspersion</note>
3.  Vindicative.  This is but a submode<lb/>
of the attestative:  its applicability is confined <add>The <del>way</del>way in which it is</add><lb/>
to the case, where the fact prejudicial<lb/>
to the wronged as above, would be prejudicial to him by aspersion cast upon his reputation,<lb/>
in some shape or other




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:54, 26 April 2021

Click Here To Edit

UNIV. COLL. LOND. BENTHAM MSS 68 335

1826, APRIL 13
Penal Code
∬. Satisfaction
B.1. General Titles
I Means of repression
I Remedies
Chr. 13 Means of repression
∬. Satisfaction

Art 1. Modes of satisfaction are the following.

1
Satisfaction — modes
1 Vindictive follows
of course 1. from the
punishment 2 from the
burden imposed of yielding satisfaction
in other shapes

1. Vindictive. This follows of course &
without need of any operation performed for
the purpose — in the first place from the punishment,
if any; in the next place, from the
burden inseparably imposed by the obligation
of yielding satisfaction in any of its
other shapes.

2
2 X Vindictive — Attestation
by judge that
a supposedact prejudicial to wrong is asserted this course byin the offence
to have taken place, has
not taken place.

2. Attestative. The application of this mode
is confined to the case where, in consequence
of the offence some fact the belief of
which if believed would be productive of one
in some shape to the party wronged, which
said fact had not taken place as by something
said or done by the wrong doer been made to appear
where taken place. In this wasoperation by
which the satisfaction is afforded is an attestation
emanating from the judge, by
which it is declared & thereby proved that
the fact, the belief of which would, as above,
be prejudicial to the wronged, did
not, as supposed, take place.

3
3 Vindicative — the attestation applied to
the case where the
supposed fact would
be prejudicial by
aspersion
3. Vindicative. This is but a submode
of the attestative: its applicability is confined The wayway in which it is
to the case, where the fact prejudicial
to the wronged as above, would be prejudicial to him by aspersion cast upon his reputation,
in some shape or other



Identifier: | JB/068/335/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68.

Date_1

1826-04-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

068

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

335

Info in main headings field

penal code

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john neal

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

22530

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in