JB/149/223/002

Click Here To Edit

Chancellor – that question would be
open for discussion when the bill came
before them. Neither of the houses, that
he was aware of, had made up their
minds upon that point.

But this committee was wanted to
ascertain the causes of the delay in
Chancery. They had already however one
cause before them which was sufficient
to account for the effect – the great increase
of motions was in proof – and he should
wish, he owned, to adopt that regulation
which appeared to have received the
general if not the unimous unanimous
approbation of the other house –
Whether for a time only – was openv to further consideration. For his part
he did not think the evil of a temorary
description – but that it grew
out of the increased opulence of the
country distributed among a greater
variety of hands and by that means
increasing the number of suits – and
being of this opinion he was anxious
that the remedy should be applied as
soon as possible. His hon. and learned
friend had said that this new office would
be a sinecure – but if there was
such a failure of justice as had

Identifier: | JB/149/223/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	149	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	223	Info in main headings field
Image	002	Titles	1825 or 1826 / on the report of the commission for enquiring / into the state of the / court of chancery
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c6 / / /
Penner		Watermarks	iping 1810
Marginals		Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year	1810
Notes public		ID Number	50077
Box Contents