JB/052/140/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:52, 12 October 2021

1827. May 12
Procedure Code

Ch. Preface in Conclusion
(1 §. All comprehensiveness
here proved

The matter proposed to be employed being thus in the present proposed Code being given —
what remains to be shown is that, of the nature in the present English
Books of Practice as they are called, what has not been here employed, is
either simply useless non conducive or positively — abductive with
reference to the ends of justice.

For this purpose What presents itself as the most satisfactory
course is this. Fort the several principal judicatories,
take the respective most accredited
Books of practice, and setting down the heads to
which the several portions of matter present
themselves as referable, mark and take account
of the several pages and lines in which are contained
the quantities of matter regarded as superseded.
Note the number of pages in each such
book, together with the number of the pages so
disposed of, and regarded as superseded. Conclude
by taking the sum of the aggregate of the whole.
For the grounds and reasons of supercession
in each instance, find expressions, in the penning
of which, by single worded or other short appellations,
once for all defined or otherwise expounded,
compression and brevity or say conciseness, may
be maximized.

Like reference to Bonaparte's Codes.

Identifier: \| JB/052/140/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.
Date_1	1827-05-12	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	052	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	140	Info in main headings field	procedure code
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e1
Penner	john flowerdew colls	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1826
Marginals		Paper Producer	jonathan blenman
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year	1826
Notes public		ID Number	16813
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>1827. May 12<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Preface in Conclusion</note><lb/>(1 <note>&sect;. All comprehensiveness<lb/>here proved</note></p> <!-- additional paragraph in Bentham's hand --><p>The matter proposed to be employed being thus <add>in the present proposed Code being</add> by this <hi rend="underline">given</hi> &#x2014;<lb/>what remains to be shown is that, of the nature in the present English<lb/><hi rend="underline">Books of Practice</hi> as they are called, what has not been <gap/> <add>here</add> employed, is<lb/>either simply useless  <add>non conducive</add> or positively <del><gap/></del> <gap/> &#x2014; <hi rend="underline">abductive</hi> with<lb/>reference to the ends of justice.</p> <p><add>For that purpose</add>  That presents itself as the most satisfactory<lb/>course is this. Fort the several principal judicatories,<lb/>take the respective most accredited<lb/><hi rend="underline">Books of practice</hi>, and setting down the heads to<lb/>which the several portions of matter present<lb/>themselves as referable, mask and take account<lb/>of the several pages and lines in which are contained<lb/>the quantities of matter regarded as superseded.<lb/>Note the number of pages in each such<lb/>book, together with the number of the pages so<lb/>disposed of, and regarded as superseded.  Conclude<lb/>by taking the sum of the aggregate of the who9le.<lb/>For the grounds and reasons of <sic>supercession</sic><lb/>in each instance, find expressions, in the penning<lb/>of which, by single minded or other short appellations,<lb/>once for all defined or otherwise expounded,<lb/>compression and brevity or say conciseness, may<lb/>be maximized.</p> <p>Like reference to Bonaparte's Codes.</p>
+<head>1827. May 12<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Preface in Conclusion</note><lb/>(1 <note>&sect;. All comprehensiveness<lb/>here proved</note></p> <!-- additional paragraph in Bentham's hand --><p>The matter proposed to be employed being thus <add>in the present proposed Code being</add> <hi rend="underline">given</hi> &#x2014;<lb/>what remains to be shown is that, of the nature in the present English<lb/><hi rend="underline">Books of Practice</hi> as they are called, what has not been <gap/> <add>here</add> employed, is<lb/>either simply useless  <add>non conducive</add> or positively <del><gap/></del> <gap/> &#x2014; <hi rend="underline">abductive</hi> with<lb/>reference to the ends of justice.</p> <p><add>For this purpose</add> What presents itself as the most satisfactory<lb/>course is this. Fort the several principal judicatories,<lb/>take the respective most accredited<lb/><hi rend="underline">Books of practice</hi>, and setting down the heads to<lb/>which the several portions of matter present<lb/>themselves as referable, mark and take account<lb/>of the several pages and lines in which are contained<lb/>the quantities of matter regarded as superseded.<lb/>Note the number of pages in each such<lb/>book, together with the number of the pages so<lb/>disposed of, and regarded as superseded.  Conclude<lb/>by taking the sum of the aggregate of the whole.<lb/>For the grounds and reasons of <sic>supercession</sic><lb/>in each instance, find expressions, in the penning<lb/>of which, by single worded or other short appellations,<lb/>once for all defined or otherwise expounded,<lb/>compression and brevity or say conciseness, may<lb/>be maximized.</p> <!-- addition in Bentham's hand --><p>Like reference to Bonaparte's Codes.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/052/140/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:52, 12 October 2021

Navigation

Search