JB/141/110/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/110/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/141/110/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/110/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/110/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>21.</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>C<lb/>
 
<head>Forfeiture of Reputation.</head></p>
 
<p>unless by accident has no connection with that of which<lb/>
 
he has <add>actually</add> been proved guilty.</p>
<p>The method too <del>in which</del> <add>which is taken to inflict</add> this punishment<lb/>
<del>is inflicted</del> is equally remarkable.  It is inflicted not by<lb/>
any restraint or other punishment applied to the delinquent<lb/>
but by a laid upon another person<lb/>
a Judge, or by <add><del>a mischief</del></add> an inconvenience which may be of any<lb/>
kind whatsoever, thrown (as the case may require) upon<lb/>
any person whatsoever.  The Judge is forbidden to interrogate<lb/>
him or to permit him to be interrogated as a witness<lb/>
in any cause, as also to pay any regard on any such<lb/>
occasion to any instrument purport ing to contain his<lb/>
written attestation.  The party who may have stood in need<lb/>
of his evidence for the preservation of his Life, Liberty<lb/>
or fortune, or the public who may have stood in need<lb/>
of it to warrant the punishment and guard itself against<lb/>
the enterprizes of another perhaps more atrocious criminal,<lb/>
<add>are</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:05, 20 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

21.

C
Forfeiture of Reputation.

unless by accident has no connection with that of which
he has actually been proved guilty.

The method too in which which is taken to inflict this punishment
is inflicted is equally remarkable. It is inflicted not by
any restraint or other punishment applied to the delinquent
but by a laid upon another person
a Judge, or by a mischief an inconvenience which may be of any
kind whatsoever, thrown (as the case may require) upon
any person whatsoever. The Judge is forbidden to interrogate
him or to permit him to be interrogated as a witness
in any cause, as also to pay any regard on any such
occasion to any instrument purport ing to contain his
written attestation. The party who may have stood in need
of his evidence for the preservation of his Life, Liberty
or fortune, or the public who may have stood in need
of it to warrant the punishment and guard itself against
the enterprizes of another perhaps more atrocious criminal,
are


Identifier: | JB/141/110/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

20-21, 24

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

110

Info in main headings field

forfeiture of reputation

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f21 / f22

Penner

Watermarks

myears

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48327

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in