JB/149/227/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/149/227/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/149/227/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/227/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/227/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>be remedied. – The Report of the Lords<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<del>was accordingly <gap/> in though<lb/>
 
<gap/> <gap/> the <gap/></del> was extremely<lb/>
 
defective in not stating how many<lb/>
 
appeals were entered in any one year<lb/>
and how many were decided.  It<lb/>
furnished no information except<lb/>
that the whole number of appeals<lb/>
were 296 and of <del>the</del> writs of error<lb/>
42. – He knew this fact that <del>be true<lb/>
of <gap/> and <gap/> in<lb/>
the number</del> at the time of the<lb/>
union with Ireland he himself had<lb/>
been employed as Counsel in the very last<lb/>
case of appeal that stood on the Roll – and<lb/>
he was therefore convinced that the whole<lb/>
accumulation must have taken place<lb/>
since that time. <del>for the</del> When Lord Roslyn<lb/>
was Chancellor he knew that the arrear<lb/>
of appeals was always very small indeed.<lb/>
After some further observations on the<lb/>
defective information in the Report<lb/>
he stated his conviction that a temporary<lb/>
execution would cure the evil.  If the<lb/>
Master of the Rolls were to sit at<lb/>
the same time with the Chancellor<lb/>
and thus enable the Chancellor to<lb/>
devote more time to the hearing</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 23:07, 17 October 2021

Click Here To Edit

be remedied. – The Report of the Lords
was accordingly in though
the
was extremely
defective in not stating how many
appeals were entered in any one year
and how many were decided. It
furnished no information except
that the whole number of appeals
were 296 and of the writs of error
42. – He knew this fact that be true
of and in
the number
at the time of the
union with Ireland he himself had
been employed as Counsel in the very last
case of appeal that stood on the Roll – and
he was therefore convinced that the whole
accumulation must have taken place
since that time. for the When Lord Roslyn
was Chancellor he knew that the arrear
of appeals was always very small indeed.
After some further observations on the
defective information in the Report
he stated his conviction that a temporary
execution would cure the evil. If the
Master of the Rolls were to sit at
the same time with the Chancellor
and thus enable the Chancellor to
devote more time to the hearing


Identifier: | JB/149/227/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

227

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

[[titles::ao 18.. [sic] / debate / m. a. taylor's motions / as to the / court of chancery]]

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / / /

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[fleur de lys motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50081

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in