JB/052/225/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/225/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/052/225/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1825. <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> 13<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- page numbers in pencil --> <p>5<lb/><note><sic>General Rules</note><lb/>(5 <note> &sect;.3. Inflexible rules, none.</note></p> <p><note>18<lb/>Examples of <add>evils of</add> inflexibility<lb/>as to quantity</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> For instance  <add>exemplification</add> of the evil truth to be <add>certain of being</add><lb/>produced by <del>f</del> inflexible rules in regard to quantity<lb/>take the two cases <!-- brackets in pencil --> (of) <add>the <gap/> object</add> &#x2014; matter of satisfaction matter of</add> <hi rend="underline">punishment</hi> and <del><hi rend="underline">more</hi></del> length of time</p> <p><note>19<lb/>1 as to matter of<lb/>compensation</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> <!-- brackets in pencil --> [Rule] First as to matter of <add>quantity of the</add><lb/>compensation or the means of satisfaction.  if there be a<lb/>casein which <add>of</add> the compensation thus inflexibly <sic>fixt</sic> the quantity<lb/>be <del>such</del> <add>deficient</add> &#x2014; a <gap/> sort <add>deficient as to be</add> inferior to the profit obtainable by<lb/>the wrong, it operates by the amount of the difference, as an<lb/>inducement to <sic>committ</sic> the wrong, instead of operating as a<lb/>means of repression for the prevention of it.</p> <p><note>20<lb/>2 So as to punishment</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> So likewise in the case of<lb/>punishment.  If in <del><gap/></del> the case of any crime, the punishment<lb/>in all things taken together is clearly inferior to the profit<lb/>obtainable in the individual <gap/> in question by means of<lb/>the crime, the <add>effect of the</add> so called punishment is to <gap/> to wit<lb/>by the amount of the difference not as a repression <add>bond</add> for the prevention<lb/.but as an incentive, and encouragement towards the commission<lb/>of the crime.  To one offence by which in the individual<lb/>case in question the <gap/> has gained £100 but<lb/>£10 and as never have been the <gap/> first <add>in</add. <del>or</del> the obligation<lb/>of paying what constitutes the sole punishment in pounds &#x2014;<lb/>the effect of the law is to operate as a bounty upon the commission<lb/>of the prohibited act of the act thus <gap/> <add><gap/></add><lb/>prohibited as a bounty to the amount of £90 subject unto <add>deducting</add><lb/>to the deduction of the <del>costs <gap/></del> <sic>expence</sic> and the <gap/> for<lb/>the vexation in the shape attached to the situation of defendant in these<lb/>cases.</p> <p>N.B. In the instance of satisfaction and <gap/><lb/>provision against the <gap/> in this shape belongs <gap/><lb/>to the fired of penal law not directly to the fields of judicial<lb/>procedure.  Of this in procedure in this shape the marks are <add>in a</add> particular degree conspicuous in<lb/>Bonaparte Codes.</p>       
<head>1825. <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> 13<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- page numbers in pencil --> <p>5<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> General Rules</note><lb/>(5 <note> &sect;.3. Inflexible rules, none.</note></p> <p><note>18<lb/>Examples of <add>evils of</add> inflexibility<lb/>as to quantity</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> For instance  <add>exemplification</add> of the evil liable to be <add>certain of being</add><lb/>produced by <del>f</del> inflexible rules in regard to quantity<lb/>take the two cases <!-- brackets in pencil --> (of) <add>the <gap/> object &#x2014; matter of satisfaction &#x2014; matter of</add> <hi rend="underline">punishment</hi> and <del><hi rend="underline">more</hi></del> length of time</p> <p><note>19<lb/>1 as to matter of<lb/>compensation</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> <!-- brackets in pencil --> [Rule] First as to matter of <add>quantity of the</add><lb/>compensation or other means of satisfaction.  If there be a<lb/>case in which <add>of</add> the compensation thus inflexibly <sic>fixt</sic> the quantity<lb/>be <del>such</del> <add>deficient</add> &#x2014; a <unclear>cash</unclear> suit <add>deficient as to be</add> inferior to the profit obtainable by<lb/>the wrong, it operates by the amount of the difference, as an<lb/>inducement to <sic>committ</sic> the wrong, instead of operating as a<lb/>means of repression for the prevention of it.</p> <p><note>20<lb/>2 So as to punishment</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> So likewise in the case of<lb/>punishment.  If in <del><gap/></del> the case of any crime, the punishment<lb/>in all things taken together is clearly inferior to the profit<lb/>obtainable in the individual instance in question by means of<lb/>the crime, the <add>effect of the</add> so called punishment is to operate to wit<lb/>by the amount of the difference not as a repression <add>bond</add> for the prevention<lb/>but as an incentive, and encouragement towards the commission<lb/>of the crime.  To one offence by which in the individual<lb/>case in question the delinquent has gained £100 but<lb/>£10 used no more have been the cases <sic>fixt</sic> <add>in</add> <del>or</del> the obligation<lb/>of paying what constitutes the sole punishment in pounds &#x2014;<lb/>the effect of the law is to operate as a bounty upon the commission<lb/>of the prohibited act of the act thus inexpertly <add>unaptly</add><lb/>prohibited as a bounty to the amount of £90 subject only <add>deducting</add><lb/>to the deduction of the <del>costs <gap/></del> <sic>expence</sic> and the equivalent for<lb/>the vexation in the shape attached to the situation of defendant in these<lb/>cases.</p> <p>N.B. In the instance of satisfaction and punishment<lb/>provision against the improvidence in this shape belongs obviously<lb/>to the field of penal law not directly to the fields of judicial<lb/>procedure.  Of <del>this</del> a procedure in this shape the marks are <add>in a</add> particular degree conspicuous in<lb/>Bonaparte Codes.</p>       






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 10:57, 24 June 2021

Click Here To Edit

1825. Feby. 13
Procedure Code

5
Ch. General Rules
(5 §.3. Inflexible rules, none.

18
Examples of evils of inflexibility
as to quantity

Art. For instance exemplification of the evil liable to be certain of being
produced by f inflexible rules in regard to quantity
take the two cases (of) the object — matter of satisfaction — matter of punishment and more length of time

19
1 as to matter of
compensation

Art. [Rule] First as to matter of quantity of the
compensation or other means of satisfaction. If there be a
case in which of the compensation thus inflexibly fixt the quantity
be such deficient — a cash suit deficient as to be inferior to the profit obtainable by
the wrong, it operates by the amount of the difference, as an
inducement to committ the wrong, instead of operating as a
means of repression for the prevention of it.

20
2 So as to punishment

Art. So likewise in the case of
punishment. If in the case of any crime, the punishment
in all things taken together is clearly inferior to the profit
obtainable in the individual instance in question by means of
the crime, the effect of the so called punishment is to operate to wit
by the amount of the difference not as a repression bond for the prevention
but as an incentive, and encouragement towards the commission
of the crime. To one offence by which in the individual
case in question the delinquent has gained £100 but
£10 used no more have been the cases fixt in or the obligation
of paying what constitutes the sole punishment in pounds —
the effect of the law is to operate as a bounty upon the commission
of the prohibited act of the act thus inexpertly unaptly
prohibited as a bounty to the amount of £90 subject only deducting
to the deduction of the costs expence and the equivalent for
the vexation in the shape attached to the situation of defendant in these
cases.

N.B. In the instance of satisfaction and punishment
provision against the improvidence in this shape belongs obviously
to the field of penal law not directly to the fields of judicial
procedure. Of this a procedure in this shape the marks are in a particular degree conspicuous in
Bonaparte Codes.




Identifier: | JB/052/225/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1825-02-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

18-20

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

225

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

16898

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in