JB/042/139/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/139/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1825. Decr 12
Constitutional Code
Ch. XII
S.5. Number
S.5. Anglici
VII..4
23 An
Art. Bad for rectifying honest errors,
no other imaginable
Judicatory can be so
unfit.
1. Members the vast
majority ignorant of
the Law, destitute of
appropriate knowledge.
2. Destitute of judicial
aptitude by indolence
and carelessness, the
necessary concomitant
of preeminent opulence.
3. Thence also destitute
of appropriate active
aptitude.
4. By extensiveness
of private connection
preeminently exposed
to corrupt partiality.
VII.5
24.
Art 24. Obligation of
attendance none:
those alone attend who
are brought thither
by the influence of
some particular and
sinister interest.
VII.7
25.
Art 25. Instead of being
confined to the
alone extraordinary
case, there is not a
case or in
non-penal matter that
may not be brought
before it, if the party
who loses in the next
subordinate Judicatory
has ability and
will  to bear the
expense.<pb/>
 
S.5 Number
S.5. Anglici
VII.8
26.
Art. 26. To crown the
absurdity, the Chancellor
has the direction of this
Judicatory of which the
chief occupation is the
sitting in judgement
on his decisions: a
complete mockery of
justice.
VII.9
27.
Art 27. For proof of the
utter unprincipledness
and inconsistency as
to this point, and consequent
inaptitude of
the practice, any further
detail is needless: and
the excessive complicatedness
of the machinery
renders it impracticable.
VII 10
28. West in COnts
Art 28. Think of four
Judges in the King's Bench
taking cognizance of a
hodge-podge mixture of civil and
penal suits: for a Common
Pleas, of a scrap
of a hodge podge of Civil
suits. Exchequer, of
another scrap of another
hodge podge mixture.
VIII.11
29.
Art 29.  For the most lengthy
penal suits, a single
Judge, with a Jury sufficient
every where but in
the Metropolis: necessary
there, a Judicatory, composed,
in addition to the
Jury, of a mixture of
Lawyer Judges, and of Non-
Lawyer JUdges, both in
variable members, attendance
of or non-attendance
governed in
all but one by individual
convenience as in the House of Lords.<pb/>
 
Ch.XII
S.5
S.5 Anglici
VII.11
30 Just Peace londs
Art 31. Think then of
the Justice of Peace
Indicatories. Number
of seats in some cases
one, in otherstwo, or
a greater number, as
it may happen, as in
the Petty Sessions: this then
partly for immediate cognizance,
partly for appeal
- in Quarter Sessions
an unlimited number:
in all the Judicatories,
the Judges acting
under the corruption
produced by other parties
powers, incompatible
with the Judicial
Code. and by sinster
interest, of all sorts,
which the power enables
them to promote
The eye loses itself
in the labyrinth
by this chaos.
VIII.1 31.
Art. 31. Unavoidable
entangled with the
matter of the Procedure
Code is the discussion
on an this point: further
it can not has
been brought to view.<pb/>
 
Ch.XII Judiciary Collectively
S>5. Number in a Judicatory not now than on <pb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 14:44, 8 June 2021

Click Here To Edit

1825. Decr 12 Constitutional Code Ch. XII S.5. Number S.5. Anglici VII..4 23 An Art. Bad for rectifying honest errors, no other imaginable Judicatory can be so unfit. 1. Members the vast majority ignorant of the Law, destitute of appropriate knowledge. 2. Destitute of judicial aptitude by indolence and carelessness, the necessary concomitant of preeminent opulence. 3. Thence also destitute of appropriate active aptitude. 4. By extensiveness of private connection preeminently exposed to corrupt partiality. VII.5 24. Art 24. Obligation of attendance none: those alone attend who are brought thither by the influence of some particular and sinister interest. VII.7 25. Art 25. Instead of being confined to the alone extraordinary case, there is not a case or in non-penal matter that may not be brought before it, if the party who loses in the next subordinate Judicatory has ability and will to bear the expense.
---page break---

S.5 Number S.5. Anglici VII.8 26. Art. 26. To crown the absurdity, the Chancellor has the direction of this Judicatory of which the chief occupation is the sitting in judgement on his decisions: a complete mockery of justice. VII.9 27. Art 27. For proof of the utter unprincipledness and inconsistency as to this point, and consequent inaptitude of the practice, any further detail is needless: and the excessive complicatedness of the machinery renders it impracticable. VII 10 28. West in COnts Art 28. Think of four Judges in the King's Bench taking cognizance of a hodge-podge mixture of civil and penal suits: for a Common Pleas, of a scrap of a hodge podge of Civil suits. Exchequer, of another scrap of another hodge podge mixture. VIII.11 29. Art 29. For the most lengthy penal suits, a single Judge, with a Jury sufficient every where but in the Metropolis: necessary there, a Judicatory, composed, in addition to the Jury, of a mixture of Lawyer Judges, and of Non- Lawyer JUdges, both in variable members, attendance of or non-attendance governed in all but one by individual convenience as in the House of Lords.
---page break---

Ch.XII S.5 S.5 Anglici VII.11 30 Just Peace londs Art 31. Think then of the Justice of Peace Indicatories. Number of seats in some cases one, in otherstwo, or a greater number, as it may happen, as in the Petty Sessions: this then partly for immediate cognizance, partly for appeal - in Quarter Sessions an unlimited number: in all the Judicatories, the Judges acting under the corruption produced by other parties powers, incompatible with the Judicial Code. and by sinster interest, of all sorts, which the power enables them to promote The eye loses itself in the labyrinth by this chaos. VIII.1 31. Art. 31. Unavoidable entangled with the matter of the Procedure Code is the discussion on an this point: further it can not has been brought to view.
---page break---

Ch.XII Judiciary Collectively S>5. Number in a Judicatory not now than on
---page break---







Identifier: | JB/042/139/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-12-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

23-31

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

139

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

[[notes_public::"relates to judges only: not to minister" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

13062

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in