★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/119/107/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/119/107/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/119/107/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>There are two systems of policy with regard<lb/> | |||
to the military: the old English, and the modern<lb/> | |||
French: each in its day <add>may have</add> had its <del><gap/></del> reason and<lb/> | |||
its use. The one is to <del>cause</del> <add>threat them as <del>f</del> enemies</add> keeping them under<lb/> | |||
and make <add>kept them under, by making</add> them odious to the people: the other<lb/> | |||
is to <del>gain their</del> <add>win them over</add> and consider <add>make</add> them as one with<lb/> | |||
the people. The latter I must own is that<lb/> | |||
which I prefer. But the old English black-letter<lb/> | |||
policy is growing out of date. I wish we were<lb/> | |||
well rid of it. The French if one may venture<lb/> | |||
to say as much, seems the broader-bottomed,<lb/> | |||
the more generous and more enlightened of the<lb/> | |||
two: the more suited to modern reason <add>situations</add> and to<lb/> | |||
modern times. The old English black-letter<lb/> | |||
policy is growing out <del>ord</del> of date: I wish we <add>it is time<lb/> | |||
we were</add> were well rid of it. Cunning tyrants at seeing<lb/> | |||
this oversight <add>burn</add> on the part of the friends of liberty<lb/> | |||
laugh in their sleeve: they see them during their<lb/> | |||
work: by setting the people against the military,<lb/> | |||
they are setting the military against them. Divide<lb/> | |||
et <unclear>conquer</unclear> is one of the one of the first lessons in the spelling-book<lb/> | |||
of tyrants. Those who decried the <gap/> Act<lb/> | |||
<add>planting</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} | ||
There are two systems of policy with regard
to the military: the old English, and the modern
French: each in its day may have had its reason and
its use. The one is to cause threat them as f enemies keeping them under
and make kept them under, by making them odious to the people: the other
is to gain their win them over and consider make them as one with
the people. The latter I must own is that
which I prefer. But the old English black-letter
policy is growing out of date. I wish we were
well rid of it. The French if one may venture
to say as much, seems the broader-bottomed,
the more generous and more enlightened of the
two: the more suited to modern reason situations and to
modern times. The old English black-letter
policy is growing out ord of date: I wish we it is time
we were were well rid of it. Cunning tyrants at seeing
this oversight burn on the part of the friends of liberty
laugh in their sleeve: they see them during their
work: by setting the people against the military,
they are setting the military against them. Divide
et conquer is one of the one of the first lessons in the spelling-book
of tyrants. Those who decried the Act
planting
|
Identifier: | JB/119/107/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
119 |
panopticon |
||
|
107 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
arthur young |
|||
|
39618 |
|||
