★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/005/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/071/005/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><head>3</head><lb/><head>C</head><lb/><head>Of Justifications Reasons</head><lb/></p> | |||
<p>that the author of it should be punished.</p> <p>It may be objected - "but when (<del>is this advantage</del><lb/> "in the case <del>supposed</del> <add>above <gap/> for instance) is this advantage?</add> <del>) supposing </del> suppose<lb/> "on the one hand that no such fraud as <del><gap/></del> <add>there</add><lb/>"supposed is practised and yet your adversary<lb/> "gets the better of you: suppose on the other hand<lb/> "that both frauds are practised, and yet you get<lb/> "the better of your adversary <del>after all</del> <add>notwithstanding</add>: On<lb/>"these suppositions, far from having the advantage<lb/> "in the case in which the consent obtained from<lb/> "you <hi rend='underline'>was</hi> fairly obtained, it is in that case<lb/> "that you <hi rend='underline'>lose</hi> your point and it is in the<lb/> "other, in which the consent was <hi rend='underline'>not</hi> fairly obtained<lb/> that you gain it"</p><lb/> <p>The answer is - that it is not the eventual<lb/> advantage that remains at the long run that is<lb/> the advantage in question,upon the giving you<lb/>or not giving you of which the innocence of <lb/> you atagonist depends; but that chance of gaining <del>advantage</del><lb/> your point which was the advantage<lb/> you had in <del><gap/></del> view at the <add>very</add> time of the consenting.<lb/> Now then, that chance which he <hi rend='underline'>seemed</hi> to give<lb/> you, he really did <del>not</del> give you: and therefore<lb/> as it is only upon the supposition of his really <add>giving</add></p> | |||
<!-- Is it unusual to have the "open quote" marks at the start of each line but only the "close quote" marks athe end of the quote? --><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
3
C
Of Justifications Reasons
that the author of it should be punished.
It may be objected - "but when (is this advantage
"in the case supposed above for instance) is this advantage? ) supposing suppose
"on the one hand that no such fraud as there
"supposed is practised and yet your adversary
"gets the better of you: suppose on the other hand
"that both frauds are practised, and yet you get
"the better of your adversary after all notwithstanding: On
"these suppositions, far from having the advantage
"in the case in which the consent obtained from
"you was fairly obtained, it is in that case
"that you lose your point and it is in the
"other, in which the consent was not fairly obtained
that you gain it"
The answer is - that it is not the eventual
advantage that remains at the long run that is
the advantage in question,upon the giving you
or not giving you of which the innocence of
you atagonist depends; but that chance of gaining advantage
your point which was the advantage
you had in view at the very time of the consenting.
Now then, that chance which he seemed to give
you, he really did not give you: and therefore
as it is only upon the supposition of his really giving
|
Identifier: | JB/071/005/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
071 |
penal code |
||
|
005 |
of justifications - reasons |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
alexander mavrokordatos |
|||
|
23408 |
|||
