JB/029/008/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/029/008/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/029/008/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/029/008/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>All those proprietors<lb/>
whose lot were <add>shares are</add> at<lb/>
present above the mark<lb/>
would see themselves<lb/>
plundered and impoverished,<lb/>
and the<lb/>
whole fabric of their<lb/>
expectations blown<lb/>
away: and after<lb/>
all the work of equalisation<lb/>
would remain<lb/>
yet to do, as<lb/>
if nothing had been<lb/>
done.</p>
<pb/>
<p>Prossession<lb/>
nothing but a<lb/>
ground of expectations</p>
<p>Source of the <unclear>further</unclear><lb/>
about natural rights</p>
<p>Strength of the<lb/>
passions added <add>joined</add><lb/>
to the weakness of<lb/>
the understanding</p>
<p>A cover for <gap/><lb/>
invective &amp; the language<lb/>
of a badly philosophical Bellingsgate. <lb/>
A man went<lb/>
acknowledge propriety<lb/>
to be the<lb/>
creature of the law.</p>
<p>The truth is that<lb/>
physical relations<lb/>
may generate expectation in a<lb/>
weak degree – but<lb/>
the full assurance<lb/>
can only be derived<lb/>
from law.</p>
<p>There is nothing a<lb/>
man can have<lb/>
but what it may<lb/>
be necessary he should<lb/>
be obliged to part<lb/>
with by law.</p>
<p>Nobody should <del>have</del> <add>experience</add><lb/><del>any</del> that mortification<lb/>
today only, but that<lb/>
nobody should feel any<lb/>
such mortification <del>any</del><lb/>
tomorrow or next day<lb/>
or in short any day.</p>
<pb/>
<p><add>What is <gap/>.</add>  The object of an<lb/>
equalisation system?<lb/>
is not that any <add>men</add><lb/>
should have less than<lb/>
they leave?  <add>No –</add>, but that<lb/>
many should have<lb/>
more.<lb/>
What would be the result? <del>of of such<lb/>
a plan if pursued<lb/>
would be</del> that nobody<lb/>
would have anything</p>
<p>Such a plan<lb/>
were it to be carried<lb/>
into execution could<lb/>
not subsist two minutes<lb/>
together.  The<lb/>
parsimonious and<lb/>
industrious <add>money getting</add> would<lb/>
accumulate the<lb/>
prodigal would dissipate.<lb/>
Death would disturb the division<lb/>
every moment<lb/>
<del>An law</del> equalisation<lb/>
law would be a<lb/>
law for the encouragement <add>propagation</add><lb/>
of immorality<lb/>
a law for the encouragement<lb/>
of prodigality<lb/>
– a law prohibiting<lb/>
industry and<lb/>
frugality – and that<lb/>
under pain of confiscation</p>
<p>What is the object<lb/>
of such a plan of<lb/>
this sort consistently<lb/>
pursued: perfect and<lb/>
perpetual equality,<lb/>
&amp; nothing less.  It is not<lb/>
that this or that man<lb/>
should see nobody above<lb/>
him, but that nobody<lb/>
should: it is not that<lb/>
<add>nobody</add></p>
<pb/>
<p>An equalisation law<lb/>
of occasional only,<lb/>
would not come up<lb/>
to its object: it <add>or its<lb/>
principles</add> would be productive<lb/>
of misery in abundance,<lb/>
and all that<lb/>
misery would be<lb/>
in waste.</p>
<p>If permanent, it<lb/>
would not be simply<lb/>
injurious to society, but radically<lb/>
destructive of it.<lb/>
<del>It would not cease<lb/>
to operate</del>  So long<lb/>
as <del>an</del> a single <unclear>stone</unclear><lb/>
in the fabric remained<lb/>
upon another its<lb/>
operation would not<lb/>
be at an end.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> The business would<lb/>
be to do <unclear>again</unclear> at<lb/>
every good season,<lb/>
and at every bad<lb/>
season, <del>as</del> upon <del>the</del><lb/>
<add>every</add> birth <del>of every child</del><lb/>
and <del>again</del> <add>at</add> every<lb/>
death.</p>
<p>So long as any<lb/>
one man had the<lb/>
value of a handful<lb/>
of corn more than any other <add>his neighbours</add><lb/>
the legal pillage<lb/>
must go on: it<lb/>
must be distributed<lb/>
grain by grain among<lb/>
as many as<lb/>
<del>had less</del> where were<lb/>
whose stock fell short<lb/>
of the mark.  Stop<lb/>
where you would<lb/>
you could not defend<lb/>
the stoppage but upon<lb/>
principles which reprobate<lb/>
the commencement<lb/>
of the<lb/>
career.</p>
<pb/>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Thus far we<lb/>
[messy first go through, apologies to anyone who gets back to this before me]
<add>see</add> have nothing<lb/>
[1st column]
worse than simple<lb/>
All those proprietors whose [/that are] let were at from abroad the ... would a ... and the whole fabric of their expectations blown away: and after all the work of equalisation would remain yet to do, as if nothing had been done.
misery: the next<lb/>
 
stage brings us to<lb/>
[2nd col - almost all x'd out]
absolute destruction. <lb/>
Proportion?
Who would sow, if<lb/>
nothing but a ground of expectation
nobody were to reap<lb/>
 
or what is worse,<lb/>
source of the further about natural rights
if those who had<lb/>
 
done <add>performed</add> neither the<lb/>
LINE
one task nor the<lb/>
 
other were to carry <add>bear<lb/>
strength of this fictions? [/sound] added to the weakness of the understanding
away the largest</add> off the produce from<lb/>
 
him who had performed<lb/>
LINE
both?</p>
 
<p>Suppose a system<lb/>
A cover for ... of a badly proonged ... man went ... to the existence of the law.
of unrelenting equalisation<lb/>
 
established among a ships crew,<lb/>
LINE
and the stock of spirits<lb/>
 
among<lb/>
The truth is that physical relation has grounds expectation in a weak degree but the full ... can only be derived from law
other things to be the<lb/>
 
object of it. The drunkard<lb/>
LINE
no sooner <del>on</del> <add>had</add> he<lb/>
 
emptied his keg, would<lb/>
There is nothing a man can have but what it may be ... he should be obliged to part with by law
have it replenished at<lb/>
 
the expence of the moderate<lb/>
LINE
and the frugal,<lb/>
 
and so toties quoties<lb/>
//// nodboy should feel my ... modiication ... tomorrow or next day or in short any day
while there was a drop<lb/>
 
less in the ship:  <add>the word</add> one<lb/>
[3rd col]
part of the crew would<lb/>
What is degree. The object of an equalisation system? is not that many should have less than they have, but that many should have more.  WHat would be the result?
destroy themselves, while<lb/>
 
the other <add>better</add> part lost their<lb/>
...
share.</p>
that anybody could have any thing.
<p>How preserve<lb/>
... were it to be carried into execution could not subsist too in metet together. The parsimonious and industrious p/money getting?] would accumulate The prodigal would deferate ... would distrupt the division ... equalisation law would be a law for the [/propagation] encourage much of immorality a law for the encouragement of prodiality - a law prohibiting industry and frugality and that pain of confiscation
real equality, under<lb/>
 
this scheme of normal<lb/>
LINE
equalisation. Drunken<lb/>
 
and sober they<lb/>
What is the object of such a system of this for consistently persued: perfect and perpetual equality ... it is not that this is that man would see nobody above him and that nobody should: it is not that ...
must all<lb/>
 
thrust their<lb/>
[4th col]
like kegs not<lb/>
An equalisation law of recasional only would not come up to its object: it would be productive of misery in abundance and all that industry would be in waste. If permanent it would not be similarly injurious to industry. but radically destructive of it ... So long as a rough thorn in the fabric remained upon account its operation would not be at an end. So long as any one man ... land full of corn more than any [/his neighbours] other the legal privilege must go on: at must be distributed grain by grain or thing as many as ...
cask together, and<lb/>
 
themselves motion<lb/>
[5th col]
lest any <add>that two</add> men<lb/>
 
be behind his.</p>
These for we have nothing worse than simple misery: the most ... is to abolish destruction. Who would sow if nobody were to reap or what is worse, if those who had performed ... the one task nor the other were to carry away the largest of the ... from him who had performed both?
<p>What would the<lb/>
 
commander do all<lb/>
LINE
this while, if he were<lb/>
 
a man of prudence?<lb/>
Suppose a system of ... equalisation established among a ... and the stock of ...
He would do what the<lb/>
 
commander of the<lb/>
LINE
shipwrecked Indiaman<lb/>
 
did – he would<lb/>
The ... would be to do upon at wing good reason, and as wing bad season, upon every birth ... and at every death
slew the cask.</p>
 
<p>The Grosvenor Indiaman<lb/>
LINE
wrecked on the<lb/>
 
Coast of Caffraria<lb/>
Other things to be the object of it. The ... they would have it refurished ... and so ...
in 1782. See Carters<lb/>
 
Narrative London 1791.</p>
LINE
<p><head>Community of goods</head></p>
 
<p>One <add>possibly</add> practicable scheme<lb/>
[6th col]
only remains under<lb/>
 
the domination of the<lb/>
Community of goods One [/palpably] practicable scheme only remains under the domination of the equalisation principle, a community of goods. Every other scheme woud be false ad unfit ... as the next defence to ... itself. Thi would only be [/destructive] fatal to liberty.
equalisation principle, a <add>the</add> community of goods.<lb/>
 
Every other scheme would be <del>a</del> fatal<lb/>
LINE
in the first place to morality,<lb/>
 
in the next place<lb/>
real equality, under this scheme of nominal?/normal equalisation. ... and ... they ... all ... their ... like legs not .. cash together, and drink themselves motionless, lest [/that so] many ... his fellows. What would the commander do all the while, if it were a small of prudence ... cask ...  
to society itself, this<lb/>
 
would only be fatal <add>destructive</add> to liberty.</p>
The governor India ... cost of ...
<pb/>
 
<p>A thorough leveller<lb/>
[7th col-
is a man<lb/>
 
if there be such a<lb/>
A thorough develler is a man of which be such a man whose the ... of envy has swallows up every other: . a man ... [/the] hatred ... he bears to others has got the better of their love for others to himself ... where so long as for saw gladly who was better of than him would ... content not to be better off than any body above himself on the scale of [/opulence] property would be content to see himself above nobody [/not to be anbody] ... who would s.... so as he could ... leave of fear ...
man <add>in</add> whom the passion<lb/>
 
of envy has<lb/>
oh but all these are but instruments of luxury the abuse of which far frmo being a life would be a riddance to the commonwealth
swallowed up every<lb/>
 
other:–  a man in<lb/>
[8th col]
whom <add>the</add> hatred <del>of others</del><lb/>
 
he bears to others has<lb/>
oh but all this exaggerated and intractable this is not s... equalisation, it is equality run amok
got the better of the<lb/>
 
love he bears to himself:<lb/>
what we mean is a system of equalisation not exaggerated like this but mediately? practicable?
who so long<lb/>
 
as for saw nobody<lb/>
There is no such thing ... you must do what is impracticable, or you do nothing ... where you will you can stop no where for any reason, which would not with equal ... have forced you to begin ...
who was better off<lb/>
 
than him would<lb/>
In the first place there is no reason to be given [/found] why any have should be deprived at all, in the next place, it would be negligible to find any one given found at which to draw it.
be content <add>not</add> to be better<lb/>
 
off than any body<lb/>
Every step you take in the carrier of equalisation makes the demand for a new step not less urgent, butmore so.
above himself on<lb/>
 
the scale of prosperity <add>opulence</add><lb/>
suppose three classes; the most numerous of of course the least wealth;
would be content to<lb/>
 
see <add>not to see</add> himself above<lb/>
[9th col]
nobody<add>any body</add> – who would<lb/>
 
part <add>bid adieu</add> with hope, so<lb/>
In the first [/place] al articles in which general? value is included in the ... of a rough article and that article individisible, [/must be ???] would perish altogether. All ... houses and pleasure grounds there are rough ... for which £2000 has been given - ... turns for which £3000 has been refused ...
as he could take<lb/>
 
leave of fear <del>at<lb/>
LINE
the same time</del></p>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Oh but all these<lb/>
wealthy - to what ... and strikes off the offer .... having the .... ? The lowest, which they had to ... above ... found themselves reneged upon ... their immediate superiors by the superiority of the superiors of these superiorrs: now this compensation is at an end: and the ... ofthose who were nearest to their ... becomes state ... intolerable...
are but instruments<lb/>
 
of luxury<lb/>
[10th col]
the abuse of which<lb/>
 
far from being a<lb/>
Horses require ... and keep them ... to land upon them ... ... requires ... to hold them ... All costly which ... furniture, jewels, ... publications of articles must for the same reason go to the fire ... Were they even accumulated as an ... building ... extended to individuals at large at the expense of the state even that from .... management of such ...
loss would be a<lb/>
 
riddance to the commonwealth.</hi></p>
management?
<pb/>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Oh – but all this<lb/>
 
exaggerated <add>extravagant</add> and<lb/>
 
impracticable – this<lb/>
is not <gap/> equalisation,<lb/>
it is equality run mad</hi> –<lb/>
What we mean is<lb/>
a system of equalisation<lb/>
not exaggerated <add>like this</add> but moderate<lb/>
and practicable.</p>
<p>Moderate<lb/>
&amp; practicable I <unclear>answer.</unclear><lb/>
There is no such<lb/>
thing. You must <del>do<lb/>
what</del> run into extravagance, you must<lb/>
do what is impracticable,<lb/>
or you do nothing. Stop where<lb/>
you will you can<lb/>
stop no where for<lb/>
any reason which<lb/>
would not with equal<lb/>
strenuousness<lb/>
have forbid you <add>ever</add> to<lb/>
begin.</p>
<p>In the first place<lb/>
there is no reason can<lb/>
be given <add>found</add> why any<lb/>
line should be drawn<lb/>
at allin the next<lb/>
place, it would be<lb/>
impossible to find any<lb/>
one given point at<lb/>
which to draw it.</p>


<p>Every step you take in<lb/>
the career of equalisation<lb/>
makes the demand<lb/>
for a new step not less <add>the</add> urgent,<lb/>
but <add>the</add> more so.<lb/>
Suppose <add>at present</add> three classes;<lb/>
the most numerous<lb/>
of course the least wealthy:</p>
wealthy – To what<lb/>
end strike off <add>reduce</add> the upper<lb/>
class, leaving the<lb/>
middlemost?  The lowest,<lb/>
while they had <add>saw</add><lb/>
two classes above them<lb/>
found themselves revenged<lb/>
upon <del>the end</del><lb/>
their immediate superiors<lb/>
by the superiority<lb/>
of the superiors<lb/>
of those superiors:  now<lb/>
this compensation is<lb/>
at an end:  and the<lb/>
encreased <unclear>perseverence</unclear><lb/>
of those who were<lb/>
nearest to their own<lb/>
becomes still more<lb/>
intolerable.</p><pb/>
<p>In the first <add>place</add> all<lb/>
articles in which<lb/>
great value is included<lb/>
in the compass<lb/>
of a single<lb/>
article and that article<lb/>
indivisible, <lb/>
<add>must be sacrificed</add> would perish altogether.<lb/>
All mansions, houses and<lb/>
pleasure grounds.<lb/>
There are single horses<lb/>
for which £2000<lb/>
has been given – pictures<lb/>
for which<lb/>
£3000 has been<lb/>
refused.  Statues for<lb/>
which £300 a year<lb/>
has been paid in the<lb/>
way of rent.</p>
<pb/>
<p>Horses require stables<lb/>
to keep them in, and<lb/>
grooms to tend upon them.  Pictures and<lb/>
Statues require <sic>spatious</sic><lb/>
rooms to hold them –<lb/>
pictures fires <del>to</del> in<lb/>
those rooms to air<lb/>
them.</p>
<p>All costly articles<lb/>
of dress or furniture<lb/>
Jewels, plate <gap/><lb/>
hangings, libraries<lb/>
and even single<lb/>
publications if voluminous<lb/>
must for<lb/>
the same reason go<lb/>
to the fire.  Sale<lb/>
<del>will not</del> <add>remains</add> cure the evil<lb/>
<del>the</del> without lessening<lb/>
it – <del>they must be</del><lb/>
<gap/> from hand<lb/>
to hand, the chase<lb/>
can never cease<lb/>
till they are safely<lb/>
lodged <add><gap/></add> in the fire.</p>
<p>Were they even accumulated<lb/>
in one or<lb/>
<add>a few</add> immense buildings to <add><del>there</del></add><lb/>
be kept and exhibited<lb/>
to individuals at large<lb/>
at the expense of the<lb/>
state even that fear<lb/>
from among the evil<lb/>
would scarce lessen it,<lb/>
For <add>in</add> the custody and<lb/>
management of such<lb/>
immense treasures <del>could</del> <add>a</add>
<del>only be <gap/></del> <add>few only could participate:</add><lb/>
and in regard<lb/>
to treasurers like these<lb/>
<add>sale apart</add> what is proprietorship<lb/>
<del>when</del>more than custody<lb/>
and management?<lb/>
<add>Oh but</add>
</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 03:56, 18 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

All those proprietors
whose lot were shares are at
present above the mark
would see themselves
plundered and impoverished,
and the
whole fabric of their
expectations blown
away: and after
all the work of equalisation
would remain
yet to do, as
if nothing had been
done.


---page break---

Prossession
nothing but a
ground of expectations

Source of the further
about natural rights

Strength of the
passions added joined
to the weakness of
the understanding

A cover for
invective & the language
of a badly philosophical Bellingsgate.
A man went
acknowledge propriety
to be the
creature of the law.

The truth is that
physical relations
may generate expectation in a
weak degree – but
the full assurance
can only be derived
from law.

There is nothing a
man can have
but what it may
be necessary he should
be obliged to part
with by law.

Nobody should have experience
any that mortification
today only, but that
nobody should feel any
such mortification any
tomorrow or next day
or in short any day.


---page break---

What is . The object of an
equalisation system?
is not that any men
should have less than
they leave? No –, but that
many should have
more.
What would be the result? of of such
a plan if pursued
would be
that nobody
would have anything

Such a plan
were it to be carried
into execution could
not subsist two minutes
together. The
parsimonious and
industrious money getting would
accumulate the
prodigal would dissipate.
Death would disturb the division
every moment
An law equalisation
law would be a
law for the encouragement propagation
of immorality
a law for the encouragement
of prodigality
– a law prohibiting
industry and
frugality – and that
under pain of confiscation

What is the object
of such a plan of
this sort consistently
pursued: perfect and
perpetual equality,
& nothing less. It is not
that this or that man
should see nobody above
him, but that nobody
should: it is not that
nobody


---page break---

An equalisation law
of occasional only,
would not come up
to its object: it or its
principles
would be productive
of misery in abundance,
and all that
misery would be
in waste.

If permanent, it
would not be simply
injurious to society, but radically
destructive of it.
It would not cease
to operate
So long
as an a single stone
in the fabric remained
upon another its
operation would not
be at an end. The business would
be to do again at
every good season,
and at every bad
season, as upon the
every birth of every child
and again at every
death.

So long as any
one man had the
value of a handful
of corn more than any other his neighbours
the legal pillage
must go on: it
must be distributed
grain by grain among
as many as
had less where were
whose stock fell short
of the mark. Stop
where you would
you could not defend
the stoppage but upon
principles which reprobate
the commencement
of the
career.


---page break---

Thus far we
see have nothing
worse than simple
misery: the next
stage brings us to
absolute destruction.
Who would sow, if
nobody were to reap
or what is worse,
if those who had
done performed neither the
one task nor the
other were to carry bear
away the largest
off the produce from
him who had performed
both?

Suppose a system
of unrelenting equalisation
established among a ships crew,
and the stock of spirits
among
other things to be the
object of it. The drunkard
no sooner on had he
emptied his keg, would
have it replenished at
the expence of the moderate
and the frugal,
and so toties quoties
while there was a drop
less in the ship: the word one
part of the crew would
destroy themselves, while
the other better part lost their
share.

How preserve
real equality, under
this scheme of normal
equalisation. Drunken
and sober they
must all
thrust their
like kegs not
cask together, and
themselves motion
lest any that two men
be behind his.

What would the
commander do all
this while, if he were
a man of prudence?
He would do what the
commander of the
shipwrecked Indiaman
did – he would
slew the cask.

The Grosvenor Indiaman
wrecked on the
Coast of Caffraria
in 1782. See Carters
Narrative London 1791.

Community of goods

One possibly practicable scheme
only remains under
the domination of the
equalisation principle, a the community of goods.
Every other scheme would be a fatal
in the first place to morality,
in the next place
to society itself, this
would only be fatal destructive to liberty.


---page break---

A thorough leveller
is a man
if there be such a
man in whom the passion
of envy has
swallowed up every
other:– a man in
whom the hatred of others
he bears to others has
got the better of the
love he bears to himself:
who so long
as for saw nobody
who was better off
than him would
be content not to be better
off than any body
above himself on
the scale of prosperity opulence
would be content to
see not to see himself above
nobodyany body – who would
part bid adieu with hope, so
as he could take
leave of fear at
the same time

Oh but all these
are but instruments
of luxury
the abuse of which
far from being a
loss would be a
riddance to the commonwealth.


---page break---

Oh – but all this
exaggerated extravagant and
impracticable – this
is not equalisation,
it is equality run mad

What we mean is
a system of equalisation
not exaggerated like this but moderate
and practicable.

Moderate
& practicable I answer.
There is no such
thing. You must do
what
run into extravagance, you must
do what is impracticable,
or you do nothing. Stop where
you will you can
stop no where for
any reason which
would not with equal
strenuousness
have forbid you ever to
begin.

In the first place
there is no reason can
be given found why any
line should be drawn
at all: in the next
place, it would be
impossible to find any
one given point at
which to draw it.

Every step you take in
the career of equalisation
makes the demand
for a new step not less the urgent,
but the more so.
Suppose at present three classes;
the most numerous
of course the least wealthy:

wealthy – To what
end strike off reduce the upper
class, leaving the
middlemost? The lowest,
while they had saw
two classes above them
found themselves revenged
upon the end
their immediate superiors
by the superiority
of the superiors
of those superiors: now
this compensation is
at an end: and the
encreased perseverence
of those who were
nearest to their own
becomes still more

intolerable.


---page break---

In the first place all
articles in which
great value is included
in the compass
of a single
article and that article
indivisible,
must be sacrificed would perish altogether.
All mansions, houses and
pleasure grounds.
There are single horses
for which £2000
has been given – pictures
for which
£3000 has been
refused. Statues for
which £300 a year
has been paid in the
way of rent.


---page break---

Horses require stables
to keep them in, and
grooms to tend upon them. Pictures and
Statues require spatious
rooms to hold them –
pictures fires to in
those rooms to air
them.

All costly articles
of dress or furniture
Jewels, plate
hangings, libraries
and even single
publications if voluminous
must for
the same reason go
to the fire. Sale
will not remains cure the evil
the without lessening
it – they must be
from hand
to hand, the chase
can never cease
till they are safely
lodged in the fire.

Were they even accumulated
in one or
a few immense buildings to there
be kept and exhibited
to individuals at large
at the expense of the
state even that fear
from among the evil
would scarce lessen it,
For in the custody and
management of such
immense treasures could a only be few only could participate:
and in regard
to treasurers like these
sale apart what is proprietorship
whenmore than custody
and management?
Oh but


Identifier: | JB/029/008/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 29.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

029

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

008

Info in main headings field

equalisation brouillon moyens d'acquirer

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

9451

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in