JB/141/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/021/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/141/021/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/021/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/021/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>5<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
B.1. Ch.6.</p>
 
<p>another quantity of the same kind, for example<lb/>
 
to five years of imprisonment for a certain<lb/>
 
crime, two more years for a certain aggravation.<lb/>
2. by adding a punishment of a different kind<lb/>
for example, to five years of imprisonment<lb/>
for a certain crime, <del>a public exposure</del> <add>a mark of disgrace <del>exhibition</del></add> for a<lb/>
certain aggravation.</p>
<p><head>IV. Characteristicalness <del>or analogous</del></head></p>
<p>Punishment can <del>act only</del> act as a<lb/>
preventative only, when the idea of it and<lb/>
of its connection with the <del>mind</del> <add>crime</add> is present<lb/>
to the mind.  Now to be present it must<lb/>
be remembered, and to be remembered it must<lb/>
<del>be</del> <add>have been</add> learnt.  But of all punishments that<lb/>
can be imagined there are none of which<lb/>
the connection with the offence is either so<del>me</del><lb/>
easily learnt, or so efficaciously remembered<lb/>
as those of which the <del><gap/></del> idea is already<lb/>
in part associated with some part of the<lb/>
offence, which is the case when the<lb/>
one and the other have some circumstance<lb/>
that belongs to them in common.</p>
<p>The law of Retaliation is admirable<lb/>
in this respect.  <hi rend="underline">An eye for an eye and a<lb/>
tooth for a tooth.</hi> The most imperfect intelligence<lb/>
can connect these <del>two</del> ideas.  <del>The law</del> <add>This rule</add><lb/>
of retaliation is however rarely practicable<lb/>
it is too unequable &amp; too expensive – recourse<lb/>
must therefore be had to other sources of<lb/>
analogy.  We shall therefore recur to this<lb/>
subject in the next Chapter.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 23:37, 26 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

5
B.1. Ch.6.

another quantity of the same kind, for example
to five years of imprisonment for a certain
crime, two more years for a certain aggravation.
2. by adding a punishment of a different kind
for example, to five years of imprisonment
for a certain crime, a public exposure a mark of disgrace exhibition for a
certain aggravation.

IV. Characteristicalness or analogous

Punishment can act only act as a
preventative only, when the idea of it and
of its connection with the mind crime is present
to the mind. Now to be present it must
be remembered, and to be remembered it must
be have been learnt. But of all punishments that
can be imagined there are none of which
the connection with the offence is either some
easily learnt, or so efficaciously remembered
as those of which the idea is already
in part associated with some part of the
offence, which is the case when the
one and the other have some circumstance
that belongs to them in common.

The law of Retaliation is admirable
in this respect. An eye for an eye and a
tooth for a tooth.
The most imperfect intelligence
can connect these two ideas. The law This rule
of retaliation is however rarely practicable
it is too unequable & too expensive – recourse
must therefore be had to other sources of
analogy. We shall therefore recur to this
subject in the next Chapter.


Identifier: | JB/141/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

iv characteristicalness

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f4

Penner

richard smith

Watermarks

dusautoy & rump 1809

Marginals

Paper Producer

edward collins

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

48238

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in