★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/010/039/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/010/039/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
exemplified for the designation of which<lb/>no appellation is to be found in our books.<lb/>If no persons more than one can be proved<lb/>to have been acting in the commission of it there<lb/>is no hope of remedy. But suppose two concerned<lb/>here you have a conspiracy: thereupon<lb/>the counsel before whom the case is laid<lb/>looks into his books; and if he thinks he has<lb/>found a case bearing a sufficient resemblance<lb/>to that in question he advises the preferring<lb/>a bill of indictment as for a conspiracy.<lb/>But under an indictment, be the injury<lb/>what it may, no satisfaction whatsoever<lb/>except that vindictive satisfaction, which if<lb/>it inflicts punishment it can not keep from<lb/>him, is offended by the law. True it is, as in<lb/>some cases, an action called an action in<lb/>the nature of a conspiracy, or by some such<lb/><unclear>circumvendelius</unclear> has been admitted. To the details<lb/>of these matters I can not pretend to speak<lb/>but what I can say with confidence is — that<lb/>as on the one hand the field of the prosecution<lb/>called an indictment for a conspiracy<lb/>falls very far short of being coextensive with<lb/>that part of the field of mischief which belongs<lb/>to the field of penal law so on the other hand<lb/>the action in the nature of an indictment<lb/>for a conspiracy falls short more or less<pb/>of being co-extensive with the indictment<lb/>for that offence: nor sh<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <!-- should --> I expect to find that<lb/>in that case unless the offence be proved upon<lb/>two <sic>offendors</sic> the<del>y</del> action may be maintained:<lb/>and all this while for any information that can<lb/>ever happen to the persons in question to obtain<lb/>— I mean the persons exposed to the temptation<lb/>of committing the offence, and the persons exposed<lb/>to the danger of suffering from it, as well<lb/>might the proceedings be carried on in the<lb/>moon as where they are.<lb/>In the two cases above exemplified viz<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> <!-- Latin abbreviation for videlicet, that is to say --><lb/>that of simple mental injuries and that of <del>impositio</del><lb/>wrongful imposition of expense I should<lb/>not be surprised to find in each field here | exemplified for the designation of which<lb/>no appellation is to be found in our books.<lb/>If no persons more than one can be proved<lb/>to have been acting in the commission of it there<lb/>is no hope of remedy. But suppose two concerned<lb/>here you have a conspiracy: thereupon<lb/>the counsel before whom the case is laid<lb/>looks into his books; and if he thinks he has<lb/>found a case bearing a sufficient resemblance<lb/>to that in question he advises the preferring<lb/>a bill of indictment as for a conspiracy.<lb/>But under an indictment, be the injury<lb/>what it may, no satisfaction whatsoever<lb/>except that vindictive satisfaction, which if<lb/>it inflicts punishment it can not keep from<lb/>him, is offended by the law. True it is, as in<lb/>some cases, an action called an action in<lb/>the nature of a conspiracy, or by some such<lb/><unclear>circumvendelius</unclear> has been admitted. To the details<lb/>of these matters I can not pretend to speak<lb/>but what I can say with confidence is — that<lb/>as on the one hand the field of the prosecution<lb/>called an indictment for a conspiracy<lb/>falls very far short of being coextensive with<lb/>that part of the field of mischief which belongs<lb/>to the field of penal law so on the other hand<lb/>the action in the nature of an indictment<lb/>for a conspiracy falls short more or less<pb/>of being co-extensive with the indictment<lb/>for that offence: nor sh<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <!-- should --> I expect to find that<lb/>in that case unless the offence be proved upon<lb/>two <sic>offendors</sic> the<del>y</del> action may be maintained:<lb/>and all this while for any information that can<lb/>ever happen to the persons in question to obtain<lb/>— I mean the persons exposed to the temptation<lb/>of committing the offence, and the persons exposed<lb/>to the danger of suffering from it, as well<lb/>might the proceedings be carried on in the<lb/>moon as where they are.<lb/>In the two cases above exemplified viz<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> <!-- Latin abbreviation for videlicet, that is to say --><lb/>that of simple mental injuries and that of <del>impositio</del><lb/>wrongful imposition of expense I should<lb/>not be surprised to find in each field here &<lb/>there a spot taken possession of by an indictment<lb/>as for a conspiracy, possibly even by<lb/>an action as for a conspiracy: and now if<lb/>on either of these two heads I have succeeded my<lb/>dear Dumont in making myself intelligible &<lb/>paying obedience to your commands so much<lb/>the better.<lb/>Attenuation (Anglice extenuation) 1. drunkenness.<lb/>Never was this intended to take place as<lb/>of courses generally speaking indeed it my<lb/>be true, that <add>that</add> mischief a man does when<lb/> | ||
Click Here To Edit
exemplified for the designation of which
no appellation is to be found in our books.
If no persons more than one can be proved
to have been acting in the commission of it there
is no hope of remedy. But suppose two concerned
here you have a conspiracy: thereupon
the counsel before whom the case is laid
looks into his books; and if he thinks he has
found a case bearing a sufficient resemblance
to that in question he advises the preferring
a bill of indictment as for a conspiracy.
But under an indictment, be the injury
what it may, no satisfaction whatsoever
except that vindictive satisfaction, which if
it inflicts punishment it can not keep from
him, is offended by the law. True it is, as in
some cases, an action called an action in
the nature of a conspiracy, or by some such
circumvendelius has been admitted. To the details
of these matters I can not pretend to speak
but what I can say with confidence is — that
as on the one hand the field of the prosecution
called an indictment for a conspiracy
falls very far short of being coextensive with
that part of the field of mischief which belongs
to the field of penal law so on the other hand
the action in the nature of an indictment
for a conspiracy falls short more or less
---page break---
of being co-extensive with the indictment
for that offence: nor shd I expect to find that
in that case unless the offence be proved upon
two offendors they action may be maintained:
and all this while for any information that can
ever happen to the persons in question to obtain
— I mean the persons exposed to the temptation
of committing the offence, and the persons exposed
to the danger of suffering from it, as well
might the proceedings be carried on in the
moon as where they are.
In the two cases above exemplified vizt
that of simple mental injuries and that of impositio
wrongful imposition of expense I should
not be surprised to find in each field here &
there a spot taken possession of by an indictment
as for a conspiracy, possibly even by
an action as for a conspiracy: and now if
on either of these two heads I have succeeded my
dear Dumont in making myself intelligible &
paying obedience to your commands so much
the better.
Attenuation (Anglice extenuation) 1. drunkenness.
Never was this intended to take place as
of courses generally speaking indeed it my
be true, that that mischief a man does when
Identifier: | JB/010/039/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 10. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
010 |
|||
039 |
|||
002 |
|||
correspondence |
4 |
||
recto |
f13 / f14 / f15 / f16 |
||
john herbert koe |
john dickinson & c<…> 1813 |
||
a. levy |
|||
1813 |
|||
draft of letter 2425, vol. 9 |
3475 |
||