JB/159/193/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/159/193/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/159/193/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/193/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/193/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Imprisonment examined <add>judged of</add></head></p>
 
<p>Of the inconveniences of <del>Simple</del> Imprisonment<lb/>
 
none are convertible to Profit.</p>
 
<p>On the <del>part</del> <add>score</add> of<lb/>
Frugality [on the part of the state] the whole punishment<lb/>
is exceptionable on account of the 8<hi rend="superscript">th</hi><lb/>
inconvenience [of Simple Imprisonment].  Such persons<lb/>
whose livelyhood depends upon their liberty, must <del>be</del><lb/>
either starve or be maintained at public cost.</p>
<p>In point of certainty, <add>Simple</add> Imprisonment <del>it</del> is objectionable<lb/>
<del>on account</del> <add>in respect</add> of the <del><gap/></del> 7<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> <del>&amp;</del> 8<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> &amp; 9<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of the inconveniences<lb/>
attached to it.</p>
<p>In point of Equability it is objectionable in respect of<lb/>
the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <add>head of</add> inconvenience.  But <del>this objection applies if</del> <add>the persons to whom this objection</add><lb/>
<del>very few persons</del> <add>is apt to apply are very few</add> and where it does apply <add>it</add> is in<lb/>
<add>comparison a</add> very slight one.</p>
<p>In respect of the 7<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> &amp; 8<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> heads of inconvenience the<lb/>
objection to it [in point of equability is] <add>on this score are</add> more serious.<lb/>
The persons <add>however</add> to whom <add>it is likely to apply in respect of</add> the 7<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> are very few:  and in<lb/>
their case it might be obviated by <del>the</del> an order of<lb/>
the Magistrate.  The inconvenience is the loss to be<lb/>
regretted in as much as the bulk of prisoners being<lb/>
always of the poorer sort, would commonly be effectually<lb/>
debarred <add>from <del>poorer</del> applying the remedies in question</add> by the natural circumstance of want of fortune,<lb/>
as by this factitious one of want of liberty.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:07, 3 September 2021

Click Here To Edit

1

Imprisonment examined judged of

Of the inconveniences of Simple Imprisonment
none are convertible to Profit.

On the part score of
Frugality [on the part of the state] the whole punishment
is exceptionable on account of the 8th
inconvenience [of Simple Imprisonment]. Such persons
whose livelyhood depends upon their liberty, must be
either starve or be maintained at public cost.

In point of certainty, Simple Imprisonment it is objectionable
on account in respect of the 7th & 8th & 9th of the inconveniences
attached to it.

In point of Equability it is objectionable in respect of
the 3d head of inconvenience. But this objection applies if the persons to whom this objection
very few persons is apt to apply are very few and where it does apply it is in
comparison a very slight one.

In respect of the 7th & 8th heads of inconvenience the
objection to it [in point of equability is] on this score are more serious.
The persons however to whom it is likely to apply in respect of the 7th are very few: and in
their case it might be obviated by the an order of
the Magistrate. The inconvenience is the loss to be
regretted in as much as the bulk of prisoners being
always of the poorer sort, would commonly be effectually
debarred from poorer applying the remedies in question by the natural circumstance of want of fortune,
as by this factitious one of want of liberty.


Identifier: | JB/159/193/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

193

Info in main headings field

imprisonment /examined / judged of/

Image

001

Titles

convertibility to profit / frugality / certainty / equability / variability / exemplarity / subserviency to reformation

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

54016

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in