★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1823. August 31<lb/><del>Constitutional Code</del> <!-- in pencil --> On Penitentiary For Place</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>(7 <note>Useless or too expensive</note></p> <p>If they had but <sic><unclear>encrease</unclear></sic> with <add>of</add> what | <head>1823. August 31<lb/><del>Constitutional Code</del> <!-- in pencil --> On Penitentiary For Place</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>(7 <note>Useless or too expensive</note></p> <p>If they had but <sic><unclear>encrease</unclear></sic> with <add>of</add> what interest they could have<lb/>Simple <unclear>ever</unclear> to object to those whose <gap/> they <gap/> of<lb/>for being put to shame by the <gap/> proper conduct.</p> <p>As to the perplexity in question either its extent is such<lb/>as Gentlemen's suppose it to be, or it is not. If not the men<lb/>employed by them to combat it could be imperfectly extent; if yes they would be unavailing.</p> <p>In comparison of those who are consigned to punishment<lb/>in this shape by <gap/> of depredation the number of those who<lb/>are consigned by <gap/> costs of all <gap/>, put <lb/>together <unclear>was</unclear> of <add>as willing</add> no account. But liken the propensity in <add>eventual physical appetite</add><lb/>question and the considerable appetite for the makers of <gap/><lb/>or <del>the</del> <gap/> <add>by</add> which <add>it is</add> sharpens it where is the imaginable<lb/>connection? Why should it be stronger is the thousand, those <add>kept</add> <gap/><lb/><add>in confinement</add> then in the millions of individuals in the case case pecuniary<lb/>circumstances who <del>are</del> <gap/> all the the <gap/> that can be taken from<lb/>them <gap/> must be still be <gap/> to be at <gap/>?</p> <p>For the <gap/> hope of diminishing impunity in the</p> <p><del><gap/> the <gap/></del> <gap/> Take the <gap/> this double code — happen then<lb/>all left <add><gap/></add> <gap/> do they suppose they would all practice it? If so<lb/>what does the <gap/> <gap/> now when <unclear>predicted</unclear> of it?</p> <p>Well then to what lesser number do they suppose that <gap/><lb/>difference <add><gap/></add> better means of <gap/> over those which the Panoptiocn<lb/>principle of <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <gap/> the practice would be confined.<lb/>Shall we say <del><gap/> <gap/></del> as behind him behind<lb/>those <unclear>hindered</unclear>.</p> <p>Well but which then <gap/> is <del><gap/></del> in <gap/> <add>in</add> the<lb/> <add>to any</add> will prison without the benefit of any such men to <del>exclu</del><lb/>silence the same preparation is left <gap/>. In these <gap/><lb/>the Panopticon principle with its <gap/> <gap/> ready has no<lb/>place. Had he <gap/> <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> the thing they call <gap/> early<lb/><gap/> all efficacy as willing. Then the while they are<lb/>lessening it <add>the <gap/></add> upon a smaller scale by one <del><gap/></del> <gap/> measure<lb/>be it upon a much larger scale.</p> <p>To one such when in a principle to turn a <gap/> to tell <gap/><lb/>the most <add><gap/></add> <gap/> and <gap/> arguments in <gap/> no man <gap/> than the valuers</p> <p><note>This <gap/> will<lb/><gap/> the religion<lb/>then will <sic>shew</sic> <gap/><lb/>adoring it is to good<lb/>purpose of out and<lb/>intelligible good.</note></p> | ||
1823. August 31
Constitutional Code On Penitentiary For Place
(7 Useless or too expensive
If they had but encrease with of what interest they could have
Simple ever to object to those whose they of
for being put to shame by the proper conduct.
As to the perplexity in question either its extent is such
as Gentlemen's suppose it to be, or it is not. If not the men
employed by them to combat it could be imperfectly extent; if yes they would be unavailing.
In comparison of those who are consigned to punishment
in this shape by of depredation the number of those who
are consigned by costs of all , put
together was of as willing no account. But liken the propensity in eventual physical appetite
question and the considerable appetite for the makers of
or the by which it is sharpens it where is the imaginable
connection? Why should it be stronger is the thousand, those kept
in confinement then in the millions of individuals in the case case pecuniary
circumstances who are all the the that can be taken from
them must be still be to be at ?
For the hope of diminishing impunity in the
the Take the this double code — happen then
all left do they suppose they would all practice it? If so
what does the now when predicted of it?
Well then to what lesser number do they suppose that
difference better means of over those which the Panoptiocn
principle of the practice would be confined.
Shall we say as behind him behind
those hindered.
Well but which then is in in the
to any will prison without the benefit of any such men to exclu
silence the same preparation is left . In these
the Panopticon principle with its ready has no
place. Had he the thing they call early
all efficacy as willing. Then the while they are
lessening it the upon a smaller scale by one measure
be it upon a much larger scale.
To one such when in a principle to turn a to tell
the most and arguments in no man than the valuers
This will
the religion
then will shew
adoring it is to good
purpose of out and
intelligible good.
|
Identifier: | JB/115/152/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 115. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1823-08-31 |
|||
|
115 |
panopticon |
||
|
152 |
on penitentiary for place |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1822 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1822 |
|||
|
37527 |
|||
