JB/121/434/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/434/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/434/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/434/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
The <add>general</add> <gap/> so clear and undisguised and if the particular<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<unclear>result</unclear> fall short of it and was at variance with it <add>and <unclear>failed</unclear> of corresponding with it</add><lb/>
<del>it was only</del> the discrepancy was <del>only one of of the</del> <add><del>but</del> nothing more</add><lb/>
<del>number</del> <add>than an</add> of those inconsistencies, <del>of which the composition</del><lb/>
the number of which are so many and numerous in<lb/>
such of the compositions of Mr King and his Duke as<lb/>
they have not been able to support.  After so much<lb/>
<gap/> to find a ground and <unclear>construct</unclear> for <del>reduction</del> <add>reducing</add><lb/>
<del>the number of</del> <add>the number to its lowest <unclear>pitch,</unclear></add> 2150 was the lowest that at that<lb/>
time Mr King had been able to find.  I could indeed<lb/>
have helped him to a much lower: were the already<lb/>
settled number of 1000 as per draught of Contract: <hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> but <add>even</add> that of 2150 was a reduced number in comparison of that which <del>would have resulted</del> (as is shown in my paper <gap/> <unclear>P</unclear>) wold have recalled from a fair use of the data that were to be had</note><lb/>
but <add>and</add> which he was labouring to






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 01:11, 1 June 2021

'Click Here To Edit The general so clear and undisguised and if the particular
result fall short of it and was at variance with it and failed of corresponding with it
it was only the discrepancy was only one of of the but nothing more
number than an of those inconsistencies, of which the composition
the number of which are so many and numerous in
such of the compositions of Mr King and his Duke as
they have not been able to support. After so much
to find a ground and construct for reduction reducing
the number of the number to its lowest pitch, 2150 was the lowest that at that
time Mr King had been able to find. I could indeed
have helped him to a much lower: were the already
settled number of 1000 as per draught of Contract: but even that of 2150 was a reduced number in comparison of that which would have resulted (as is shown in my paper P) wold have recalled from a fair use of the data that were to be had
but and which he was labouring to




Identifier: | JB/121/434/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-03-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

21 continued

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

434

Info in main headings field

Dispensing Power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F29

Penner

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in