JB/015/428/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/015/428/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<p>112</p>
<p>112</p>
<p>Avoid all arguments that you know like sophistical<lb/>
<p>Avoid all arguments that you know like sophistical<lb/>
thenth act <del>that</del> by shutting your own eyes against the weakness of<lb/>
<unclear>thenth</unclear> act <del>that</del> by shutting your own eyes against the weakness of<lb/>
your statements that you have thereby shut the eyes of your hearer.<lb/>
your statements that you have thereby shut the eyes of your hearer.<lb/>
Your sophistry will but initiate, – for sophistry is not only <unclear>uncandid</unclear><lb/>
Your sophistry will but initiate, – for sophistry is not only <unclear>uncandid</unclear><lb/>
but dishonest.  It is an attempt to cheat , not his purse but<lb/>
but dishonest.  It is an attempt to cheat , not his purse but<lb/>
his senses &amp; his judgement. The <unclear>avenue</unclear> to you will be<lb/>
his senses &amp; his judgement. The <unclear>avenue</unclear> to you will be<lb/>
awakened by <add><del>the</del> </add> your <del>attempt</del> <add>effort</add> to <unclear>clam</unclear> at his expense, – &amp<lb/>
awakened by <add><del>the</del> </add> your <del>attempt</del> <add>effort</add> to <unclear>claim</unclear> at his expense, – &amp<lb/>
his contempt will be roused for the <unclear>lawyer</unclear> that supposed<lb/>
his contempt will be roused for the <unclear>lawyer</unclear> that supposed<lb/>
it was able <del>to do so</del> <add>so to shine.</add>  In all argument be candid for the<lb/>
it was able <del>to do so</del> <add>so to shine.</add>  In all argument be candid for the<lb/>
 
sake of your comrade &amp; for your own sake.  The triumph<lb/>
 
of <add>an</add> argument <add>which is</add> thrown &amp; <unclear>fit</unclear> to be unfair &amp; <gap/>, is<lb/>
 
a <del><gap/></del> wretched exhibition of perversity.  If successful, it<lb/>
</p>
can serve no interests but those of fraud – If unsuccessful, it<lb/>
 
brings with it the consequences of blundering &amp; <unclear>selected</unclear><lb/>
 
dishonesty.  Constituted as society is – with its errors &amp; prejudices<lb/>
 
to narrow interests, – &amp; interested passions – the pursuit of<lb/>
truth makes demands enough upon courageous virtue – for<lb/>
he who goes one step beyond the line which the world's <gap/><lb/>
conventions have drawn around moral &amp; political questions – must<lb/>
expect to <gap/> with the thundering anathemas &amp; obloquies of
all who wish to stand well with the arbiters of opinion.  Let<lb/>
no searcher <unclear>after</unclear> truth be led into the labyrinths of sophistry.<lb/>
<del>The course would</del>  He will have enough to do in order to make<lb/>
good his ground one step beyond that trodden by those who<lb/>
dogmatise about decorum – &amp; propriety – and right &amp; wrong –</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 02:20, 30 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

112

Avoid all arguments that you know like sophistical
thenth act that by shutting your own eyes against the weakness of
your statements that you have thereby shut the eyes of your hearer.
Your sophistry will but initiate, – for sophistry is not only uncandid
but dishonest. It is an attempt to cheat , not his purse but
his senses & his judgement. The avenue to you will be
awakened by the your attempt effort to claim at his expense, – &amp
his contempt will be roused for the lawyer that supposed
it was able to do so so to shine. In all argument be candid for the
sake of your comrade & for your own sake. The triumph
of an argument which is thrown & fit to be unfair & , is
a wretched exhibition of perversity. If successful, it
can serve no interests but those of fraud – If unsuccessful, it
brings with it the consequences of blundering & selected
dishonesty. Constituted as society is – with its errors & prejudices
to narrow interests, – & interested passions – the pursuit of
truth makes demands enough upon courageous virtue – for
he who goes one step beyond the line which the world's
conventions have drawn around moral & political questions – must
expect to with the thundering anathemas & obloquies of all who wish to stand well with the arbiters of opinion. Let
no searcher after truth be led into the labyrinths of sophistry.
The course would He will have enough to do in order to make
good his ground one step beyond that trodden by those who
dogmatise about decorum – & propriety – and right & wrong –


Identifier: | JB/015/428/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

428a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 428.

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f112

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5644

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in