JB/169/236/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/169/236/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/169/236/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/169/236/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/169/236/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<note><!-- Pencil note -->Vaughan</note>
<p><note><!-- Pencil -->Vaughan</note></p>
<p>Sir</p>
<p>Sir</p>
<p>A variety of paragraphs having appeared<lb/>
<p>A variety of paragraphs having appeared<lb/>
<del>at</del> on <add>a variety of</add> <del>various</del> occasions in the Times, <del>glancing</del><add><del>twilled</del></add><lb/>
<del>at</del> on <del>various</del> <add>a variety of</add> occasions in the Times, <del>glancing <add>twilled</add></del><lb/>
<del>out</del><add> reflecting on</add> the gentleman undermentioned, sometimes by<lb/>
<del>out</del><add> reflecting on</add> the gentleman undermentioned, sometimes by<lb/>
<del>name, at other<gap/> times</del> a <add>mode of</add> description not to be<lb/>
<del>name, at other times</del> a <add>mode of</add> description not to be<lb/>
mistaken, sometimes even by name, an attempt<lb/>
mistaken, sometimes even by name, an attempt<lb/>
was made, <add>for the purpose</add> <del>in the <gap/> view</del> of public justice, to<lb/>
was made, <del>in the vain view</del> <add>for the purpose</add> of public justice, to<lb/>
<add>indicate the proceeding in question <del>before</del> on the same <del>ground</del><add>stage</add></add> <lb/>
<del>defend answer but content</del> <add>vindicate the proceeding in question <del>before</del> on the same <del>ground</del> stage</add> at <del>the same tribunal</del><lb/>
<del>defend answer but contact</del> <del>or the same trib</del>unal<lb/>
which exhibited the charge. The answer was,<lb/>
which exhibited the charge. The answer was,<lb/>
that the <del>defence</del><add>observations</add> might be very just, but if they<lb/>
that the <del>defence</del><add>observations</add> might be very just, but if they<lb/>
were inserted, five guineas must be paid. If<lb/>
were inserted, five guineas must be paid. If<lb/>
the same <add>reserve had been maintained in regard to</add><del>condition had been answered to the</del><lb/>
the same <del>condition had been answered to the</del> <add>reserve had been maintained in regard to</add><lb/>
<del>publication of the charge as to that of</del><add>the attack as in regard to</add> the defence,<lb/>
<del>publication of the charge as to that of</del> <add>the attack as in regard to</add> the defence,<lb/>
the demand would have been less unreasonable, or<lb/>
the demand would have been less unreasonable, or<lb/>
rather the <del>resonance of</del> opportunity of making it would never<lb/>
rather the <del>resonance of</del> opportunity of making it would never<lb/>
Line 23: Line 22:
<del>to be the custom of the paper.</del></p>
<del>to be the custom of the paper.</del></p>
<p>According to this system <add><del>plan</del></add>, a newspaper, instead<lb/>
<p>According to this system <add><del>plan</del></add>, a newspaper, instead<lb/>
of being a vehicle of <add>public<add><del>comment a useful</del></add></add> intelligence, is to be an<lb/>
of being a vehicle of <add>public <del>comment a useful</del></add> intelligence, is to be an<lb/>
instrument of extortion, by  means of which individuals<lb/>
instrument of extortion, by  means of which individuals<lb/>
are to be laid under contribution, by<lb/>
are to be laid under contribution, by<lb/>
being <add>harrassed by <add>groundless</add></add><add> imputations</add><del>stigmatized by accusations</del> <add>to which</add><del>against which</del><lb/>
being del>stigmatized by accusations against which</del> <add>harrassed by groundless imputations to which</add><lb/>
<del>they are not to be permitted to defend themselves</del><lb/>
<del>they are not to be permitted to defend themselves</del><lb/>
without delivering a purse heavier than what <note>it is common for<lb/>
without delivering a purse heavier than what it is common for a highwayman to risk his neck for<lb/>
a highwayman to<lb/>
<del>usually fatal to the highwayman's share</del>, no<lb/>
risk his neck for</note><lb/>
<del>Reforms</del> <add>opportunity of exculpation</add> is to be permitted.</p>
<del>usually fate to the highwayman's share</del>, no<lb/>
<del>Reforms</del><add>opportunity of exculpation</add> is to be permitted.</p>
 
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:27, 6 September 2021

Click Here To Edit

Vaughan

Sir

A variety of paragraphs having appeared
at on various a variety of occasions in the Times, glancing twilled
out reflecting on the gentleman undermentioned, sometimes by
name, at other times a mode of description not to be
mistaken, sometimes even by name, an attempt
was made, in the vain view for the purpose of public justice, to
defend answer but content vindicate the proceeding in question before on the same ground stage at the same tribunal
which exhibited the charge. The answer was,
that the defenceobservations might be very just, but if they
were inserted, five guineas must be paid. If
the same condition had been answered to the reserve had been maintained in regard to
publication of the charge as to that of the attack as in regard to the defence,
the demand would have been less unreasonable, or
rather the resonance of opportunity of making it would never
have existed had existence.

As it is The practice in this instance avowed
to be the custom of the paper.

According to this system plan, a newspaper, instead
of being a vehicle of public comment a useful intelligence, is to be an
instrument of extortion, by means of which individuals
are to be laid under contribution, by
being del>stigmatized by accusations against which harrassed by groundless imputations to which
they are not to be permitted to defend themselves
without delivering a purse heavier than what it is common for a highwayman to risk his neck for
usually fatal to the highwayman's share, no
Reforms opportunity of exculpation is to be permitted.


Identifier: | JB/169/236/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

236

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

57056

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in