★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1823. August 9</p> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> | |||
<note>III. Rationale<lb/> | |||
Ch. 13 <gap/> Judge<lb/> | |||
Introductory Observation</note><lb/> | |||
<note>5<lb/> | |||
Acceptance of office<lb/> | |||
on these terms a greater<lb/> | |||
proof of appropriate<lb/> | |||
aptitude thus a boasting<lb/> | |||
& pretended indignant<lb/> | |||
rejection</note><lb/> | |||
<p>Of <del>utter inaptitude of all</del> <add>appropriate</add> aptitude <del>for</del> with relation to the baseness<lb/> | |||
of these several offices which will be the most straight portative<lb/> | |||
evidence? acceptance of the office in those <unclear>liters</unclear>? or strutting<lb/> | |||
dem<gap/>, by <unclear>locks and boading plesures</unclear> <del>declining</del> declaratory<lb/> | |||
of <gap/> indignation pretended to be felt at the thoughts of a mans<lb/> | |||
being capable of giving acceptance to it an <gap/>.</p> | |||
<note>6<lb/> | |||
Non acceptance a<lb/> | |||
proof of inaptitude</note><lb/> | |||
<p>Of utter inaptitude with relation to the function of it<lb/> | |||
what <gap/> conclusive evidence can be afforded than the determination<lb/> | |||
<gap/> to accept of it upon these terms.</p> | |||
<note>7<lb/> | |||
In England enormity<lb/> | |||
of lawyers enrolement<lb/> | |||
held upon a reason for <lb/> | |||
corresponding enormity<lb/> | |||
in Judges emolument</note><lb/> | |||
<p>In England the enormity of the annul masses of enrolment<lb/> | |||
received by binding Advocates from the practice of this immoral<lb/> | |||
profession is held up to <gap/> with triumph as an adequate and<lb/> | |||
<gap/>able reason for correspondent enormity in the emoluments<lb/> | |||
attached to the Office of Judge of <add>highest</add> <del>superior</del> and next to highest<lb/> | |||
grade. For this <add>access</add> enormity though in adequate ra<gap/> the is still<lb/> | |||
a pl<gap/> are: the man prepamphlets of the law, and the presumption<lb/> | |||
that <add>by</add> the Advocate who has had most practise, the greatest <add>largest</add><lb/> | |||
quantum <add><gap/></add> if not only of appropriate knowledge but of appropriate<lb/> | |||
judgement will be possessed.</p> | |||
<note>8<lb/> | |||
In proposed Code, the<lb/> | |||
grand demand for <lb/> | |||
appropriate knowledge<lb/> | |||
on the part of Judges<lb/> | |||
done away by the<lb/> | |||
substitution of real to<lb/> | |||
fictitious law</note><lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1823. August 9
Constitutional Code.
III. Rationale
Ch. 13 Judge
Introductory Observation
5
Acceptance of office
on these terms a greater
proof of appropriate
aptitude thus a boasting
& pretended indignant
rejection
Of utter inaptitude of all appropriate aptitude for with relation to the baseness
of these several offices which will be the most straight portative
evidence? acceptance of the office in those liters? or strutting
dem, by locks and boading plesures declining declaratory
of indignation pretended to be felt at the thoughts of a mans
being capable of giving acceptance to it an .
6
Non acceptance a
proof of inaptitude
Of utter inaptitude with relation to the function of it
what conclusive evidence can be afforded than the determination
to accept of it upon these terms.
7
In England enormity
of lawyers enrolement
held upon a reason for
corresponding enormity
in Judges emolument
In England the enormity of the annul masses of enrolment
received by binding Advocates from the practice of this immoral
profession is held up to with triumph as an adequate and
able reason for correspondent enormity in the emoluments
attached to the Office of Judge of highest superior and next to highest
grade. For this access enormity though in adequate ra the is still
a pl are: the man prepamphlets of the law, and the presumption
that by the Advocate who has had most practise, the greatest largest
quantum if not only of appropriate knowledge but of appropriate
judgement will be possessed.
8
In proposed Code, the
grand demand for
appropriate knowledge
on the part of Judges
done away by the
substitution of real to
fictitious law
|
Identifier: | JB/042/162/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1823-08-09 |
5-8 |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
162 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d2 / e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1822 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1822 |
|||
|
13085 |
|||
