JB/081/100/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:36, 19 August 2021

1829 March 23 Petition
(7
Supplement
§.3 Suits in prudences

Prevention of disappointment - The fo more closely
the matter is considered, the more satisfactory will be a
man's , that by those . short
as it is, is excluded the only justifiable reason why
to over in relation to the matter of wealth and the other
objects of the general that which is reported as
each mans own should be secured to him, instead of rather than
being given to any this or that other man, or left to
be taken by any man so inclined.

Well then this is the object of all the several arguments
made for the security of property this is the
end in view: in all these cases instances it is the object –how
so can indirectly and fortuously – though can or may
and

Identifier: \| JB/081/100/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-03-23	Marginal Summary Numbering	11-15
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	100	Info in main headings field	petitions
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d7 / e7
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	street & co
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer	antonio alcala galiano
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25887
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/081/100/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p><head>1829 March 23
+Petition</head><lb/>
+(7<lb/>
+<note>Supplement<lb/>
+&sect;.3 Suits in prudences</note></p>
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<p>Prevention of disappointment - The <del>fo</del> more closely<lb/>
-March 23
+the matter is considered, the more satisfactory will be a<lb/>
+man's <gap/>, that by those .<del><gap/> <gap/></del> <gap/> short<lb/>
+as it is, is <del><gap/></del> excluded the only justifiable reason why<lb/>
+<del>to over</del> in relation to the matter of wealth
+and the other<lb/>
+objects of <del>the</del> general <gap/> that which is <unclear>reported</unclear> as<lb/>
+each mans <hi rend="underline">own</hi> should be secured to him, instead of <add>rather than</add><lb/>
+being given to <del>any</del> this or that other man, or left to<lb/>
+be taken by any man so inclined.</p>
-Petition
+Well then <del>this is the object</del> of all the several arguments<lb/>
+made for the security of property this is the<lb/>
-Prevention of disappointment this the only justification of decision in civil cases.
+end in view:  in all these cases <add>instances</add> it is the object –how<lb/>
+so can indirectly and <unclear>fortuously</unclear> – though can or may <gap/><lb/>
+and
-This the object of all arrangements for the security of property.
-. This beign admitted why not in each isntance give the Judge a direct power of giving such decisions.
-. No evil to the apprehended so great as [u/under] existing system]]]]
-Prevention of disappoitnment - The former closely the matter is considered, the more satisfactory will be a means considered, that by those ... as it is, is excluded the only justification reason why ... in relation tot he matter of wealth
-and the other objects of ... governed ... that which is reponded as each means [u/in] should be secured has been .... being given to this in that other men, or left to be taken by any men so inclined. Will then ... of all the proposed? arguments made for the security of property these is the ... it is the object, how so ...
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Views

JB/081/100/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:36, 19 August 2021

Navigation

Search