JB/159/062/001

Click Here To Edit

March 1811
Punishment

Thus then the practical use of the distinction is –
or warning memento in the case where eventual forthcomingness
is the object and the only ultimate object of the
arrangement – in the first f place not to employ safe-custody
in any instance in which an inflictive attended
with less suffering would be adequate to the purpose,
in the next place where nothing less short of safe-custody
will it is supposed be sufficient thus adequate, to clear it keep this necessary infliction of all as such other inflictions
as howsoever necessary or meet to the purpose
of punishment, are may unnecessary to the purpose of
safe-custody unnecessary.

Note (a)
(a) Thus By keeping the individual [to defence] Thus, by employing for the safe-custody of the individual
in that sort of building which places him in a state of constant inspection, or rather in a constant
capacity of being ultimately inspected, the exemption might
be afforded him from the more afflictive inflictions, chaining for example, to
which it may otherwise be necessary that he should
be subjected.

Identifier: | JB/159/062/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.
Date_1	1811-03-04	Marginal Summary Numbering	56 or 4, 56a or 4a
Box	159	Main Headings	punishment
Folio number	062	Info in main headings field	punishment
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d26 / e26
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	53885
Box Contents