JB/097/032/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/097/032/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/097/032/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/097/032/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/097/032/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>(85)<lb/>
<note>Ad Dorf. Adult y. (85</note><lb/>
<note>Ad Dorf. ADULT<hi rend="superscript">Y</hi>.</note></p>
<head>Obstacles: Legislators useful projects</head> <note>who not adopted?</note><lb/>
<p><head>OBSTACLES: LEGISLATORS USEFUL PROJECTS</head> why not adopted?</p>
 
<p>Tis not the best of all conceivable <add>assignable</add>, but the best of all<lb/>
<p>Tis not the best of all conceivable<hi rend="superscript"><gap/></hi>, but the best of all<lb/>
practicable expedients <add>regulations</add>, that is to be adoptedBut <add>And</add> this<lb/>
practicable expedient<hi rend="superscript">regulations</hi>, that is to be adopted - But<hi rend="superscript">And</hi> thus<lb/>
the Legislator is apt enough <del>for</del> <add>of</add> himself to remember<lb/>
the Legislator is apt enough <del>for</del><hi rend="superscript">of</hi> himself to remember<lb/>
<add>the benefit of</add> success if it accrues, redounds to him <add>but</add> in common<lb/>
<hi rend="superscript"><unclear>the comfort</unclear> of</hi>success if it <unclear>accrues</unclear>, redounds to him<hi rend="superscript">but</hi> in <gap/><lb/>
with the rest <del>of the community</del>: disappointment<lb/>
with the rest of the <unclear>community</unclear>: disappointment<lb/>
with the odium attending it,<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> the attempt of enforcing an unpopular measure</note>, is his own.</p>
with the adium attending it, is his own.<lb/>
<p>For a contrary reason, <add>issuing from the same principle</add> speculative reformers</p>
For a contrary reason,<hi rend="superscript">issuing from the same <gap/></hi> speculative reformers</p>
<p><note>odium from a bad or unsuccessful<lb/>
 
<note>adium from a bad or unsuccessful<lb/>
project is much more certain<lb/>
project is much more certain<lb/>
to him, than <hi rend="superscript"><unclear>lesser</unclear></hi> reputation from<lb/>
to him, than <add>lower</add> reputation from<lb/>
a good one. If there are any<lb/>
a good one. If there are any<lb/>
<sic>malecontents</sic> in the <gap/> government<lb/>  
malecontents in the <add>State</add> government<lb/>  
+ the attempt of enforcing an <lb/>
(&amp; what State is without it's<lb/>
unpopular measure <lb/>
malecontents?) they will leave<lb/>
(&amp; what state is without <sic>it's</sic><lb/>
no stone unturned to crush<lb/>
<sic>malecontents</sic>?) they will leave<lb/>
no stone unturned to crush<lb/>
the project, or if that be
the project, or if that be
not profitable<hi rend="superscript">too much to attempt</hi>, to crush the<lb/>
not profitable <add>too much to attempt</add>, to crush the<lb/>
glory<hi rend="superscript"><gap/></hi> resulting from it.<lb/>
glory <add>power</add> resulting from it,<lb/>
if that cannot be done, they<lb/>
if that cannot be done, they<lb/>
will deny him the <hi rend="superscript">propety</hi>authorship <hi rend="superscript">of it</hi><lb/>
will deny him the authorship <add>property<lb/>
or if that be beyond<lb/>  
of it</add> or if that be beyond<lb/>  
dispute, they will say<lb/>  
dispute, they will say<lb/>  
he was forced into it; and<lb/>
he was forced into it; and<lb/>
Line 35: Line 31:
popular; as if assigning<lb/>
popular; as if assigning<lb/>
the nature of an<lb/>
the nature of an<lb/>
action were destroying <sic>it's</sic><lb/>  
action were destroying it's<lb/>  
merit.<hi rend="superscript"><gap/>of it</hi><lb/></note>
merit. <add><unclear>idea</unclear> of it</add></note></p>
 
<p>If the Privilege &amp; Election Acts had been brought in <lb/>
<p>
If the <sic>Privilige</sic> &amp; Station Acts had been brought in <lb/>
by the popular party &amp; carried through after a struggle<lb/>
by the popular party &amp; carried through after a struggle<lb/>
 
against the general sense <add>inclination</add> of men in power <add>Administration</add> what<lb/>
against the general sense<hi rend="superscript">inclination</hi> of men in power<hi rend="superscript"><gap/><gap/></hi> what<lb/>
end would there have been to triumphs &amp; acclamations?</p>
and would there have been to triumphs &amp; acclamations?<lb/>
</p>
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:23, 15 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

(85)
Ad Dorf. ADULTY.

OBSTACLES: LEGISLATORS USEFUL PROJECTS why not adopted?

Tis not the best of all conceivable assignable, but the best of all
practicable expedients regulations, that is to be adopted. But And this
the Legislator is apt enough for of himself to remember
the benefit of success if it accrues, redounds to him but in common
with the rest of the community: disappointment
with the odium attending it,+ + the attempt of enforcing an unpopular measure, is his own.

For a contrary reason, issuing from the same principle speculative reformers

odium from a bad or unsuccessful
project is much more certain
to him, than lower reputation from
a good one. If there are any
malecontents in the State government
(& what State is without it's
malecontents?) they will leave
no stone unturned to crush
the project, or if that be not profitable too much to attempt, to crush the
glory power resulting from it,
if that cannot be done, they
will deny him the authorship property
of it
or if that be beyond
dispute, they will say
he was forced into it; and
that he did it to make himself
popular; as if assigning
the nature of an
action were destroying it's
merit. idea of it

If the Privilege & Election Acts had been brought in
by the popular party & carried through after a struggle
against the general sense inclination of men in power Administration what
end would there have been to triumphs & acclamations?


Identifier: | JB/097/032/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 97.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

097

Main Headings

Folio number

032

Info in main headings field

obstacles legislators useful projects why not adopted ad dors adulty

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f85

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

ia

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31416

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in