★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>1826. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 12<lb/> | ||
J. B. v. Sugden<lb/> | |||
1</head> | |||
<note>Per S. simplifications<lb/> | |||
<unclear>co<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></unclear> be evaded.</note> | |||
<p>p. 23 "The proposed rule is opposed to the habits and<lb/> | |||
genius of the nation, and would if enacted be immediately<lb/> | |||
evaded."</p> | |||
<p>Suited to the habits of the nation indeed!<lb/> | |||
say rather to the habits of the conveyancers. <del>And</del> What<lb/> | |||
does the nations know about conveyancers? What<lb/> | |||
part of the nation draws it's own conveyances? And<lb/> | |||
whence came the habits of conveyancers? But <gap/><lb/> | |||
he interests the sinister interests of those conveyancers?<lb/> | |||
And these same conveyancers who are they? Either<lb/> | |||
practising Barristers or Attornies, or men united to<lb/> | |||
both tribes by a community of sinister interest.</p> | |||
<p>They would be evaded, would they?<lb/> | |||
A good round assertion this: and the assertion does<lb/> | |||
he or does he not believe it to be true? If not then<lb/> | |||
what are we to think of </p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1826. Decr 12
J. B. v. Sugden
1
Per S. simplifications
cod be evaded.
p. 23 "The proposed rule is opposed to the habits and
genius of the nation, and would if enacted be immediately
evaded."
Suited to the habits of the nation indeed!
say rather to the habits of the conveyancers. And What
does the nations know about conveyancers? What
part of the nation draws it's own conveyances? And
whence came the habits of conveyancers? But
he interests the sinister interests of those conveyancers?
And these same conveyancers who are they? Either
practising Barristers or Attornies, or men united to
both tribes by a community of sinister interest.
They would be evaded, would they?
A good round assertion this: and the assertion does
he or does he not believe it to be true? If not then
what are we to think of
|
Identifier: | JB/078/214/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-12-12 |
|||
|
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
214 |
JB v. Sugden |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
C1 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
25305 |
|||
