JB/052/175/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/175/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/052/175/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1824. <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 8<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure its ends<lb/>S.</note></p> <!-- in pencil --> <p>4 (2)</p> <p><note>5<lb/>In existing system<lb/>profit yielding suits<lb/>maximized profitless<lb/>minimized</note></p> <p>Now as to what in relation to this subject is<lb/>required by the <unclear>actual</unclear> ends of judicature; <add><gap/></add> required with<lb/>more or less energy and effect in <del>the</del> every as yet known<lb/>system of judicature, but with most of all by the<lb/>English</p> <p>In regard to the number of suits the ends of judicature<lb/>as above explained that the number of <add>Lawyers</add> profits yielding<lb/>such <del>the</del> sincere <del>or</del> <add>and</add> insincere in <add>in what proportion</add> no <gap/> be maximized.<lb/><del>Of</del> that of profitless suits minimized.</p> <p><note>6<lb/>Profit yielding <add>suits</add> maximization<lb/>Reason &#x2014; the case<lb/>speaks for itself</note></p> <p>Thus the number of Lawyers profit yielding suits<lb/>be maximized? why? Because &#x2014; but <add>as to the cause</add> the case speaks<lb/>for itself: lawyer labour and lawyers profit proportionate</p> <p><note>7<lb/>Profitless minimized<lb/> &#x2014; Reason labour<lb/>no profit to Lawyers</note></p> <p>That the number of profitable suits be minimized?<lb/>why?  Because for every such suit then would lawyers<lb/>labour if any were employed, <add>if such as were employed</add> and as lawyers profit to<lb/>sweeten it.</p> <p><note>8<lb/>So it will be as long<lb/>as Judges not paid by<lb/>the public</note></p> <p>The lawyers whose only pay <add>profit if any</add> comes from the parties<lb/>and could not be compelled to serve the parties would of course<lb/>if the inducement were taken away, have their backs <add>to</add> and escape<lb/>from the service.  <add>State of</add> Judges if paid by the public, and<lb/>on condition of not receiving any thing from the parties, would<lb/>their interest and <gap/> would of course prompt them to<lb/>wish that <add>of</add> suits so circumstanced <add>thus <gap/></add> the number should be minimized:<lb/>but they could not as the <gap/> lawyers could,<lb/>so far as regarded such a <gap/> of <gap/> they would have<lb/>been <gap/> reduce it to nothing.</p> <p><note>9<lb/>By law profit<del>yielding</del><add>less</add><lb/>suits reduced</note></p> <p>By low <del>fees to <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>taxes</add> profitless suits are<lb/>reduced, but lawyers profit yielding such in a certain proportion reduced<lb/>with them  By low fees, profitless <del><gap/></del> suits are reduced, <add><gap/></add> and <add>lawyer</add> profit yielding<lb/><add>suits</add> <lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> suits are reduced, yet in<lb/><del><gap/></del> so far as limits are<lb/>set to rapacity by procedure<lb/>the balance on the profit<lb/>side is <sic>encreased</sic></p>   
<head>1824. <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 8<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure its ends<lb/>S.</note></p> <!-- in pencil --> <p>4 (2)</p> <p><note>5<lb/>In existing system<lb/>profit yielding suits<lb/>maximized profitless<lb/>minimized</note></p> <p>Now as to what in relation to this subject is<lb/>required by the <unclear>actual</unclear> ends of judicature; required <add>sought</add> with<lb/>more or less energy and effect in <del>the</del> every as yet known<lb/>system of judicature, but with most of all by the<lb/>English</p> <p>In regard to the number of suits the ends of judicature<lb/>as above explained that the number of <add>Lawyers</add> profits yielding<lb/>such <del>the</del> sincere <del>or</del> <add>and</add> insincere no <unclear>matter</unclear> <add>in what proportion</add> be maximized.<lb/><del>Of</del> that of profitless suits minimized.</p> <p><note>6<lb/>Profit yielding <add>suits</add> maximization<lb/>Reason &#x2014; the case<lb/>speaks for itself</note></p> <p>Thus the number of Lawyers profit yielding suits<lb/>be maximized? why? Because &#x2014; but <add>as to the cause</add> the case speaks<lb/>for itself: lawyer labour and lawyers profit proportionate</p> <p><note>7<lb/>Profitless minimized<lb/> &#x2014; Reason labour<lb/>no profit to Lawyers</note></p> <p>That the number of profitable suits be minimized?<lb/>why?  Because for every such suit then would lawyers<lb/>labour if any were employed, <add>if such as were employed</add> and as lawyers profit to<lb/>sweeten it.</p> <p><note>8<lb/>So it will be as long<lb/>as Judges not paid by<lb/>the public</note></p> <p>The lawyers whose only pay <add>profit if any</add> comes from the parties<lb/>and could not be compelled to serve the parties would of course<lb/>if the inducement were taken away, have their backs <add>to</add> and escape<lb/>from the service.  <add>State of</add> Judges if paid by the public, and<lb/>on condition of not receiving any thing from the parties, would<lb/>their interest and inclination would of course prompt them to<lb/>wish that <add>of</add> suits so circumstanced <add>thus <gap/></add> the number should be minimized:<lb/>but they could not as the <gap/> lawyers could,<lb/>so far as regarded suits in which if instituted they would have<lb/>been concerned, reduce it to nothing.</p> <p><note>9<lb/>By law profit<del>yielding</del><add>less</add><lb/>suits reduced</note></p> <p>By low <del>fees to <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>taxes</add> profitless suits are<lb/>reduced, but lawyers profit yielding such in a certain proportion reduced<lb/>with them  By low fees, profitless <del><gap/></del> suits are reduced, <add>then</add> such <add>lawyer</add> profit yielding<lb/><add>suits</add> <lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> suits are reduced, yet in<lb/><del><gap/></del> so far as limits are<lb/>set to rapacity by procedure<lb/>the balance on the profit<lb/>side is <sic>encreased</sic></p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 09:31, 2 June 2021

Click Here To Edit

1824. Decr 8
Procedure Code

Ch. Procedure its ends
S.

4 (2)

5
In existing system
profit yielding suits
maximized profitless
minimized

Now as to what in relation to this subject is
required by the actual ends of judicature; required sought with
more or less energy and effect in the every as yet known
system of judicature, but with most of all by the
English

In regard to the number of suits the ends of judicature
as above explained that the number of Lawyers profits yielding
such the sincere or and insincere no matter in what proportion be maximized.
Of that of profitless suits minimized.

6
Profit yielding suits maximization
Reason — the case
speaks for itself

Thus the number of Lawyers profit yielding suits
be maximized? why? Because — but as to the cause the case speaks
for itself: lawyer labour and lawyers profit proportionate

7
Profitless minimized
— Reason labour
no profit to Lawyers

That the number of profitable suits be minimized?
why? Because for every such suit then would lawyers
labour if any were employed, if such as were employed and as lawyers profit to
sweeten it.

8
So it will be as long
as Judges not paid by
the public

The lawyers whose only pay profit if any comes from the parties
and could not be compelled to serve the parties would of course
if the inducement were taken away, have their backs to and escape
from the service. State of Judges if paid by the public, and
on condition of not receiving any thing from the parties, would
their interest and inclination would of course prompt them to
wish that of suits so circumstanced thus the number should be minimized:
but they could not as the lawyers could,
so far as regarded suits in which if instituted they would have
been concerned, reduce it to nothing.

9
By law profityieldingless
suits reduced

By low fees to taxes profitless suits are
reduced, but lawyers profit yielding such in a certain proportion reduced
with them By low fees, profitless suits are reduced, then such lawyer profit yielding
suits
suits are reduced, yet in
so far as limits are
set to rapacity by procedure
the balance on the profit
side is encreased




Identifier: | JB/052/175/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1824-12-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-9

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

175

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16848

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in