JB/052/287/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/287/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/052/287/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
(No difference)

Revision as of 18:20, 15 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

1825. Jany. 24
Procedure Code

+
ChVI Judicial Application
(8§.4. Purposes<note>

<note>15
Art. 15.V. Prospective evidence
securing: as to
saving from being lost,
for want of judicially receivable
evidence a right
is a means of repressing
wrong: personal, by <del</del
death, physical inability
or local transfer; written
and real, by obstruction
mislaying or local transfer Evidence which after suit commenced
should be forthcoming
so should before
reason, the same. Suit
may then in many<lb/cases be preventative.
In non penal the need
is more frequent than
in non- cases:
but the supply if in
the one case
to the ends of justice, so
in the other.

Art.15. V Purpose Prospective evidence securing. To
here the saving a right as a means for the repression
of A wrong to be from being lost for want of appropriate and highly judicially
receivable evidence, evidence is liable to be lost
by death physical mobility or local transfer of the person
from whom it should have come; written and other real<lb?>evidence by destruction mislaying or local transfer. Thereafter commencement
of a suit grounded on it, evidence should be
made forthcoming so should it before: such : reason
in both cases the same By securing it before suit, it
may
suit may in many cases be prevented In non-penal cases
the need of such evidence is secure
but as to the supply, if in any case conducive to the ends of
justice in consequence so it is in every other.

16
Art. 16. Personal source
of the evidence, either
the applicant, or some<lb>one else. If the applicant,
the applicant
is a Prospective Evidence
Officer the demand being
that it be reason <lb>from him and recorded:
if , a Prospective
Evidence- demandant:
demand that it be
from where
so ever obtainable.

Art. 16. The person from whom the evidence for the purpose
is needed may be the applicant or any other
person. In the first case the all that what is demanded to then
the evidence which the applicant is ready to utter deliver be
received and recorded: to this is added or substituted in the other case to this demand
is added or substituted
is the demand that, as
in the case in consequence in which already in existence
the in an already existing suit an appropriate order be delivered <del.to him
from which it should by which it should be delivered ordering him by whom when, where
and how it the is to be delivered. In applicant in the first case, the applicant
Evidence offering applicant: a prospective evidence offered: in the other, new
Prospective evidence requiring applicant demandant.

17
In both cases,
against abuse prosecutions
will be necessary:
for this see Ch.
Prospective evidence
how obtainable.

In both cases, the precautionary arrangements<lb/are needed for the prevention of abuse: for these see
Ch. Prospective evidence, how obtainable.



Identifier: | JB/052/287/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1825-01-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-16

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

287

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

16960

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in