JB/029/006/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/029/006/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/029/006/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/029/006/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/029/006/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>Reforms French.
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1. Church benefices<lb/>
 
2. Feudal rights<lb/>
[[first rough go over, very messy, apologies to whoever follows this up if I don't!]
3. Judicial offices hand off as not value<lb/>
Reforms French.
4. Pennons <gap/> off or diminished.<lb/>
1. Church ??
5. Plans <add>unbrought</add> abolished without equivalent<lb/>
2. Feudal rights
6. Hints in him of antient servitude abolished without <del>recompense</del> indemnity.</p>
3. Judicial offices ... value
<p>English<lb/>
4. .... ????
Uncompensated<lb/>
5. Plans ...
Abolition of Places held during pleasure.</p>
6. Trusts? in lieu of mutual ??? ... abolished without ...  
<p>Restitution<lb/>
 
French<lb/>
 
French Protestants to estates forfeited <gap/>. Louis 14</p>
[[2nd col]]
<p>English<lb/>
[x/A reform is not beneficial, but pernicious in ]
Rebels of 1745<lb/>
 
Rebels of 1715</p>
A reform which
<p>Polit. Economy<lb/>
operates [/by the] to the
Sudden application of <unclear>discouragement</unclear> – moral of encouragements.</p>
sacrifice of subsisting
<pb/>
prejudice of inte
<p><del>[IV A<lb/>
rests already sub
A reform is not beneficial, but pernicious in</del></p>
sisting, is in  
<p>A reform which<lb/>
so far as it oper
operates to the <add>by the</add><lb/>
rates in that
sacrifice of subsisting<lb/>
manner,  
prejudice of interests<lb/>
not beneficial, but
already subsisting,<lb/>
prejudicial to the state.
is in<lb/>
 
so far as it operates<lb/>
A reform which  
in that<lb/>
[x/operates any other way [/instead] than] by  
manner, not<lb/>
preventing the
beneficial, but<lb/>
birth of expectations
prejudicial to the<lb/>
of [/superfluous] unnecessary?
state.</p>
salary or emolu
<p>A reform which <lb/>
ment operates
<del>operates any otherwise<lb/>
by the  
than to</del> <add>instead</add> by<lb/>
disappointment
preventing the<lb/>
of [facets of?] expectation al
birth of expectations<lb/>
ready formed is
of <add>superfluous</add> unnecessary<lb/>
as far as it
salary or emolument<lb/>
operates in that man
operates<lb/>
ner not benefici
by the <del>reduction</del><lb/>
al but [/injurious] prejudicia
disappointment<lb/>
al to the state  
of <add>habits</add> of expectation already<lb/>
 
formed is<lb/>
[3rd col]
as far as it operates<lb/>
It is to its immortality, that the state is indebted for the only means it has of giving? ? relief from [][] any permanent burthen
in that manner<lb/>
which [the?] profusion? [/of government] may have imposed
not beneficial but prejudicial <add>injurious</add><lb/>
 
to the state.</p>
The principle of natural rights admits of no compromise.  
<pb/>
Instead of rights talk of expectations.
<p>It is to its immortality,<lb/>
How much superior has English instinct? proved itself been to French reason!
that<lb/>
 
the state is indebted<lb/>
The Faith of the French Athiest oustraips in comparison of ??? was a ??? thus French cried the ... ?  sceptic in comparison ... scepticism .... son of a French Athiest ... [At those is] ....
for the only means it<lb/>
not one infallible ... France ...
has of gaining<lb/>
But ... infallibles ...
real relief from<lb/>
 
<del>whatever</del>any<lb/>
[4th col]
permanent burthen<lb/>
 
which <add>the</add> profusion <add>of government</add> may have<lb/>
Expectation! The Expectation is the grand word that ought to be perpetually sounding in the ears of whoever undertakes to [/construct] compose or modify a code of civil law. Expectation is the basis of every proprietary right: it is this affords whatever reason there can be for adjudging? giving a thing to one? man rather than another.
imposed</p>
 
<p>The principle of<lb/>
Keep the current of expectation [/undisturbed] inviolate in these words are contained [x/the ???] of the great landmark of the civil code, the ???? of every thing which utility can dictate on this extensive ground.  
natural rights admitts<lb/>
 
of no compromise.</p>
[5th col]
<p>Instead of rights<lb/>
1
talk of expectations.</p>
Of schemes for the equalisation of property
<p>How much superior<lb/>
2
<add>is</add> has English instinct<lb/>
Of the plan of economical ... reform as executed under the French Revolution.  
<add>proved itself</add> been to French<lb/>
3
reason!</p>
Of the restitution of existent confiscations
<p>The faith of the<lb/>
 
French Atheist outstrips<lb/>
Metaphysics
In comparison of Athanasius was a <lb/>
To load? the essence of metaphysics with the infamy of ill [/such] ... and such mischief is as unreasonable as it would be to call the actions of it harmony? metaphysicians. The ... of the ... science called metaphysics ... have ... happier choice?: but to such facts? [x/ ....] is as reasonable as could be to impute the intem??? to play???, knavery to ???, as ... to workmaking?.
this French creed the<lb/>
 
sceptic in comparison of a French Atheist:  <add>Athanasius is <gap/> scepticism. </add> .<del>there are</del>. [<add>At Rome is</add>]<lb/>
... confusion of ideas to the ...
not one infallible<lb/>
 
[in France <del>to be</del><lb/>
[6th col]
but twelve  hundred<lb/>
As far as concerns the mischief of the 1st order it stands upon the same footing as a common arl? of robbery. It is attended with all that mischief which ... commonly have ... when they think of robbery, [and regard it as an object must for ... interest.]
infallibles.</p>
 
<pb/>
...
<p>Expectation! this<lb/>
 
Expectation is<lb/>
[7th col]
the grand word<lb/>
If the Church dignatary who lost has benefited state pensioner who lost his pension, [/was] or the lawyer? who lost ... and  
that ought <del>never</del> <add>to be</add><lb/>
 
perpetually<lb/>
...
sounding in<lb/>
 
the ears of whoever<lb/>
The language was that the Church dignitary, the pensioner, the placeman, the feudal ??? were more selfish more attentive ? to their property, than other men: and this observation [/circumstance] which had ...
undertakes<lb/>
 
to compose <add>construct</add> or<lb/>
[8th col]
modify a code<lb/>
... but say they the Churchman had no property: and where there is no property there is no injustice. The breach which fuels the mechanic, the proprietor?
of civil law.</p>
 
<p>Expectation is the<lb/>
Of the widow whose means of subsistence consists in the inheritance? interest? of a sum of money, forced reduction of the state of interest might ... have made an addition to that amount of the wealth of nations, but it remains yet to be proved that £20 a year is worth ... to the widow who has £500 to lend, then to the landowner or the manufacturer that wants to borrow it.
basis of every<lb/>
 
proprietary right:<lb/>
... had if any truth on it would have enbraced? ... the justice ... of the reason? chief was ... ? relied on asn an argument in justification of the measure. ...
it is this affords<lb/>
 
whatever reason<lb/>
 
there can be for<lb/>
 
<add>adjudging</add> giving a thing<lb/>
 
to one man rather<lb/>
 
than another.</p>
<p>Keep the current<lb/>
of expectation<lb/>
<add>undisturbed</add> inviolate:<lb/>
in these words<lb/>
are contained<lb/>
<del>the quintessence<lb/>
of</del> the great<lb/>
landmark o<lb/>
the civil code,<lb/>
the quintessence<lb/>
of every thing<lb/>
which utility<lb/>
can dictate on<lb/>
this extensive<lb/>
ground.</p>
<pb/>
<p>1<lb/>
Of schemes for<lb/>
the equalisation<lb/>
of property</p>
<p>2<lb/>
Of <add>the</add> plans of<lb/>
economical <del>as</del><lb/>
reform as executed<lb/>
under the French Revolution.</p>
<p>3<lb/>
Of the restitution<lb/>
of antient confiscations.</p>
<p>Metaphysics<lb/>
To load the science<lb/>
of metaphysics<lb/>
with the infamy of all <add>such</add> the<lb/>
nonsense and<lb/>
such mischief is as unreasonable<lb/>
as it would be to<lb/>
call the authors of it <unclear>knowing</unclear><lb/>
metaphysicians.<lb/>
The name of the<lb/>
science called<lb/>
metaphysics might<lb/
have been happier<lb/>
chosen: but to impute<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> to impute the confusion<lb/>
of ideas to the science<lb/>
of which the endeavout<lb/>
as to <unclear>keep</unclear> them clear</note> <del>and <gap/><lb/>
to them <gap/><lb/>
whatever be <gap/></del><lb/>
is as reasonable as it<lb/>
<del>is</del> would be to impute the<lb/>
intemperance <del>of</del><lb/>
to physics, knavery<lb/>
to Ethics, or want<lb/>
of functionality to<lb/>
watchmaking.</p>
<pb/>
<p>As far as concerns<lb/>
the mischief of the<lb/>
1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> order it stands<lb/>
upon the same footing<lb/>
as a common act<lb/>
of robbery. It is<lb/>
attended with all<lb/>
that mischief which<lb/>
men commonly have<lb/>
in view when they<lb/>
think of robbery <add>an act</add>, [and<lb/>
regard it as an object<lb/>
meet for punishment.]</p>
<p><del>If  a person of <gap/></del></p>
<p>If the passenger<lb/>
who was robbed of<lb/>
his purse t'other day<lb/>
on the highway had<lb/>
had neither wants <del>or</del><lb/>
nor feelings, or the<lb/>
money he was robbed<lb/>
of had been worth<lb/>
nothing to him, the<lb/>
<del>act</del> revolution effected<lb/>
by the highway man<lb/>
who robbed him of it<lb/>
would <add>might</add> have been beneficial<lb/>
to the state.</p>
<pb/>
<p>If the Church<lb/>
dignitary who<lb/>
lost has benefice<lb/>
the state pensioner<lb/>
who lost his pension, or <add>was</add> the<lb/>
<del>proprietor of</del> <add>Seigneur who lost</add> feudal<lb/>
rights <del>sho</del><lb/>
and the proprietor<lb/>
of an office who<lb/>
receives an inadequate<lb/>
price for it had neither<lb/>
wants nor feelings, or <add>if</add> the emoluments<lb/>
they<lb/>
found themselves<lb/>
bereft of had <add>had</add> no<lb/>
value in their hands<lb/>
been worth nothing<lb/>
to them.</p>
<p>The language<lb/>
was that the<lb/>
Church dignitary,<lb/>
the pensioner,<lb/>
the placeman, the feudal proprietor<lb/>
were more<lb/>
selfish more attached<lb/>
to their property,<lb/>
than other men: and this<lb/>
observation <add>circumstance</add> which<lb/>
<add>had</add> it any truth in it<lb/>
would have encreased <add>enhanced</add><lb/>
the <add>public</add> mischief<lb/>
<add>of the measure</add> was <del>tal</del><lb/>
relied on <add>dwelt upon</add> as an<lb/>
argument in<lb/>
justification of the<lb/>
measure.</p>
<pb/>
<p>Nay but say they<lb/>
the Churchman had<lb/>
no property: and<lb/>
where there is no<lb/>
property there is<lb/>
no injustice. The<lb/>
bread which feeds<lb/>
the mechanic, the <lb/>
shopkeeper or<lb/>
landowner, is the<lb/>
property of the landowner<lb/>
the shop-keeper<lb/>
or the mechanic:<lb/>
but the bread which<lb/>
feeds the Churchman<lb/>
is not his property<lb/>
the property of the Churchman.</p>
<p>If the widow whose<lb/>
means of subsistence<lb/>
consists in the interest<lb/>
of a sum of<lb/>
money, <del>the</del> forced<lb/>
reductions of the rate<lb/>
of interest might<lb/>
<del>If her</del> have made<lb/>
an addition to that<lb/>
amount to the wealth<lb/>
of nations, but it<lb/>
remains yet to be<lb/>
proved that £20<lb/>
a year is worth less<lb/>
to the widow who<lb/>
has £500 to lend,<lb/>
than to the landowner<lb/>
<add>improver</add> or the manufacturer<lb/>
that wants<lb/>
to borrow it.<lb/>
As the savings of<lb/>
the land-improver<lb/>
and manufacturer<lb/>
accumulate <add>encrease</add>, the<lb/>
money <add>treasured <unclear>mite</unclear></add> of the helpless<lb/>
widow is worth<lb/>
less and less to them<lb/>
and they will give less<lb/>
and less for the use<lb/>
of it:  but is any<lb/>
thing added to the<lb/>
wealth of the state by<lb/>
forcing her to take less for<lb/>
her money than they would<lb/>
be content to give for it.</p>
<pb/>
<p>If Madame de<lb/>
la Grange had<lb/>
been a member of<lb/>
the National Assembly,<lb/>
she might<lb/>
have proved that<lb/>
she had poisoned<lb/>
nobody, or that poisoning<lb/>
was no injury.<lb/>
Arsenic,<lb/>
she might have<lb/>
said is the same<lb/>
thing with sugar:<lb/>
and sugar is a<lb/>
sweet and wholesome<lb/>
aliment.</p>
<pb/>
<p><hi rend="underline">Oh, but those overgrown<lb/>
Churchmen<lb/>
were idle:  they did<lb/>
next to nothing for their<lb/>
money</hi>.  If they<lb/>
had done absolutely<lb/>
nothing would they<lb/>
have been any otherwise<lb/>
than upon a<lb/>
part with the landowner<lb/>
of equal<lb/>
income?</p>
<p>Oh but the landowner<lb/>
got children – perhaps so<lb/>
and so would the<lb/>
Churchman of pretend<lb/>
lit from, <del>When<lb/>
is the most of</del> <add>understand the satisfaction</add><lb/>
of getting<lb/>
and of leaving children:<lb/>
but where<lb/>
is the merit of it.<lb/>
If it is of no use<lb/>
to the state that<lb/>
the Churchman now<lb/>
he is begotten should<lb/>
be fed, what was the<lb/>
use of getting him?</p>
<p>If a race of idlers<lb/>
are to succeed one<lb/>
another what difference<lb/>
does it make<lb/>
to the state whether<lb/>
they are of the same<lb/>
blood or different<lb/>
bloods?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:50, 18 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

Reforms French. 1. Church benefices
2. Feudal rights
3. Judicial offices hand off as not value
4. Pennons off or diminished.
5. Plans unbrought abolished without equivalent
6. Hints in him of antient servitude abolished without recompense indemnity.

English
Uncompensated
Abolition of Places held during pleasure.

Restitution
French
French Protestants to estates forfeited . Louis 14

English
Rebels of 1745
Rebels of 1715

Polit. Economy
Sudden application of discouragement – moral of encouragements.


---page break---

[IV A
A reform is not beneficial, but pernicious in

A reform which
operates to the by the
sacrifice of subsisting
prejudice of interests
already subsisting,
is in
so far as it operates
in that
manner, not
beneficial, but
prejudicial to the
state.

A reform which
operates any otherwise
than to
instead by
preventing the
birth of expectations
of superfluous unnecessary
salary or emolument
operates
by the reduction
disappointment
of habits of expectation already
formed is
as far as it operates
in that manner
not beneficial but prejudicial injurious
to the state.


---page break---

It is to its immortality,
that
the state is indebted
for the only means it
has of gaining
real relief from
whateverany
permanent burthen
which the profusion of government may have
imposed

The principle of
natural rights admitts
of no compromise.

Instead of rights
talk of expectations.

How much superior
is has English instinct
proved itself been to French
reason!

The faith of the
French Atheist outstrips
In comparison of Athanasius was a
this French creed the
sceptic in comparison of a French Atheist: Athanasius is scepticism. .there are. [At Rome is]
not one infallible
[in France to be
but twelve hundred
infallibles.


---page break---

Expectation! this
Expectation is
the grand word
that ought never to be
perpetually
sounding in
the ears of whoever
undertakes
to compose construct or
modify a code
of civil law.

Expectation is the
basis of every
proprietary right:
it is this affords
whatever reason
there can be for
adjudging giving a thing
to one man rather
than another.

Keep the current
of expectation
undisturbed inviolate:
in these words
are contained
the quintessence
of
the great
landmark o
the civil code,
the quintessence
of every thing
which utility
can dictate on
this extensive
ground.


---page break---

1
Of schemes for
the equalisation
of property

2
Of the plans of
economical as
reform as executed
under the French Revolution.

3
Of the restitution
of antient confiscations.

Metaphysics
To load the science
of metaphysics
with the infamy of all such the
nonsense and
such mischief is as unreasonable
as it would be to
call the authors of it knowing
metaphysicians.
The name of the
science called
metaphysics might<lb/ have been happier
chosen: but to impute to impute the confusion
of ideas to the science
of which the endeavout
as to keep them clear
and
to them
whatever be

is as reasonable as it
is would be to impute the
intemperance of
to physics, knavery
to Ethics, or want
of functionality to
watchmaking.


---page break---

As far as concerns
the mischief of the
1st order it stands
upon the same footing
as a common act
of robbery. It is
attended with all
that mischief which
men commonly have
in view when they
think of robbery an act, [and
regard it as an object
meet for punishment.]

If a person of

If the passenger
who was robbed of
his purse t'other day
on the highway had
had neither wants or
nor feelings, or the
money he was robbed
of had been worth
nothing to him, the
act revolution effected
by the highway man
who robbed him of it
would might have been beneficial
to the state.


---page break---

If the Church
dignitary who
lost has benefice
the state pensioner
who lost his pension, or was the
proprietor of Seigneur who lost feudal
rights sho
and the proprietor
of an office who
receives an inadequate
price for it had neither
wants nor feelings, or if the emoluments
they
found themselves
bereft of had had no
value in their hands
been worth nothing
to them.

The language
was that the
Church dignitary,
the pensioner,
the placeman, the feudal proprietor
were more
selfish more attached
to their property,
than other men: and this
observation circumstance which
had it any truth in it
would have encreased enhanced
the public mischief
of the measure was tal
relied on dwelt upon as an
argument in
justification of the
measure.


---page break---

Nay but say they
the Churchman had
no property: and
where there is no
property there is
no injustice. The
bread which feeds
the mechanic, the
shopkeeper or
landowner, is the
property of the landowner
the shop-keeper
or the mechanic:
but the bread which
feeds the Churchman
is not his property
the property of the Churchman.

If the widow whose
means of subsistence
consists in the interest
of a sum of
money, the forced
reductions of the rate
of interest might
If her have made
an addition to that
amount to the wealth
of nations, but it
remains yet to be
proved that £20
a year is worth less
to the widow who
has £500 to lend,
than to the landowner
improver or the manufacturer
that wants
to borrow it.
As the savings of
the land-improver
and manufacturer
accumulate encrease, the
money treasured mite of the helpless
widow is worth
less and less to them
and they will give less
and less for the use
of it: but is any
thing added to the
wealth of the state by
forcing her to take less for
her money than they would
be content to give for it.


---page break---

If Madame de
la Grange had
been a member of
the National Assembly,
she might
have proved that
she had poisoned
nobody, or that poisoning
was no injury.
Arsenic,
she might have
said is the same
thing with sugar:
and sugar is a
sweet and wholesome
aliment.


---page break---

Oh, but those overgrown
Churchmen
were idle: they did
next to nothing for their
money
. If they
had done absolutely
nothing would they
have been any otherwise
than upon a
part with the landowner
of equal
income?

Oh but the landowner
got children – perhaps so
and so would the
Churchman of pretend
lit from, When
is the most of
understand the satisfaction
of getting
and of leaving children:
but where
is the merit of it.
If it is of no use
to the state that
the Churchman now
he is begotten should
be fed, what was the
use of getting him?

If a race of idlers
are to succeed one
another what difference
does it make
to the state whether
they are of the same
blood or different
bloods?


Identifier: | JB/029/006/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 29.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

029

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

006

Info in main headings field

civil reforms brouillon

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

9449

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in