JB/159/182/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:26, 25 August 2021

Disablement. Evils

to our conceptions than have single unconnected ideas: they do not
serve to express propositions. Let a serpent They do not
for example be supposed to be the mark of prudence express the difference between affirmation and negation:
between certainty and contingency: between
present past and future. Let the figure of a serpent be
for instance be the mark of prudence: and to
shew that it has relation to a man: and let it
be placed close to the figure of a man: and let it
be supposed that there is no difficulty in making
out who is the man designed in question. Still there
is nothing to express whether he is prudent or the meaning is to assert that the quality of prudence
not is to be understood does or that it does not
belong to him; whether that it belongs to him for a certainty
or whether it only may belong to him in such
an event; whether that, it belonged to him yesterday,
belongs to him to day or will belong to
him tomorrow

The finger long ago that is in use is when

Finger language

There is a way method of talking with the fingers, which
I imagine is every where pretty nearly the same.
Each of the twenty four letters has a correspondent
sign expressed by some attitude of one
or both of the hands. This is calculated originally
for such as have their sight: but it might be the fingers hands
made use of being the hands of him who represents

Identifier: \| JB/159/182/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	159	Main Headings	punishment
Folio number	182	Info in main headings field	disablement evils
Image	001	Titles	finger language
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d9 / d10 / d11 / d12
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	caroline vernon
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	54005
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/159/182/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>Disablement. Evils</head>
+<p><head>Disablement.  Evils</head></p>
-<p>to our conceptions than <del><gap/></del> <add>single unconnected</add> ideas: they do not<lb/>serve to express propositions. <del>Let a serpent</del> <add>They do not</add><lb/><del>for example be supposed to be the mark of <unclear>semblance</unclear></del> <add>express the difference between <unclear>affirmation</unclear> and negation:</add><lb/>between <unclear>certainty</unclear> and contingency: between<lb/>present past and future. Let <add>the figure of</add> a serpent <del>be</del><lb/>for instance be the mark of prudence: and to<lb/>shew that it has relation to a man: and let it<lb/>be supposed that there is no difficulty in making<lb/>out who is the man <add><unclear>designed</unclear></add> in question. Still there<lb/>is nothing to express whether <del>he is prudent or</del> <add>the <gap/> is to assert that the quality of prudence</add><lb/><del><gap/> is to be <gap/></del> does or that it does not<lb/>belong to him; whether <add>that</add> it belongs to him for a certainty<lb/>or <del><gap/></del> only may belong to him in such<lb/>an event; <del>whether</del> that, it belonged to him yesterday,<lb/>belongs to him to day or will belong to<lb/>him tomorrow</p>
+<p>to our conceptions than <del>have</del> <add>single unconnected</add> ideas:  they do not<lb/>
-<p><del>The finger language that is in use is <gap/></del></p>
+serve to express propositions.  <del>Let a serpent</del> <add>They do not</add><lb/>
+<del>for example be supposed to be the mark of prudence</del> <add>express the difference between affirmation and negation:</add><lb/>
+between certainty and contingency:  between<lb/>
+present past and future.  Let <add>the figure of</add> a serpent <del>be</del><lb/>
+for instance be the mark of prudence: and to<lb/>
+shew that it has relation to a man:  and let it<lb/>
+be placed <add>close</add> to the figure of a man:  and let it<lb/>
+be supposed that there is no difficulty in making<lb/>
+out who is the man <add>designed</add> in question.  Still there<lb/>
+is nothing to express whether <del>he is prudent or</del> <add>the meaning is to assert that the quality of prudence</add><lb/>
+<del>not is to be understood</del> does or that it does not<lb/>
+belong to him;  <del>whether</del> <add>that</add> it belongs to him for a certainty<lb/>
+or <del>whether it</del> only may belong to him in such<lb/>
+an event;  <del>whether</del> that, it belonged to him yesterday,<lb/>
+belongs to him to day or will belong to<lb/>
+him tomorrow</p>
+<p><del>The finger long ago that is in use is when</del></p>
 <note>Finger language</note>
-<p>There is a <del>way</del> <add>method</add> of talking with the fingers, which<lb/>I imagine is every where pretty nearly the same.<lb/>Each of the twenty four letters has a correspondent<lb/>sign expressed by some attitude of one<lb/>or both of the hands. This is calculated originally<lb/>for such as have their sight: <del>but it might be</del> <add>the <del>fingers</del> hands</add><lb/>made use of being the hands of him <unclear>also</unclear> represents</p>
+<p>There is a <del>way</del> <add>method</add> of talking with the fingers, which<lb/>
+I imagine is every where pretty nearly the same.<lb/>
+Each of the twenty four letters has a correspondent<lb/>
+sign expressed by some attitude of one<lb/>
+or both of the hands. This is calculated originally<lb/>
+for such as have their sight:  <del>but it might be</del> <add>the <del>fingers</del> hands</add><lb/>
+made use of being the hands of him who represents</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/159/182/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:26, 25 August 2021

Navigation

Search