JB/052/090/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:55, 23 November 2021

1825. March 20.
Procedure Code.

P II
Ch IV Intermediate proceeding
§. Testimony, how procurable

1.
In every such Testimony-requiring
Mandate
will moreover
be inserted the warnings
following.
1. Warning of the burthensome
consequence
of non compliance
2. Warning of the burthensome
consequence
of falsity in several
shapes.

2.
So where Defendant
has applicable property.

3.
Warning of suspicion
of delinquency.

4.
But to pursuer, evil
from non attendance
of witness may be the
same as in the opposite
case.

5.
In general, more
convenient to accept
of epistolary response
than to send for oral
examination to distant
judicatory.

6.
Epistolary testimony
eventually confronted
with oral.

7.
On reiterated enquiry,
accersition of witness
on suspicion
of mendacity.

8.
So even on original
enquiry.

9.
Cases for preferableness
of epistolary over
oral Testimony
1. Fact solitary.
2. Fact simple.

---page break---

10.
Exceptions excepted,
compulsion not remuneration.

11.
Reasons
1. By remuneration,
a tendency to produce
false testimony.
2. Reliance on it not
so strong as when procured
without remuneration.
3. Waste of money.
4. Corruptive tendency.

12.
Exceptions
1. Where remuneration
appointed by law.
2. Remuneration
appointed by express
ordinance on individual
circumstances.

13.
No action producible
without impelling
motives, counterballancing
restraining motives.

14.
Cases where need of
such motives.
1. Suit simply requisitive.

15.
Though compulsion
employable, yet the
evidence may not
be elicitable without
remuneration.

16.
Where compulsory
mode employed,
compensation to be
announced or delivered.

Identifier: \| JB/052/090/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.
Date_1	1825-03-20	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-16
Box	052	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	090	Info in main headings field	procedure code
Image	001	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	john flowerdew colls	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	jonathan blenman
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	16763
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>1825. March 20.<lb/>Procedure Code.</head> <p><note>P II<lb/><sic>Ch</sic> IV Intermediate proceeding<lb/>&sect;. testimony, how procurable</note></p> <!-- this page is organised in two columns --> <p>1.<lb/>In every such Testimony-requiring<lb/>Mandate<lb/>will moreover<lb/>be inserted the warnings<lb/>following.<lb/>1. Warning of the <sic>burthensome</sic><lb/>consequence<lb/>of non compliance<lb/>2. Warning of the <sic>burthensome</sic><lb/>consequence<lb/>of falsity in several<lb/>shapes.</p> <p>2.<lb/>So where Defendant<lb/>has applicable property.</p> <p>3.<lb/>Warning of suspicion<lb/>of delinquency.</p> <p>4.<lb/>But to pursuer, evil<lb/>from non attendance<lb/>of witness may be the<lb/>same as in the opposite<lb/>case.</p> <p>5.<lb/>In general, more<lb/>convenient to accept<lb/>of epistolary response<lb/>than to send for oral<lb/>examination to distant<lb/>judicatory.</p> <p>6.<lb/>Epistolary testimony<lb/>eventually confronted<lb/>with oral.</p> <p>7.<lb/>On reiterated enquiry,<lb/><sic>accersition</sic> of witness<lb/>on suspicion<lb/>of mendacity.</p> <p.8.<lb/>So even on original enquiry.</p> <p>9.<lb/>Cases for <sic>preferableness</sic><lb/>of epistolary over<lb/>oral Testimony<lb/>1. Fact solitary.<lb/>2. Fact simple.</p> <pb/> <!-- start of second column --> <p>10.<lb/>Exceptions excepted,<lb/>compulsion not remuneration.</p> <p>11.<lb/>Reasons<lb?>1. By remuneration,<lb/>a tendency to produce<lb/>false testimony.<lb/>2. Reliance on it not<lb/>so strong as when procured<lb?>without remuneration.<lb/>3. Waste of money.<lb/>4. Corruptive tendency.</p> <p>12.<lb/>Exceptions<lb/>1. Where remuneration<lb/>appointed by law.<lb/>2. Remuneration<lb/>appointed by express<lb/>ordinance on individual<lb/>circumstances.</p> <p>13.<lb/>No action producible<lb/>without impelling<lb/>motives, <sic>counterballancing</sic><lb/>restraining motives.</p> <p>14.<lb/>Cases where need of<lb/>such motives.<lb/>1. Suit simply <sic>requisitive</sic>.</p> <p>15.<lb/>Though compulsion<lb/>employable, yet the<lb/>evidence may not<lb/>be elicitable without<lb/>remuneration.</p> <p>16.<lb/>Where compulsory<lb/>mode employed,<lb/>compensation to be<lb/>announced or delivered.</p>
+<head>1825. March 20.<lb/>Procedure Code.</head> <p><note>P II<lb/><sic>Ch</sic> IV Intermediate proceeding<lb/>&sect;. Testimony, how procurable</note></p> <!-- this page is organised in two columns --> <p>1.<lb/>In every such Testimony-requiring<lb/>Mandate<lb/>will moreover<lb/>be inserted the warnings<lb/>following.<lb/>1. Warning of the <sic>burthensome</sic><lb/>consequence<lb/>of non compliance<lb/>2. Warning of the <sic>burthensome</sic><lb/>consequence<lb/>of falsity in several<lb/>shapes.</p> <p>2.<lb/>So where Defendant<lb/>has applicable property.</p> <p>3.<lb/>Warning of suspicion<lb/>of delinquency.</p> <p>4.<lb/>But to pursuer, evil<lb/>from non attendance<lb/>of witness may be the<lb/>same as in the opposite<lb/>case.</p> <p>5.<lb/>In general, more<lb/>convenient to accept<lb/>of epistolary response<lb/>than to send for oral<lb/>examination to distant<lb/>judicatory.</p> <p>6.<lb/>Epistolary testimony<lb/>eventually confronted<lb/>with oral.</p> <p>7.<lb/>On reiterated enquiry,<lb/><sic>accersition</sic> of witness<lb/>on suspicion<lb/>of mendacity.</p> <p>8.<lb/>So even on original<lb/>enquiry.</p> <p>9.<lb/>Cases for <sic>preferableness</sic><lb/>of epistolary over<lb/>oral Testimony<lb/>1. Fact solitary.<lb/>2. Fact simple.</p> <pb/> <!-- start of second column --> <p>10.<lb/>Exceptions excepted,<lb/>compulsion not remuneration.</p> <p>11.<lb/>Reasons<lb/>1. By remuneration,<lb/>a tendency to produce<lb/>false testimony.<lb/>2. Reliance on it not<lb/>so strong as when procured<lb/>without remuneration.<lb/>3. Waste of money.<lb/>4. Corruptive tendency.</p> <p>12.<lb/>Exceptions<lb/>1. Where remuneration<lb/>appointed by law.<lb/>2. Remuneration<lb/>appointed by express<lb/>ordinance on individual<lb/>circumstances.</p> <p>13.<lb/>No action producible<lb/>without impelling<lb/>motives, <sic>counterballancing</sic><lb/>restraining motives.</p> <p>14.<lb/>Cases where need of<lb/>such motives.<lb/>1. Suit simply <sic>requisitive</sic>.</p> <p>15.<lb/>Though compulsion<lb/>employable, yet the<lb/>evidence may not<lb/>be elicitable without<lb/>remuneration.</p> <p>16.<lb/>Where compulsory<lb/>mode employed,<lb/>compensation to be<lb/>announced or delivered.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/052/090/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:55, 23 November 2021

Navigation

Search