★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- header in pencil --> | |||
<p>5 <note>5</note><lb/>Panopticon Bill Choice <note>Reasons</note></p> <p>A new choice could <del>therefore</del> not therefore<lb/><del>be made</del> with any propriety <add>be made</add> without <del><gap/><lb/>giving a deal of trouble to</del> <add><sic>encreasing</sic> a load</del> imposing a second load upon</add> some of the first persons<lb/>of the Kingdom, whose time could very ill be<lb/>spared. It cost three years to get from them<lb/>a first choice: <del>what would it</del> how much <add>more</add> time would<lb/>it cost to get a second? What spot <del>were it</del> <add>too would it be</add><lb/><del>expected they should choose?</del> <add>expected of them to choose?</add> The same spot?<lb/>It would be <foreign><hi rend="underline">actum agere</hi></foreign>: a solemn and expensive<lb/>farce. A different spot? — but why a different<lb/>one? They must condemn their predecessors: they<lb/>must condemn themselves: for <add>in respect of</add> a considerable <del>part</del><lb/> <add>if not a greater part</add> of the number, <del>if not the majority</del> the body is<lb/><add>still</add> composed of the same members. They must pass<lb/>condemnation <add>then</add> on the former choice:<!-- all brackets in pencil --> [<del>and be what to<lb/>what purpose? and</del>] <add>but</add> on what grounds? and to<lb/>what purpose? [I am sure I know not.]</p> <p>Will it be said that the <del>neg</del> neighbourhood was<lb/><del>not</del. <Add><del>the</del> not on that occasion<a/dd> sufficiently considered? the pleasurableness<lb/>of the <del>neighbourhood</del> <add>situation</add>, and the tasks and feelings<lb/>of its inhabitants? — That can not be. A prior<lb/>choice had <Add>actually</add. been made: that prior choice rejected<lb/>by this very tribunal, <del><gap/></del> <add>and</add> on this very ground of objection;<lb/><Add>and<?add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
5 5
Panopticon Bill Choice Reasons
A new choice could therefore not therefore
be made with any propriety be made without
giving a deal of trouble to encreasing a load imposing a second load upon some of the first persons
of the Kingdom, whose time could very ill be
spared. It cost three years to get from them
a first choice: what would it how much more time would
it cost to get a second? What spot were it too would it be
expected they should choose? expected of them to choose? The same spot?
It would be actum agere: a solemn and expensive
farce. A different spot? — but why a different
one? They must condemn their predecessors: they
must condemn themselves: for in respect of a considerable part
if not a greater part of the number, if not the majority the body is
still composed of the same members. They must pass
condemnation then on the former choice: [and be what to
what purpose? and] but on what grounds? and to
what purpose? [I am sure I know not.]
Will it be said that the neg neighbourhood was
not</del. <Add>the not on that occasion<a/dd> sufficiently considered? the pleasurableness
of the neighbourhood situation, and the tasks and feelings
of its inhabitants? — That can not be. A prior
choice had actually</add. been made: that prior choice rejected
by this very tribunal, <add>and on this very ground of objection;
<Add>and<?add>
|
Identifier: | JB/124/034/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
124 |
panopticon |
||
|
034 |
panopticon bill choice |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
d5 / d6 / d7 / d8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
41723 |
|||
