JB/042/152/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/152/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1831. July 26
Const.Code.
1.
Ends in view of judicature,
not grastification
of Judge's pride.
 
2.
Intercommunity maximized -
why.
 
3.
Original Judge he to
whom the initiatory
application is made,
to no other to the same
effect application having
been made by
same applicant. In
Procedure Code, given
to every other Judge is
power of invading his
territory.
 
4.
Initiatory application
what.
 
2 (a).
Judicial application
1. Petitory or
2. Simply informative
 
4.
Cases in, purposes for
which, acts for which,
juridicial invasion
may be needful.
 
5
For operations needful
see Procedure Code.
 
6.
To invaded, notice
will be given by
invading Judge.
 
7.
Power to originating
Judge to recommend
transfer of the suit
to the proper Judicatory.
 
8
Judge will retain or
dismiss according to the
ends of justice. For
responsibility of applicant
for dismissal
see Procedure Code.
 
9.
Invading Judge takes
with him his rank
and power.
 
10.
Execution of both or
orders impossible, prevalent
is the order
first begun to be
executed.
 
11
Examples of such
incompatability
1. Subject matter of the
orders a person.
2. Subject matter of the
orders a thing.
 
12.
 
13.
Jurisdiction adjusting
function belongs to Appellate
Judge of the Immediate
Indicatories are
in the same Appellate
jurisdiction District:
if not to Justice Minister.
 
14.
Answer Aware will be
the Superordinate of
collusion between the
Subordinates.
 
15.
Provisional these arrangements:
for definition,
adjustment, &amp;c.
See Ch. Procedure
Code.
 
16.
Such intercommunity why?
Answer - No one judicatory
of which the
Judge in giving effect
to a just demand may
not find it necessary
to give effect to it in
the territory of any
other Judicatory.
 
17.
Question 1. Consistently
with other this intercommunity
how can
any suit belg
belong to anyone Indicatory
more than to
another?
 
2.
Answer -
1. To the Judicatory in
which the first hearing
has place belongs
the suit or other application.
Call that the
original or say originating
Judicatory.
3.
Ordinarily, in the
originating Judicatory
will be carried on
all proceedings from
first to last: of the
Judge of no other
Judicatory will the
power have need to be
applied.
 
Ch XII Judicatory Collectly
&sect;7. Intercommunity of
Service.
 
 
 
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:12, 16 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

1831. July 26 Const.Code. 1. Ends in view of judicature, not grastification of Judge's pride.

2. Intercommunity maximized - why.

3. Original Judge he to whom the initiatory application is made, to no other to the same effect application having been made by same applicant. In Procedure Code, given to every other Judge is power of invading his territory.

4. Initiatory application what.

2 (a). Judicial application 1. Petitory or 2. Simply informative

4. Cases in, purposes for which, acts for which, juridicial invasion may be needful.

5 For operations needful see Procedure Code.

6. To invaded, notice will be given by invading Judge.

7. Power to originating Judge to recommend transfer of the suit to the proper Judicatory.

8 Judge will retain or dismiss according to the ends of justice. For responsibility of applicant for dismissal see Procedure Code.

9. Invading Judge takes with him his rank and power.

10. Execution of both or orders impossible, prevalent is the order first begun to be executed.

11 Examples of such incompatability 1. Subject matter of the orders a person. 2. Subject matter of the orders a thing.

12.

13. Jurisdiction adjusting function belongs to Appellate Judge of the Immediate Indicatories are in the same Appellate jurisdiction District: if not to Justice Minister.

14. Answer Aware will be the Superordinate of collusion between the Subordinates.

15. Provisional these arrangements: for definition, adjustment, &c. See Ch. Procedure Code.

16. Such intercommunity why? Answer - No one judicatory of which the Judge in giving effect to a just demand may not find it necessary to give effect to it in the territory of any other Judicatory.

17. Question 1. Consistently with other this intercommunity how can any suit belg belong to anyone Indicatory more than to another?

2. Answer - 1. To the Judicatory in which the first hearing has place belongs the suit or other application. Call that the original or say originating Judicatory. 3. Ordinarily, in the originating Judicatory will be carried on all proceedings from first to last: of the Judge of no other Judicatory will the power have need to be applied.

Ch XII Judicatory Collectly §7. Intercommunity of Service.







Identifier: | JB/042/152/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1831-07-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4, 2a, 4-17, 1-3

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

152

Info in main headings field

const. code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

13075

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in