JB/109/146/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/109/146/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/109/146/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/109/146/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/109/146/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>1820 May 13</head><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Collectanea</head></p>
 
<p>Morn. Chron. May 13<lb/>
 
<head>"Diocese of Exeter.  Athanasian Creed.</head></p>
 
<p>"<hi rend="underline">Lord Holland</hi> rose to present a Petition from the Rev<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi><lb/>
"Pike Jones, Curate of North Bovey, in Devonshire, to which his<lb/>
"Lordship said, he thought it necessary to call the attention<lb/>
"of the House, by some preliminary observations.  <del>He thought it<lb/>
"first necessary to call the attention of the House, by the preliminary<lb/>
"observation</del>  He thought it first necessary to account<lb/>
"for the delay which had taken place in presenting the Petition,<lb/>
"the transactions to which it referred having taken<lb/>
place last September.  The fact was, that the Petition<lb/>
was handed in November last to a Noble Friend friend<lb/>
of his, whose distinguished eloquence would have done justice<lb/>
to, as his evident zeal for liberty would have led him<lb/>
warmly to espouse the cause of the Petitioner – he meant<lb/>
the Earl Grey.  Various circumstances, however, together<lb/>
with the unfortunate indisposition of that Noble Earl,<lb/>
prevented him from presenting it previous to the adjournment<lb/>
of Parliament, and afterwards when the Petition<lb/>
was handed to him (Lord Holland) he thought it most<lb/>
expedient to refrain from presenting it during the short<lb/>
interval previous to the dissolution of the last Parliament.<lb/>
His Lordship then entered into a narration of the<lb/>
case of the Petitioner, which want of room compels us to<lb/>
give as briefly as possible.  A county meeting having been<lb/>
held in Devonshire respecting the claims of the Roman<lb/>
Catholics, the Petitioner attended it and spoke in favour<lb/>
of making concessions to that body.  Shortly afterwards<lb/>
the Petitioner was presented to two livings, one in the<lb/>
Diocese of Peterborough and the other in that of Lincoln –<lb/>
in order to be instituted to which, it was necessary, according<lb/>
to the custom, for him to obtain testimonials<lb/>
as to his character, moral conduct, &amp;c. from three<lb/>
Clergymen who knew him, and to have those testimonials<lb/>
countersigned by the Bishop of the diocese<lb/>
in which he resided.  The Petitioner procured testimonials<lb/>
of a perfectly satisfactory nature from clergymen<lb/>
in his neighbourhood, but on handing those testimonials<lb/>
to the Bishop of Exeter, <del>who admitted</del> the<lb/>
latter refused to countersign them.  Application was<lb/>
made to the Bishops of Peterborough and Lincoln,<lb/>
but they both refused to institute the Petitioner to<lb/>
the livings alluded to, unless his testimonials were<lb/>
countersigned by the Bishop of Exeter.  The Petitioner then<lb/>
obtained a personal interview of the Bishop of Exeter, who<lb/>
admitted his fitness both on the ground of moral character<lb/>
and learning, but still refused to countersign his<lb/>
testimonials;  the Reverend and Learned Prelate stated that<lb/>
he was not bound to assign a reason for his refusal,<lb/>
but in candour and fairness he did, and the reason was,<lb/>
that the Petitioner had said at the County Meeting, that<lb/>
9-10<hi rend="superscript">ths</hi> of the clergy of England subscribed the 159 Articles<lb/>
<add>without</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:02, 8 October 2021

Click Here To Edit

1820 May 13
Collectanea

Morn. Chron. May 13
"Diocese of Exeter. Athanasian Creed.

"Lord Holland rose to present a Petition from the Revd.
"Pike Jones, Curate of North Bovey, in Devonshire, to which his
"Lordship said, he thought it necessary to call the attention
"of the House, by some preliminary observations. He thought it
"first necessary to call the attention of the House, by the preliminary
"observation
He thought it first necessary to account
"for the delay which had taken place in presenting the Petition,
"the transactions to which it referred having taken
place last September. The fact was, that the Petition
was handed in November last to a Noble Friend friend
of his, whose distinguished eloquence would have done justice
to, as his evident zeal for liberty would have led him
warmly to espouse the cause of the Petitioner – he meant
the Earl Grey. Various circumstances, however, together
with the unfortunate indisposition of that Noble Earl,
prevented him from presenting it previous to the adjournment
of Parliament, and afterwards when the Petition
was handed to him (Lord Holland) he thought it most
expedient to refrain from presenting it during the short
interval previous to the dissolution of the last Parliament.
His Lordship then entered into a narration of the
case of the Petitioner, which want of room compels us to
give as briefly as possible. A county meeting having been
held in Devonshire respecting the claims of the Roman
Catholics, the Petitioner attended it and spoke in favour
of making concessions to that body. Shortly afterwards
the Petitioner was presented to two livings, one in the
Diocese of Peterborough and the other in that of Lincoln –
in order to be instituted to which, it was necessary, according
to the custom, for him to obtain testimonials
as to his character, moral conduct, &c. from three
Clergymen who knew him, and to have those testimonials
countersigned by the Bishop of the diocese
in which he resided. The Petitioner procured testimonials
of a perfectly satisfactory nature from clergymen
in his neighbourhood, but on handing those testimonials
to the Bishop of Exeter, who admitted the
latter refused to countersign them. Application was
made to the Bishops of Peterborough and Lincoln,
but they both refused to institute the Petitioner to
the livings alluded to, unless his testimonials were
countersigned by the Bishop of Exeter. The Petitioner then
obtained a personal interview of the Bishop of Exeter, who
admitted his fitness both on the ground of moral character
and learning, but still refused to countersign his
testimonials; the Reverend and Learned Prelate stated that
he was not bound to assign a reason for his refusal,
but in candour and fairness he did, and the reason was,
that the Petitioner had said at the County Meeting, that
9-10ths of the clergy of England subscribed the 159 Articles
without


Identifier: | JB/109/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109.

Date_1

1820-05-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

109

Main Headings

Folio number

146

Info in main headings field

Collectanea

Image

001

Titles

Morn. Chron. May 13 / Diocese of Exeter / Athanasian Creed

Category

Collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"JC to RD Go on copying this debate till you come to the word adjourned, which is just at the top of the 2d column on the 3d side of the paper" [note in Coll's hand]]]

ID Number

35801

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in