★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/149/218/003": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/218/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/149/218/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>In the first place it was a novelty <add><del>a for which the consequences would contribute fact <gap/></del></add> that the<lb/> | |||
Chancellor should sit in the Court not as an original<lb/> | |||
Judge – but as a judge of appeal. He understood that –<lb/> | |||
"with a very few exceptions" (N.B. Not certain as to those<lb/> | |||
<add>original</add> causes – <del>further</del> exceptions and further directions – motions<lb/> | |||
– petitions – pleas and demurrers were to be decided<lb/> | |||
by the two other judges – and that when parties<lb/> | |||
were not satisfied with their decisions they were<lb/> | |||
to have the right of appealing to the Chancellor. – In his<lb/> | |||
opinion this plan would in the end destroy the<lb/> | |||
whole system of equity founded on the rules<lb/> | |||
and principles laid down by Lords Nottingham –<lb/> | |||
Talbot – and Hardwicke – a system peculiar to<lb/> | |||
this country and forming the law of the<lb/> | |||
Court of Chancery – a system depending <add>in a great measure</add> for the preservation<lb/> | |||
of its uniformity and consistency upon<lb/> | |||
its administration <del>made it <gap/> have</del> by <del>one</del> the<lb/> | |||
same judge – who <del>by</del> having his mind constantly<lb/> | |||
exercised <del>upon the several parties</del> upon all<lb/> | |||
its branches would readily, when necessary, bring<lb/> | |||
the whole doctrines of the Court to bear upon any<lb/> | |||
particular case. If this committee were granted<lb/> | |||
he thought he could shew <del>that</del> it to be<lb/> | |||
absolutely essential to the <add>due</add> administration of<lb/> | |||
justice in that Court "that the Judge<lb/> | |||
should be in the <del><gap/></del> daily habit of doing<lb/> | |||
business in it – that it was a novelty incompatible<lb/> | |||
with its constitution to make the<lb/> | |||
Chancellor a mere Judge of Appeal – that this<lb/> | |||
innovation would <del>be</del> undermine the system</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
In the first place it was a novelty a for which the consequences would contribute fact that the
Chancellor should sit in the Court not as an original
Judge – but as a judge of appeal. He understood that –
"with a very few exceptions" (N.B. Not certain as to those
original causes – further exceptions and further directions – motions
– petitions – pleas and demurrers were to be decided
by the two other judges – and that when parties
were not satisfied with their decisions they were
to have the right of appealing to the Chancellor. – In his
opinion this plan would in the end destroy the
whole system of equity founded on the rules
and principles laid down by Lords Nottingham –
Talbot – and Hardwicke – a system peculiar to
this country and forming the law of the
Court of Chancery – a system depending in a great measure for the preservation
of its uniformity and consistency upon
its administration made it have by one the
same judge – who by having his mind constantly
exercised upon the several parties upon all
its branches would readily, when necessary, bring
the whole doctrines of the Court to bear upon any
particular case. If this committee were granted
he thought he could shew that it to be
absolutely essential to the due administration of
justice in that Court "that the Judge
should be in the daily habit of doing
business in it – that it was a novelty incompatible
with its constitution to make the
Chancellor a mere Judge of Appeal – that this
innovation would be undermine the system
Identifier: | JB/149/218/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825 |
|||
149 |
constitutional code |
||
218 |
|||
003 |
on the report of the commission for enquiring into the state of the court of chancery |
||
copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
c1 / / / |
||
[[watermarks::[fleur de lys motif]]] |
|||
50072 |
|||