★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/052/269/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824 <sic>Nov.</sic> 26<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>17<lb/><note><sic>Ch</sic> VI Judiciary Application</note><lb/>(6 <note>§.5 Application commenced<lb/>how.</note></p> <p><note>15<lb/><del>Where</del> <add>In case of</add> information to<lb/>pursue the same course<lb/>for ascertaining the <lb/>nature of the wrong.</note></p> <p>In the case of an information, he will take the same<lb/>course as above for ascertaining the nature of the wrong complained<lb/>of, or the service to which the party in question<lb/>has a right.</p> <p><note>16<lb/>If a wrong he will<lb/>collect information <del>with</del> <add>alone</add><lb/>or in conjunction with<lb/><sic>Gov<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> Advocate</note></p> <p>If it be <del>a per</del> the case of a wrong as it commonly<lb/>will be, and most commonly that of a crime<lb/>he will collect from the informant whether it be or be not <del><gap/><lb/>to</del> desirous or content to be a pursuer, alone or in<lb/>conjunction with some other individual or the Government Advocate<lb/>or both: which done he will | <head>1824 <sic>Nov.</sic> 26<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>17<lb/><note><sic>Ch</sic> VI Judiciary Application</note><lb/>(6 <note>§.5 Application commenced<lb/>how.</note></p> <p><note>15<lb/><del>Where</del> <add>In case of</add> information to<lb/>pursue the same course<lb/>for ascertaining the <lb/>nature of the wrong.</note></p> <p>In the case of an information, he will take the same<lb/>course as above for ascertaining the nature of the wrong complained<lb/>of, or the service to which the party in question<lb/>has a right.</p> <p><note>16<lb/>If a wrong he will<lb/>collect information <del>with</del> <add>alone</add><lb/>or in conjunction with<lb/><sic>Gov<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> Advocate</note></p> <p>If it be <del>a per</del> the case of a wrong as it commonly<lb/>will be, and most commonly that of a crime<lb/>he will collect from the informant whether it be or be not <del><gap/><lb/>to</del> desirous or content to be a pursuer, alone or in<lb/>conjunction with some other individual or the Government Advocate<lb/>or both: which done he will determine as to the complying <add>compliance</add><lb/><add>or non-compliance</add> or not complying with the desire</p> <p><note>17<lb/>In this case to consider<lb/>whether act informed of<lb/>be a criminal act or<lb/>an <add>act</add> evidential <del>act</del> of one</note></p> <p>In this case more particularly <add>especially</add> a particular habit <add>question</add><lb/>to come under consideration will be whether the fact spoken<lb/>to in the information is the criminal <add>forbidden</add> act itself or only in<lb/>fact capable of operating in the character of circumstantial<lb/>evidence: and in both cases, whether according to his account<lb/>the informant was in relation to the fact in question <add>himself</add> a principal<lb/>witness, or whether all he has to <del>say</del> speak to his<lb/>having reason to believe that another person known or unknown<lb/>to him might <add>may</add> probably have been in relation to it a principal<lb/>witness. In this latter case comes the demand for <del>the</del><lb/>investigation, as explained in Chapter .</p> <p><note>18<lb/>No case in which the<lb/>benefit of the investigation<lb/>may not outweigh the<lb/>vexation & <sic>expence</sic></note></p> <p>As already observed there is no sort of case, in<lb/>which there may not be need of such investigatory process, nor<lb/>any in which the <del>employment</del> service rendered to justice by the<lb/>employment of it may not outweigh the vexation <del>of</del> and<lb/><sic>expence.</sic> But in England it not being employed but in cases regarded<lb/>as <del>high</del> belonging to the highest classes of excuses is a judicature into which<lb/>the eye of the public scarcely penetrates, those high classes of cases are the<lb/><add>only</add><lb/><!-- continues in margin -->ones in which the need<lb/>of it can be expected<lb/>to present itself to the<lb/>quantity of readers.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} | ||
1824 Nov. 26
Procedure Code
17
Ch VI Judiciary Application
(6 §.5 Application commenced
how.
15
Where In case of information to
pursue the same course
for ascertaining the
nature of the wrong.
In the case of an information, he will take the same
course as above for ascertaining the nature of the wrong complained
of, or the service to which the party in question
has a right.
16
If a wrong he will
collect information with alone
or in conjunction with
Govt Advocate
If it be a per the case of a wrong as it commonly
will be, and most commonly that of a crime
he will collect from the informant whether it be or be not
to desirous or content to be a pursuer, alone or in
conjunction with some other individual or the Government Advocate
or both: which done he will determine as to the complying compliance
or non-compliance or not complying with the desire
17
In this case to consider
whether act informed of
be a criminal act or
an act evidential act of one
In this case more particularly especially a particular habit question
to come under consideration will be whether the fact spoken
to in the information is the criminal forbidden act itself or only in
fact capable of operating in the character of circumstantial
evidence: and in both cases, whether according to his account
the informant was in relation to the fact in question himself a principal
witness, or whether all he has to say speak to his
having reason to believe that another person known or unknown
to him might may probably have been in relation to it a principal
witness. In this latter case comes the demand for the
investigation, as explained in Chapter .
18
No case in which the
benefit of the investigation
may not outweigh the
vexation & expence
As already observed there is no sort of case, in
which there may not be need of such investigatory process, nor
any in which the employment service rendered to justice by the
employment of it may not outweigh the vexation of and
expence. But in England it not being employed but in cases regarded
as high belonging to the highest classes of excuses is a judicature into which
the eye of the public scarcely penetrates, those high classes of cases are the
only
ones in which the need
of it can be expected
to present itself to the
quantity of readers.
|
Identifier: | JB/052/269/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-11-26 |
15-18 |
||
|
052 |
procedure code |
||
|
269 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d17 / e6 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
16942 |
|||
