★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824. <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 8<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure its ends<lb/>S.</note></p> <!-- in pencil --> <p>4 (2)</p> <p><note>5<lb/>In existing system<lb/>profit yielding suits<lb/.maximized profitless<lb/>minimized</note></p> <p>Now as to what in relation to this subject is<lb/>required by the <gap/> ends of judicature; <add><gap/></add> required with<lb/>more or less energy and effect in <del>the</del>every as yet known<lb/>system of judicature, but with most of all by the<lb/>English</p> <p>In regard to the number of suits the ends of judicature<lb/>as above explained that the number of <add>Lawyers</add> profits <gap/><lb/>such <del>the</del> sincere <del<gap/></del> <add>and</add> insincere in <add>no clear proportion</add> <gap/> be maximized,<lb/><del>Of</del> that of profitless suits minimized.</p> <p><note>6<lb/>Profit yielding <add>suits</add> maximization<lb/>Reason the case<lb/>speaks for itself</note></p> <p>Thus the number of Lawyers profit yielding suits<lb/>be maximized? why? Because — but <add><gap/> to the cause</add> the case speaks<lb/>for itself: lawyer labour and lawyers profit proportionate</p> <p><note>7<lb/>Profit minimized<lb/> — Reason labour<lb/>?no profit to Lawyers</note></p> <p>That the number of profitable suits be minimized?<lb/>why? Because for every such suit then would lawyers<lb/>labour if any were employed, <add>if such as were employed</add> and as lawyers profit to<lb/><gap/> it.</p> <p><note>8<lb/>So it will be as long<lb/>as Judges not paid by<lb/>the public</note></p> <p>The lawyers whose only pay <add>profit if any</add> comes from the parties<lb/>and could not be compelled to serve the parties would of course<lb/>if the inducement were taken away, have <gap/> <add><gap/></add> and escape<lb/>from the service. <add>State of</add> Judges is paid by the public, and<lb/>on condition of not <gap/> any thing from the parties, would<lb/>the interest and <gap/> would of course prompt them to<lb/>wish that such so circumstanced <add>then <gap/></add> the number should be <gap/>:<lb/>but they could not as the <gap/> lawyers could<lb/>so far as regarded such a <gap/> of <gap/> they would have<lb/>been <gap/> reduce it to nothing.</p> <p><note>9<lb/>By law <gap/><lb/>suits reduced</note></p> <p>By law <del><gap/> to <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>taxes</add> profitless suits are<lb/>reduced, but lawyers profit yielding such in a certain proportion reduced<lb/>with them By law fees, profitless <del><gap/></del> suits are reduced, <add><gap/> and <add>lawyer</add> profit yielding<lb/><add>such</add> <lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> suits are reduced, yet in<lb/><del><gap/></del> so far as limits are<lb/>set to rapacity by procedure<lb/>the balance in the profit<lb/>set is <gap/></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1824. Decr 8
Procedure Code
Ch. Procedure its ends
S.</note>
4 (2)
5
In existing system
profit yielding suits<lb/.maximized profitless
minimized
Now as to what in relation to this subject is
required by the ends of judicature; required with
more or less energy and effect in theevery as yet known
system of judicature, but with most of all by the
English
In regard to the number of suits the ends of judicature
as above explained that the number of Lawyers profits
such the sincere <del and insincere in no clear proportion be maximized,
Of that of profitless suits minimized.
6
Profit yielding suits maximization
Reason the case
speaks for itself
Thus the number of Lawyers profit yielding suits
be maximized? why? Because — but to the cause the case speaks
for itself: lawyer labour and lawyers profit proportionate
7
Profit minimized
— Reason labour
?no profit to Lawyers
That the number of profitable suits be minimized?
why? Because for every such suit then would lawyers
labour if any were employed, if such as were employed and as lawyers profit to
it.
8
So it will be as long
as Judges not paid by
the public
The lawyers whose only pay profit if any comes from the parties
and could not be compelled to serve the parties would of course
if the inducement were taken away, have and escape
from the service. State of Judges is paid by the public, and
on condition of not any thing from the parties, would
the interest and would of course prompt them to
wish that such so circumstanced then the number should be :
but they could not as the lawyers could
so far as regarded such a of they would have
been reduce it to nothing.
9
By law
suits reduced
By law to taxes profitless suits are
reduced, but lawyers profit yielding such in a certain proportion reduced
with them By law fees, profitless suits are reduced, and <add>lawyer profit yielding
such
suits are reduced, yet in
so far as limits are
set to rapacity by procedure
the balance in the profit
set is
|
Identifier: | JB/052/175/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-12-08 |
5-9 |
||
|
052 |
procedure code |
||
|
175 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c4 / c2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
16848 |
|||
