JB/124/028/003: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:37, 29 April 2021

+

As to the jurisdiction, when the punishment comes
to be reduced so low as from life to a single year.
I thought this could be as great danger in trusting preferring to trust
the safety of such an establishment to a jurisdiction not quite so much exposed to
gusts of momentary prejudice or caprice as that
of a common Jury. P Instances I believe are
not wanting where a punishment to this amount
has been trusted to a single Justice: but if it
should be thought better to require two Justices, I
have no objection.

Identifier: \| JB/124/028/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	124	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	028	Info in main headings field	panopticon bill
Image	003	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	3
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	41717
Box Contents

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 <!-- header in pencil -->
-<p>+</p> <p>As to the jurisdiction, when the punishment comes<lb/>to be reduced so low as from life to a single year.<lb/>I thought this could be as great danger in <del><gap/></del> <add>preferring to trust</add><lb/><Add>the safety of such an establishment</add> to a jurisdiction not quite so much exposed to<lb/>gusts of momentary prejudice or caprice as that<lb/>of a common Jury.  <del>I</del> Instances I believe are<lb/>not wanting where a punishment to this amount<lb/>has been trusted to a single Justice: but if it<lb/>should be thought better to require two Justices, I<lb/>have no objection.</p>
+<p>+</p> <p>As to the jurisdiction, when the punishment comes<lb/>to be reduced so low as from life to a single year.<lb/>I thought this could be as great danger in <del>trusting</del> <add>preferring to trust</add><lb/><del><gap/></del> <add>the safety of such an establishment</add> to a jurisdiction not quite so much exposed to<lb/>gusts of momentary prejudice or caprice as that<lb/>of a common Jury.  <del>P</del> Instances I believe are<lb/>not wanting where a punishment to this amount<lb/>has been trusted to a single Justice: but if it<lb/>should be thought better to require two Justices, I<lb/>have no objection.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/124/028/003: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:37, 29 April 2021

Navigation

Search