★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
m Protected "JB/078/036/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
||
(No difference)
|
1826. Octr. +
Review of Humphreys
Mortgage
Pledged and London
Borrower and London
Land Pawner
By an I have
not immoveable syndicate
No 2. Mortgage
1
Particulars in which
Mortgage differs from Sale
1. In Sale transfer can
med in martgage,
eventual: event, more
payment of many
To what parties This second mode of disposition - in
what particulars is it different from the firm firstmentioned one-
sale? Answer. In the following. In the case of sale, the transfer
was is absolute and immediate: in the case of mortgage future
contingent: event on which contingent, non repayment of
money lent:- lent by mortgagee (eventual parition)
to mortgagees - the eventual .| erably unexpressive
this pair of denominations but being so thoroughly rooted in
law language, they mean to the torment of lay quits and lyros, they can
not but be continued. Land parties pledges and Land favourspledges
Lder would be terrific; but would be the less expressive. Land
pledger's favours Lands which every body would understand has not
now so many words in it as casting give trust which nobody
understand and nobodyno but a learned gentleman pretender is faciens pretends himself
to understand.
2.
Inpression, mortgage
Land pledge better
Preference to que
When, to scarce pair repr payment of interest, and
thereafter repayment of principal, land as they put in
the common objec there are three ways in any one of which
the common object is capable of being effected: three different
conditions in respect of possession: three different sorts of persons
in whose the possession of any one of whom the subject matter might
be the Land pawner to say if less shocking the Land
pledges. the Landpawners Land-pledgers Lender, and sum or third
person agreed upon by both in the to official character of trustees. Where
confidence suffices, the ford mentioned of these diversification is manifestly
both considered the most eligible of the three: the subject matter party in
whose possession the subject matter is continued is the one whose interest
in the preservation of it is by far the greatest: to the proprietor
the mortification of having the apparent d is spared
3
Footing on which
money might be borrowed
on loan - a
Trustee to hold for
borrower and lender
By an I not inexcusable Note is synted syntion, I say Land-pawner
the only proper in being the only adequately comprehensive denomination
Immoveable parties would move more indignation than I can find were to endure.
Frank
View of Frank pledge is
already in law language
Identifier: | JB/078/036/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-10-07 |
1-3 |
||
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
036 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
001 |
No 2 Mortgage |
||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
C13 / C1 / E1 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1826 |
|||
25127 |
|||