JB/015/283/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/015/283/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/015/283/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/283/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/283/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->132</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Though Hume has brought forward his virtues in a strangely disassociated &amp;<lb/>
 
disjointed state, it will be perhaps most convenient to take them in the disorder<lb/>
 
in which he leaves them.  No classification of them will make what is not virtue<lb/>
 
virtue – &amp; such virtue as is really in them will be found marshalled under the<lb/>
appropriate heads to which the virtue belongs.</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Sociability</hi>.  It is a disposition to seek the society of others.  It is good or<lb/>
bad. – virtuous or vicious – according to the purpose &amp; the conduct of<lb/>
the social man.  It has only so much <add>of</add> virtue in it, as it has of benevolence<lb/>
– &amp; if it be combined with benevolence, it becomes friendliness – friendliness<lb/>
which stands in Hume's list as a distinct virtue.  <add>A disposition</add> to avoid maleficence<lb/>
is generally a concomitant part of the social character, – &amp; thus far<lb/>
it is in accordance with the laws of negative effective benevolence.<lb/>
But <del>the</del> sociability may be accompanied &amp; is so not unfrequently<lb/>
particularly where exercised towards persons of different conditions with<lb/>
tyranny – or maleficence – it has <add>the</add> wit for one of its instruments, – wit<lb/>
of a pain-giving – or pleasure-destroying character.  Sociability may be<lb/>
used for the purposes of insolence – of which many examples <del>may</del> <add>are to</add> be<lb/>
found in the writings of Cicero.<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> "I was not thirteen" said Mr Bentham <add>on one occasion to the writer</add> "when the abominations <del>– the in</del> of Cicero shocked me /note>  It may ally itself with scorn as<lb/>
it did in the case of Burke, – so that a man hunting <add>over the field of sociability</add> for morality, –<lb/>
or happiness <del>will</del> <add>may</add> find neither.  Sociability then – standing alone – says nothing<lb/>
for good or evil.  It may represent self regard in a very offensive shape –&amp;<lb/>
become an instrument of self-eulogium for evil producing qualities.  It may<lb/>
be the <del>companion</del> <add>associate</add> of fraud &amp; rapine – &amp; lend the fascinations of<lb/>
its presence to every project of folly &amp; vice &amp; crime.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 06:15, 24 September 2021

Click Here To Edit

132

Though Hume has brought forward his virtues in a strangely disassociated &
disjointed state, it will be perhaps most convenient to take them in the disorder
in which he leaves them. No classification of them will make what is not virtue
virtue – & such virtue as is really in them will be found marshalled under the
appropriate heads to which the virtue belongs.

Sociability. It is a disposition to seek the society of others. It is good or
bad. – virtuous or vicious – according to the purpose & the conduct of
the social man. It has only so much of virtue in it, as it has of benevolence
– & if it be combined with benevolence, it becomes friendliness – friendliness
which stands in Hume's list as a distinct virtue. A disposition to avoid maleficence
is generally a concomitant part of the social character, – & thus far
it is in accordance with the laws of negative effective benevolence.
But the sociability may be accompanied & is so not unfrequently
particularly where exercised towards persons of different conditions with
tyranny – or maleficence – it has the wit for one of its instruments, – wit
of a pain-giving – or pleasure-destroying character. Sociability may be
used for the purposes of insolence – of which many examples may are to be
found in the writings of Cicero. <note> "I was not thirteen" said Mr Bentham on one occasion to the writer "when the abominations – the in of Cicero shocked me /note> It may ally itself with scorn as
it did in the case of Burke, – so that a man hunting over the field of sociability for morality, –
or happiness will may find neither. Sociability then – standing alone – says nothing
for good or evil. It may represent self regard in a very offensive shape –&
become an instrument of self-eulogium for evil producing qualities. It may
be the companion associate of fraud & rapine – & lend the fascinations of
its presence to every project of folly & vice & crime.


Identifier: | JB/015/283/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

283

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f132

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

j & m mills 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

john fraunceis gwyn

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

5499

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in