JB/042/147/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/147/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
G.B. 1827. Novr. 20 copied. 1826. March 12


Constitutional Code.
1.
Logical field of Service
nearly what in
French denominated
competence.
2.
But signification of
logical field of service
more ample, since it
comprises both person
who and things which
are subject matters of
operation.
3.
Judicatory field omnicomprehensive
and territory.
Reasons.
1. No one Judicatory
of which the Judge, in
giving effect to a just
demand, may not find
it necessary to give
effect to it in the territory
of any other judicatory.
4.
Ends of justice, contravened
by division
of the logical field
of service between
Judicatory and Judicatory.
5.
Sale argument in
favour of a logical
division is derived
from the immoralityuniversality
of the practice.
6.
Existing system a
labyrinth in which
the mind is bewildered.
7.
Omnicompetence
necessary.
II.5
Of the opposite exclusionary
justificative
cause, none.
8.
Efficient cause, prim&aelig;val
barbarism.
9.
Evil effects.
1. Expense.
By the second independent
expense doubled.
10.
2. Uncertainty and
uncognoscibility.
In every different
sort of Judicatory,
ways for coming at
the truth different
yet most apt way
there can not be more
than me.
Underr every existing
system all may be,
no more than one
can be, comparatively
apt.
Under the existing
system, aberrations
multitudinous and
various.
For each of them, to
him by whom the existence
of a justificative
cause is alledged,
it belongs to exhibit it.
11.
Judicial division
of the territory into
districts and subdistricts.
12.
Divers immediate
Judicatories may be
in one subdistrict.
13.
Or divers subdistricts
under one Immediate
Judicatory.
14.
In Election DIstricts
and subdistricts,
population the leading
consideration.
XII. Judiciary Collectively.
S.6. Fields of Service.
Principle 1. Principle
of Judicial omnicompetence.
Rule. By the logical
Judicial <add>field of service of each Judicatory</add> field all-comprehensive.
Principle 2. Principle of
judicialubiquity.
Rule. Be the local
Judicial field of service
of each Judiciary all
comprehensive.
&#x2014;
S<gap/>] 1. Expositive. 1.2.
S<gap/>S 2. Omnicompetence
7.8.9.10..6.4.5.
S2S3. Ubiquity. 3.




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:44, 10 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

G.B. 1827. Novr. 20 copied. 1826. March 12

Constitutional Code. 1. Logical field of Service nearly what in French denominated competence. 2. But signification of logical field of service more ample, since it comprises both person who and things which are subject matters of operation. 3. Judicatory field omnicomprehensive and territory. Reasons. 1. No one Judicatory of which the Judge, in giving effect to a just demand, may not find it necessary to give effect to it in the territory of any other judicatory. 4. Ends of justice, contravened by division of the logical field of service between Judicatory and Judicatory. 5. Sale argument in favour of a logical division is derived from the immoralityuniversality of the practice.

6. Existing system a labyrinth in which the mind is bewildered. 7. Omnicompetence necessary. II.5 Of the opposite exclusionary justificative cause, none. 8. Efficient cause, primæval barbarism. 9. Evil effects. 1. Expense. By the second independent expense doubled. 10. 2. Uncertainty and uncognoscibility. In every different sort of Judicatory, ways for coming at the truth different yet most apt way there can not be more than me. Underr every existing system all may be, no more than one can be, comparatively apt. Under the existing system, aberrations multitudinous and various. For each of them, to him by whom the existence of a justificative cause is alledged, it belongs to exhibit it.

11. Judicial division of the territory into districts and subdistricts. 12. Divers immediate Judicatories may be in one subdistrict. 13. Or divers subdistricts under one Immediate Judicatory. 14. In Election DIstricts and subdistricts, population the leading consideration.

XII. Judiciary Collectively. S.6. Fields of Service.

Principle 1. Principle of Judicial omnicompetence. Rule. By the logical Judicial field of service of each Judicatory field all-comprehensive. Principle 2. Principle of judicialubiquity. Rule. Be the local Judicial field of service of each Judiciary all comprehensive. — S] 1. Expositive. 1.2. SS 2. Omnicompetence 7.8.9.10..6.4.5. S2S3. Ubiquity. 3.



Identifier: | JB/042/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-03-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-14

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

147

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13070

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in