★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1823. August 31<lb/><del>Constitutional Code</del> <!-- in pencil --> On Penitentiary For Place</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>(7 <note>Useless or too expensive</note></p> <p>If they had but <sic><unclear>encrease</unclear></sic> with <add>of</add> what interest they could have<lb/>Simple <unclear>ever</unclear> to object to those whose <gap/> they <gap/> of<lb/>for being put to shame by the <gap/> proper conduct.</p> <p>As to the perplexity in question either its extent is such<lb/>as Gentlemen's suppose it to be, or it is not. If not the men<lb/>employed by them to combat it could be imperfectly extent; if yes they would be unavailing.</p> <p>In comparison of those who are consigned to punishment<lb/>in this shape by <gap/> of depredation the number of those who<lb/>are consigned by <gap/> costs of all other description, put<lb/>together <unclear>as</unclear> of <add>as willing</add> no account. But liken the propensity in <add>eventual physical appetite</add><lb/>question and the considerable appetite for the makers of <gap/><lb/>or <del>the</del> indigence <add>by</add> which <add>it is</add> sharpens it where is the imaginable<lb/>connection? Why should it be stronger is the thousand, those <add>kept</add> situated<lb/><add>in confinement</add> than in the millions of individuals in the <unclear>low</unclear> pecuniary<lb/>circumstances who <del>are</del> <unclear>assure</unclear> all the the pain put in to take from<lb/>them <gap/> must be still be <gap/> to be at <gap/>?</p> <p>For the vain hope of diminishing impunity in the</p> <p><del><gap/> the <gap/></del> <gap/> Take the <gap/> this double code — happen then<lb/>all left <add><gap/></add> <gap/> do they suppose they would all practice it? If so<lb/>what does the <gap/> <gap/> now when <unclear>predicted</unclear> of it?</p> <p>Well then to what lesser number do they suppose that <gap/><lb/>different <add></add> better means of privation over those which the Panopticon<lb/>principle of <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <gap/> the practice would be confined.<lb/>Shall we say <del><gap/> <gap/></del> a <unclear>hundred <gap/> behind<lb/>those hundred</unclear>.</p> <p>Well but which then <gap/> is <del><gap/></del> in <gap/> <add> | <head>1823. August 31<lb/><del>Constitutional Code</del> <!-- in pencil --> On Penitentiary For Place</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>(7 <note>Useless or too expensive</note></p> <p>If they had but <sic><unclear>encrease</unclear></sic> with <add>of</add> what interest they could have<lb/>Simple <unclear>ever</unclear> to object to those whose <gap/> they <gap/> of<lb/>for being put to shame by the <gap/> proper conduct.</p> <p>As to the perplexity in question either its extent is such<lb/>as Gentlemen's suppose it to be, or it is not. If not the men<lb/>employed by them to combat it could be imperfectly extent; if yes they would be unavailing.</p> <p>In comparison of those who are consigned to punishment<lb/>in this shape by <gap/> of depredation the number of those who<lb/>are consigned by <gap/> costs of all other description, put<lb/>together <unclear>as</unclear> of <add>as willing</add> no account. But liken the propensity in <add>eventual physical appetite</add><lb/>question and the considerable appetite for the makers of <gap/><lb/>or <del>the</del> indigence <add>by</add> which <add>it is</add> sharpens it where is the imaginable<lb/>connection? Why should it be stronger is the thousand, those <add>kept</add> situated<lb/><add>in confinement</add> than in the millions of individuals in the <unclear>low</unclear> pecuniary<lb/>circumstances who <del>are</del> <unclear>assure</unclear> all the the pain put in to take from<lb/>them <gap/> must be still be <gap/> to be at <gap/>?</p> <p>For the vain hope of diminishing impunity in the</p> <p><del><gap/> the <gap/></del> <gap/> Take the <gap/> this double code — happen then<lb/>all left <add><gap/></add> <gap/> do they suppose they would all practice it? If so<lb/>what does the <gap/> <gap/> now when <unclear>predicted</unclear> of it?</p> <p>Well then to what lesser number do they suppose that <gap/><lb/>different <add></add> better means of privation over those which the Panopticon<lb/>principle of <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <gap/> the practice would be confined.<lb/>Shall we say <del><gap/> <gap/></del> a <unclear>hundred <gap/> behind<lb/>those hundred</unclear>.</p> <p>Well but which then <gap/> is <del><gap/></del> in <gap/> <add>as</add> the<lb/> <add>to any</add> other prison without the benefit of any such means of <del>exclu</del><lb/>seclusion the same preparation is left <gap/>. In these <gap/><lb/>the Panopticon principle with its <gap/> <gap/> ready has no<lb/>place. Had he <gap/> <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> the thing they call <gap/> early<lb/><gap/> all efficacy as nothing. Then the while they are<lb/>lessening it <add>the <gap/></add> upon a smaller scale by one <del><gap/></del> <gap/> measure<lb/>be it upon a much larger scale.</p> <p>To one such when in a principle to turn a <gap/> to tell <gap/><lb/>the most <add><gap/></add> <gap/> and <gap/> arguments in <gap/> no more <gap/> than the <unclear>valuers</unclear></p> <p><note>This <gap/> will<lb/><gap/> the religion<lb/>then will <sic>shew</sic> <gap/><lb/>adoring it is to good<lb/>purpose of out and<lb/>intelligible good.</note></p> | ||
1823. August 31
Constitutional Code On Penitentiary For Place
(7 Useless or too expensive
If they had but encrease with of what interest they could have
Simple ever to object to those whose they of
for being put to shame by the proper conduct.
As to the perplexity in question either its extent is such
as Gentlemen's suppose it to be, or it is not. If not the men
employed by them to combat it could be imperfectly extent; if yes they would be unavailing.
In comparison of those who are consigned to punishment
in this shape by of depredation the number of those who
are consigned by costs of all other description, put
together as of as willing no account. But liken the propensity in eventual physical appetite
question and the considerable appetite for the makers of
or the indigence by which it is sharpens it where is the imaginable
connection? Why should it be stronger is the thousand, those kept situated
in confinement than in the millions of individuals in the low pecuniary
circumstances who are assure all the the pain put in to take from
them must be still be to be at ?
For the vain hope of diminishing impunity in the
the Take the this double code — happen then
all left do they suppose they would all practice it? If so
what does the now when predicted of it?
Well then to what lesser number do they suppose that
different better means of privation over those which the Panopticon
principle of the practice would be confined.
Shall we say a hundred behind
those hundred.
Well but which then is in as the
to any other prison without the benefit of any such means of exclu
seclusion the same preparation is left . In these
the Panopticon principle with its ready has no
place. Had he the thing they call early
all efficacy as nothing. Then the while they are
lessening it the upon a smaller scale by one measure
be it upon a much larger scale.
To one such when in a principle to turn a to tell
the most and arguments in no more than the valuers
This will
the religion
then will shew
adoring it is to good
purpose of out and
intelligible good.
|
Identifier: | JB/115/152/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 115. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1823-08-31 |
|||
|
115 |
panopticon |
||
|
152 |
on penitentiary for place |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1822 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1822 |
|||
|
37527 |
|||
