JB/124/027/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/124/027/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header in pencil -->
 
<p>2<lb/>Note>Escape<lb/>Observations with<lb/>Answers</note></p> <p>which it is just as possible for Parliament <add>itself</add> to <del><gap/></del><lb/>make <del>laws of itself</del> <add>the law</add> as to <del>keep</del> leave <del>the business to</del> <add>it to be made by</add><lb/>the judicial Power.  what power but the judicial<lb/>has made the law in the case of libel, sedition,<lb/><del>tort</del> <add>unlawful assembly <del>in</del> &amp;c &amp;c</add> in short all offences which are such only at<lb/>Common Law? &#x2014; to say nothing of larceny, arson &amp;c<lb/>where if the <del>punishment is</del> Statute law has <add>interfered</add> more<lb/>or less <del>made</del> in the appointment of the punishment<lb/>the definition of the offence has been made out purely<lb/>by Common Law?  In short, what is the whole system<lb/>of the Common Law, <del>but a s</del> especially in the penal<lb/>branch of it, but a system of <foreign><hi rend="underline">ex post-facto</hi></foreign> legislation?<lb/>Driven by necessity, I enable the judicial power to do<lb/><del>do a</del> <add><del>in a case no ways open to abuse</del></add> by <add>express</add> commission from the legislative, in a case no<lb/>ways open to abuse, what without any such commission<lb/>it has been in use to do time out of mind in<lb/>a thousand instances, in cases open to abuse in the<lb/>highest degree that can be conceived.</p> <p>As to the <sic>controul</sic> of a Jury, <del>it exists in one case</del> <add><del>there is as much of it</del>/it is the same</add><lb/><del>as much</del> <add>in one case</add> as in the other.  My object is to enable <del>them</del> <Add>the</add><lb/><add>Jury</add> to exercise it, with as little difficulty <del>as possible</del> and<lb/>danger of mistake, as possible.  Where a sufficient<lb/>ground for a verdict can be made by the <del>attestation</del> <add>representation</add><lb/>of <del>place</del> <add>a</add> matter of fact cognizable by the senses, I<lb/>choose rather to give them the <del>question of</del> <add>plain</add> fact to<lb/>judge of than to send them a hunting after <hi rend="underline">intentions</hi>,<lb/>a chase in which they are but too apt to be<lb/>bewildered by false lights.</p> 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:54, 29 April 2021

Click Here To Edit

2
Note>Escape
Observations with
Answers</note>

which it is just as possible for Parliament itself to
make laws of itself the law as to keep leave the business to it to be made by
the judicial Power. what power but the judicial
has made the law in the case of libel, sedition,
tort unlawful assembly in &c &c in short all offences which are such only at
Common Law? — to say nothing of larceny, arson &c
where if the punishment is Statute law has interfered more
or less made in the appointment of the punishment
the definition of the offence has been made out purely
by Common Law? In short, what is the whole system
of the Common Law, but a s especially in the penal
branch of it, but a system of ex post-facto legislation?
Driven by necessity, I enable the judicial power to do
do a in a case no ways open to abuse by express commission from the legislative, in a case no
ways open to abuse, what without any such commission
it has been in use to do time out of mind in
a thousand instances, in cases open to abuse in the
highest degree that can be conceived.

As to the controul of a Jury, it exists in one case there is as much of it/it is the same
as much in one case as in the other. My object is to enable them the
Jury to exercise it, with as little difficulty as possible and
danger of mistake, as possible. Where a sufficient
ground for a verdict can be made by the attestation representation
of place a matter of fact cognizable by the senses, I
choose rather to give them the question of plain fact to
judge of than to send them a hunting after intentions,
a chase in which they are but too apt to be
bewildered by false lights.



Identifier: | JB/124/027/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

124

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

027

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / d2 / d3 / d4

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41716

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in