JB/042/145/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/042/145/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1827. Nov2.
Constitutional Code.
1.
Art.5. Chief difference
between this and ordinary
Judicatories in
the natural degree
of natural promptitude:
and in Judge's
situation.
2.
In these cases, time
for calling in the ordinary
Judge can not be
waited for, besides that
the ordinary Judge might
have less cognitional
aptitude.
3.
Security from maximization
of facility of
Appeal.
4.
Art.7. Two other excepted
judicatories styled
in English practice Audit
Court and Court
of claims.
5.
Characteristic difference
from ordinary
Judicatories, common
to both, the event of
a party.
6.
In Audit Courts, no
pursuer. in Courts
of Claim no Defendant.
Judicature performed
in Audit Courts the
calling debtors to account:
the question
being whether an admitted
debt has been
discharged or not.<pb/>
 
7.
In ordinary debt
causes, claims on this
ground carried on
promiscuously, with
others. In this case,
suits on this ground
alone.
8.
In English practice,
the only instance in
which Courts of this
kind established, that
where Government
is the creditor-individuals
the Debtors.
9.
Examples of Judicatories
thus denominated.
1. General AUdit Beard.
2. Auditor of Greenwich
Hospital.
3. Chelsea Hosptial.
10.
In penal suits under
Rome-bred-law,
the Judicature carried
on even a very extensive
part of the
field. Witness Austria
and Prussia.
11.
In English practice,
double capacity of
Judge Advocate.
12.
No good reason of
signable for departure
from general practice
in these excepted
Judicatories.<pb/>
13.
Demand for securities
for appropriate aptitude
not less, but on the contrary
greater than in
ordinary causes.<pb/>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 19:05, 3 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

1827. Nov2. Constitutional Code. 1. Art.5. Chief difference between this and ordinary Judicatories in the natural degree of natural promptitude: and in Judge's situation. 2. In these cases, time for calling in the ordinary Judge can not be waited for, besides that the ordinary Judge might have less cognitional aptitude. 3. Security from maximization of facility of Appeal. 4. Art.7. Two other excepted judicatories styled in English practice Audit Court and Court of claims. 5. Characteristic difference from ordinary Judicatories, common to both, the event of a party. 6. In Audit Courts, no pursuer. in Courts of Claim no Defendant. Judicature performed in Audit Courts the calling debtors to account: the question being whether an admitted debt has been discharged or not.
---page break---

7. In ordinary debt causes, claims on this ground carried on promiscuously, with others. In this case, suits on this ground alone. 8. In English practice, the only instance in which Courts of this kind established, that where Government is the creditor-individuals the Debtors. 9. Examples of Judicatories thus denominated. 1. General AUdit Beard. 2. Auditor of Greenwich Hospital. 3. Chelsea Hosptial. 10. In penal suits under Rome-bred-law, the Judicature carried on even a very extensive part of the field. Witness Austria and Prussia. 11. In English practice, double capacity of Judge Advocate. 12. No good reason of signable for departure from general practice in these excepted Judicatories.
---page break---
13. Demand for securities for appropriate aptitude not less, but on the contrary greater than in ordinary causes.
---page break---




Identifier: | JB/042/145/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1827-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-13

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

145

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

13068

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in