JB/141/107/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/107/003: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/141/107/003": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/107/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/107/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>11.</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>C<lb/>
 
<head>Forfeiture of Reputation.</head></p>
 
<p>It is obvious that the discredit reflected by this expedient must<lb/>
 
be greater or less in point of intensity as the offence is esteemed<lb/>
more or less disreputable.</p>
<p>2.  The <del>condemnation</del> <add>censure</add> which in the Law is pronounced<lb/>
in general terms upon such uncertain persons as may chance<lb/>
to become offenders may upon conviction by the assistance<lb/>
of the executive power be brought home to and personally<lb/>
levelled at any individual offender.  And this may be done<lb/>
in a manner more or less public, and either in a settled<lb/>
form of words, or with more latitude in a speech <hi rend="underline">ad libitum</hi><lb/>
to be delivered by the Judge.<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi></p>
<p>3.  But the severest expedient for <add><del>method of</del></add> inflicting infamy is<lb/>
that which <del>is practised by the</del> <add>consists in the</add> applying of some political<lb/>
punishment which by its influence on the imaginations of<lb/>
mankind is in possession of <add>the power of</add> producing this effect.  This<lb/>
<add>leads</add></p>
<p><head>Note</head></p>
<p><hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi>  Where the punishment is capital or the sentence discretionary<lb/>
it is common with us in England to preface it with such a<lb/>
Speech.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:03, 20 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

11.

C
Forfeiture of Reputation.

It is obvious that the discredit reflected by this expedient must
be greater or less in point of intensity as the offence is esteemed
more or less disreputable.

2. The condemnation censure which in the Law is pronounced
in general terms upon such uncertain persons as may chance
to become offenders may upon conviction by the assistance
of the executive power be brought home to and personally
levelled at any individual offender. And this may be done
in a manner more or less public, and either in a settled
form of words, or with more latitude in a speech ad libitum
to be delivered by the Judge.(a)

3. But the severest expedient for method of inflicting infamy is
that which is practised by the consists in the applying of some political
punishment which by its influence on the imaginations of
mankind is in possession of the power of producing this effect. This
leads

Note

(a) Where the punishment is capital or the sentence discretionary
it is common with us in England to preface it with such a
Speech.


Identifier: | JB/141/107/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

14

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

107

Info in main headings field

forfeiture of reputation

Image

003

Titles

note

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

Watermarks

myears

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48324

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in