★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
m Protected "JB/078/028/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
(No difference)
|
1826. Novr. 16
Review of Humphreys.
ult.
Ch II. H's eight Projects
§2 Separation useful
Of the separation thus made, , with a view
to practice, is in my view of the matter at least, the importance.
Probability of adoption and dispatch in execution
join in the requisition that of so vast a while the number
of separate party be maximized. Probability of adoption: because
of the separation be aptly oppositely affected, the greater
the number of the p consp arrangements the greater the number of the different
sets if opponents which the influential section of the commonly
is capable of furnishing to the whole together bringing into the field against<add>setting an array</add>, and the greater
the number of the
cause if the whole plan contains two or three parts,
eachboth
of them beneficial to the universal interest, but opposed byrespectively
atwo distinct particular and thence sinister interests
one of them not of itself but with the addition of the other of itself not strong enough to it out but both by other
strong enough to throw it out, their part may one of them may, notwithstanding be carried into
effect: wherein if the separation had not been made, both
sinister interests would have stood opposed to it, and it there we would
have been an end to it, had no chance. Thus stands the matter, in the case
of two and no more mutually unconnected sinister interests: andbut the
greater the number of them, the smaller greater the number of the individuals less the population of each
united by each, united in opposition by eachand the greater accordingly the number of universally beneficial arrangements
the possessing a chance of being carried into effect.
For want of such separation, many are the salutary universally beneficial
proposed arrangements, which if separately proposed would not have been objected to<add>have found no opponent</add> but which by being conjointly proposed, have been lost that have been
2. Then as to dispatch: of appositely made the further the separation if ap
made is carried, the greater the number of appropriately apt hands or sets of hands
among which it in the may be distributed.
Then again as to appropriate aptitude: the further the separation
is carried, the greater the chance of finding a hand or set of hands, in <add>each or </add> ain a superior degree apt.
For each one through their
each of them for one part though
they would not respectively
been equally so for any other
Identifier: | JB/078/028/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-11-16 |
|||
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
028 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
E2 |
||
25119 |
|||