JB/067/040/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/067/040/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/067/040/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/067/040/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>May 1809<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Prefs.</head></p>
 
<p>1<lb/>
 
Note <gap/> <gap/> double<lb/>
fee practice is in the<lb/>
teeth of a Statute<lb/>
4 G.2. c.18 S.2.  p.1</p>
<p>2<lb/>
Hence three distinguishable<lb/>
offences –<lb/>
1.  Waste of public money<lb/>
2.  Corruption<lb/>
3.  Contempt of Parl<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>
of which corruption<lb/>
alone is open to<lb/>
dispute.  p.1</p>
<p>3<lb/>
Plea – King not<lb/>
bound, unless named√
the King i:e:  anybody<lb/>
else who to the convenience<lb/>
adds the power<lb/>
of acting as such –<lb/>
ex. gr. Ch. Justice of <gap/><lb/>
in d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> C<hi rend="superscript">t:  or, by parity<lb/>
of reason any other Judge<lb/>
or Judges.  p.2.</hi></p>
<p>4.<lb/>
Suppose the double<lb/>
fees in question given.<lb/>
The disobedience to the<lb/>
Act being unquestionable,<lb/>
the only possible plea<lb/>
for the <gap/> <add>of <gap/></add> or <add><unclear>from</unclear></add> Secretary<lb/>
of the Treasury is the<lb/>
above.  p.2.</p>
<p>5.<lb/>
In the Times reply<lb/>
the Debate the Atty Gen<hi rend="superscript">l</hi><lb/>
declares his abhorrence<lb/>
of this practice.<lb/>
Of this abhorrence<lb/>
what are the consequences<lb/>
to the public &amp; the delinquents?<lb/>
Prosecution? or a<lb/>
repetition of abhorrence<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">toties quoties</hi>? whereby<lb/>
vice produces perpetual<lb/>
crops of virtue.  p.4.</p>
<p>6.<lb/>
Under libel law for<lb/>
delinquency in high<lb/>
stations punishment is<lb/>
never incurred by the<lb/>
delinquent.</p>
<pb/>
<p>6.<lb/>
Under Libel law for<lb/>
delinquency in high<lb/>
stations, punishment<lb/>
is never incurred by<lb/>
the delinquent always<lb/>
by the indicator or complainer.<lb/>
Thence the persons<lb/>
who, if guilty, have<lb/>
nothing to fear are<lb/>
<hi rend="underline"><unclear>Mac</unclear></hi>, his Dep.  Remember<lb/>
Atty Gen<hi rend="superscript">l</hi> or Treasury</hi>
<gap/> of the time, but</hi>
J.B. &amp; also since the</hi>
recent improvement</hi>
could not save himself</hi>
by banishment.  p.5.</p>
<p>7</hi>
A new <hi rend="underline">Restoration</hi> little</hi>
less felicitous, howsoever</hi>
hopeless, than the old</hi>
one, wo<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> be the restoration</hi>
of the King to that</hi>
part of his throne out</hi>
of which he has been</hi>
thrust by Judge &amp; Co.  p.6.</p>
<pb/>
<!-- Is the balance of the text notes? -->


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 23:49, 14 October 2021

Click Here To Edit

May 1809
Prefs.

1
Note double
fee practice is in the
teeth of a Statute
4 G.2. c.18 S.2. p.1

2
Hence three distinguishable
offences –
1. Waste of public money
2. Corruption
3. Contempt of Parlt of which corruption
alone is open to
dispute. p.1

3
Plea – King not
bound, unless named√ the King i:e: anybody
else who to the convenience
adds the power
of acting as such –
ex. gr. Ch. Justice of
in do. Ct: or, by parity
of reason any other Judge
or Judges. p.2.

4.
Suppose the double
fees in question given.
The disobedience to the
Act being unquestionable,
the only possible plea
for the of or from Secretary
of the Treasury is the
above. p.2.

5.
In the Times reply
the Debate the Atty Genl
declares his abhorrence
of this practice.
Of this abhorrence
what are the consequences
to the public & the delinquents?
Prosecution? or a
repetition of abhorrence
toties quoties? whereby
vice produces perpetual
crops of virtue. p.4.

6.
Under libel law for
delinquency in high
stations punishment is
never incurred by the
delinquent.


---page break---

6.
Under Libel law for
delinquency in high
stations, punishment
is never incurred by
the delinquent always
by the indicator or complainer.
Thence the persons
who, if guilty, have
nothing to fear are
Mac, his Dep. Remember
Atty Genl or Treasury</hi> of the time, but</hi> J.B. & also since the</hi> recent improvement</hi> could not save himself</hi> by banishment. p.5.

7</hi> A new Restoration little</hi> less felicitous, howsoever</hi> hopeless, than the old</hi> one, wod be the restoration</hi> of the King to that</hi> part of his throne out</hi> of which he has been</hi> thrust by Judge & Co. p.6.


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/067/040/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 67.

Date_1

1809-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-7

Box

067

Main Headings

liberty of the press

Folio number

040

Info in main headings field

press ch. double fee abuse

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

21873

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in