JB/109/155/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/109/155/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/109/155/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/109/155/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/109/155/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>1820. May 21.</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Examiner May 21, 1820.</p>
 
<p>"We are much pleased with the prompt and enlightened<lb/>
 
manner in which the independent journals have<lb/>
 
discussed the Spy question, which indeed is one among<lb/>
the many proofs of the blessings of a free press that must<lb/>
endear it to the country. We have the satisfaction of<lb/>
following up our last weeks' article by the quoting some<lb/>
solid arguments from other papers:–</p>
<p>"He who allows of employing men to assume and<lb/>
profess to be what they are not, has no right to exclaim<lb/>
against <hi rend="underline">assassination</hi>, when the object in view<lb/>
is the good of society.  Both crimes proceed on the same<lb/>
principle of expedience, – that it is right to do evil that<lb/>
good may come.  Allow this in one case, and it must be<lb/>
conceded in all.  The rest is simply a matter of calculation.<lb/>
To deceive is an evil;  to betray is another;  to kill is<lb/>
only a third evil;  and if the two first offences may be<lb/>
committed* <note>* <hi rend="underline">to prevent</hi> a supposed greater evil, why may not the third be committed</note> to <hi rend="underline">correct or remove</hi> a supposed <hi rend="underline">existing evil</hi>?<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">We say</hi> they are forbidden, and alike contrary to the<lb/>
laws of Deity and man.  Were we possessed of an omniscient<lb/>
faculty, to give us a certainty that, when the evil<lb/>
was done, a more than countervailing good could follow,<lb/>
the principle might then be acted upon:  but, limited<lb/>
as our knowledge and faculties are, the evil<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">committed</hi> is certain, while the anticipated evil and the<lb/>
anticipated good are both problematical;  which is a sufficient<lb/>
moral prohibition;  but we must add also the<lb/>
pain and the guilt of acting in opposition not only to<lb/>
the dictates of a natural and necessary emotion but also<lb/>
to a positive religious injunction.  And how can those<lb/>
who declaim so much against the violation of Christian<lb/>
precepts, and the value of a Christian example, take it<lb/>
upon them openly to violate one of the most positive<lb/>
of our Christian commandments?  Or will M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Canning<lb/>
contend here also, that the revealed <hi rend="underline">laws</hi> of heaven must<lb/>
bend to the <hi rend="underline">practice</hi> of an earthly political faction?" –<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Scotsman</hi>.</p>
<p>"If bad tendencies and propensities prevail, they are<lb/>
generated by the circumstances of the times, which spies<lb/>
may, and necessarily do increase and stimulate, but never<lb/>
oppose or eradicate.  They make the bad worse,<lb/>
and the good unhappy." – <hi rend="underline">Scotsman</hi>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:07, 8 October 2021

Click Here To Edit

1820. May 21.

Examiner May 21, 1820.

"We are much pleased with the prompt and enlightened
manner in which the independent journals have
discussed the Spy question, which indeed is one among
the many proofs of the blessings of a free press that must
endear it to the country. We have the satisfaction of
following up our last weeks' article by the quoting some
solid arguments from other papers:–

"He who allows of employing men to assume and
profess to be what they are not, has no right to exclaim
against assassination, when the object in view
is the good of society. Both crimes proceed on the same
principle of expedience, – that it is right to do evil that
good may come. Allow this in one case, and it must be
conceded in all. The rest is simply a matter of calculation.
To deceive is an evil; to betray is another; to kill is
only a third evil; and if the two first offences may be
committed* * to prevent a supposed greater evil, why may not the third be committed to correct or remove a supposed existing evil?
We say they are forbidden, and alike contrary to the
laws of Deity and man. Were we possessed of an omniscient
faculty, to give us a certainty that, when the evil
was done, a more than countervailing good could follow,
the principle might then be acted upon: but, limited
as our knowledge and faculties are, the evil
committed is certain, while the anticipated evil and the
anticipated good are both problematical; which is a sufficient
moral prohibition; but we must add also the
pain and the guilt of acting in opposition not only to
the dictates of a natural and necessary emotion but also
to a positive religious injunction. And how can those
who declaim so much against the violation of Christian
precepts, and the value of a Christian example, take it
upon them openly to violate one of the most positive
of our Christian commandments? Or will Mr Canning
contend here also, that the revealed laws of heaven must
bend to the practice of an earthly political faction?" –
Scotsman.

"If bad tendencies and propensities prevail, they are
generated by the circumstances of the times, which spies
may, and necessarily do increase and stimulate, but never
oppose or eradicate. They make the bad worse,
and the good unhappy." – Scotsman.


Identifier: | JB/109/155/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109.

Date_1

1820-05-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

109

Main Headings

Parliamentary Reform

Folio number

155

Info in main headings field

Collectanea

Image

001

Titles

Examiner May 21 1820

Category

Collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"Copy down to the underlined word unhappy" [note in Colls's hand]]]

ID Number

35810

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in