JB/052/320/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/320/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1826 <sic>Aug</sic> 23<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>f 8<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> <hi rend="superscript">I</hi> Proxies</note></p> <p>But <gap/> could not have applied<lb/>especially in those where education had not <gap/> <gap/> upon Judges</p> <p>In this case it may indeed be said in these cases as in<lb/>others merit could find its way, in the case of this as well as other<lb/>arts the degree of proficiency on the part of each man would be<lb/>evidenced by his conduct.  True to some it would but to others<lb/>it would not: those to whom it would be evidenced would with<lb/>little addition be better educated inhabitants of the <gap/>: <del><gap/></del><lb/>that town alone in which the Judicatory has its seat: <del>those <lb/>to whom</del> the rest of the inhabitants would on each occasion<lb/>be at a loss to whom to entrust their respective interests, and<lb/>would be liable to be <gap/> possessor as if it w<gap/> by the<lb/>boldest and most <gap/> <gap/>.</p> <p>2. The function of <del>pract</del> Law practitioners, or say<lb/>Litigants Proxy is but one of the functions nor that the most<lb/>important one, for which the <del>d</del> service capable of being rendered<lb/>by <del>us</del> the class of men in justice are needed.  besides this<lb/>case in which it is only to individuals <add>individually taken</add> that the service is rendered,<lb/>there are two official situations <add>or <gap/> <gap/></add> in which the need<lb/>applies. 1. that of Judicial <gap/> for it the there first of the<lb/>four Probate years: 2. that same situation, alternating with<lb/>that Advocate of the  <add><gap/> <gap/></add> <gap/>.  True it is that in <add>first of</add> <gap/> of<lb/>those character <del>will be</del> they will not serve any otherwise than occasions<lb/> where <add>waiting</add> the company with the requisite clients, waiting<lb/>to be heard, <add>but</add> equally true it is that but for the <del>lively hood</del> <add>preference</add> expected<lb/>to be obtained after this long time of study and probation,<lb/>scarce any <add>one</add> of them would be found to subject himself to it.</p>  
<head>1826 <sic>Aug</sic> 23<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>f 8<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> <hi rend="superscript">I</hi> Proxies</note></p> <p>But <gap/> could not have applied<lb/>especially in those where education had not <gap/> <gap/> upon Judges</p> <p>In this case it may indeed be said in this case as in<lb/>others merit could find its way, in the case of this as well as other<lb/>arts the degree of proficiency on the part of each man would be<lb/>evidenced by his conduct.  True to some it would: but to others<lb/>it would not: those to whom it would be evidenced would with<lb/>little addition be better educated inhabitants of the town: <del><gap/></del><lb/>that town alone in which the Judicatory had its seat: <del>those <lb/>to whom</del> the rest of the inhabitants would on each occasion<lb/>be at a loss to whom to entrust their respective interests, and<lb/>would be liable to be <unclear>taken possession</unclear> of as if it <sic>where</sic> by the<lb/>boldest and most artful intruder.</p> <p>2. The function of <del>pract</del> Law practitioners, or say<lb/>Litigants Proxy is but one of two functions &#x2014; nor that the most<lb/>important one, for which the <del>d</del> service capable of being rendered<lb/>by <del>us</del> the class of men in justice are needed.  Besides this<lb/>case in which it is only to individuals <add>individually taken</add> that the service is rendered,<lb/>there are two official <add>or <foreign>quasi</foreign> official</add> situations in which the need<lb/>applies. 1. that of <unclear>Judicious</unclear> <gap/> for <del>it</del> the three first of the<lb/>four Probation years: 2. that same situation, alternating with<lb/>that Advocate of the  <add><foreign><unclear>pro ini</unclear></foreign></add> <gap/>.  True it is that in neither of <add>first of</add><lb/>those <del>character will the</del> they will not serve any otherwise than occasions<lb/> where <add>waiting</add> in company with their respective clients, waiting to<lb/>be heard, <add>but</add> equally true it is that but for the <del>lively hood</del> <add>preference</add> expected<lb/>to be obtained after this long time of study and probation,<lb/>scarce any <add>one</add> of them would be found to subject himself to it.</p> <!-- marginal note in pencil --> <p><del>Need of security<lb/><gap/> <gap/><lb/>of the lawyer<lb/>liability to be sued<lb/>by one for reason<lb/>of double the money</del></note></p>





Revision as of 13:26, 31 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

1826 Aug 23
Procedure Code

f 8
Ch. I Proxies

But could not have applied
especially in those where education had not upon Judges

In this case it may indeed be said in this case as in
others merit could find its way, in the case of this as well as other
arts the degree of proficiency on the part of each man would be
evidenced by his conduct. True to some it would: but to others
it would not: those to whom it would be evidenced would with
little addition be better educated inhabitants of the town:
that town alone in which the Judicatory had its seat: those
to whom
the rest of the inhabitants would on each occasion
be at a loss to whom to entrust their respective interests, and
would be liable to be taken possession of as if it where by the
boldest and most artful intruder.

2. The function of pract Law practitioners, or say
Litigants Proxy is but one of two functions — nor that the most
important one, for which the d service capable of being rendered
by us the class of men in justice are needed. Besides this
case in which it is only to individuals individually taken that the service is rendered,
there are two official or quasi official situations in which the need
applies. 1. that of Judicious for it the three first of the
four Probation years: 2. that same situation, alternating with
that Advocate of the pro ini . True it is that in neither of first of
those character will the they will not serve any otherwise than occasions
where waiting in company with their respective clients, waiting to
be heard, but equally true it is that but for the lively hood preference expected
to be obtained after this long time of study and probation,
scarce any one of them would be found to subject himself to it.

Need of security

of the lawyer
liability to be sued
by one for reason
of double the money
</note>




Identifier: | JB/052/320/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1826-08-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

320

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

16993

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in